The Protein Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 293–301 | Cite as

Comparative Evaluation of α-Amylase Refolding Through Two Different Artificial Chaperone Systems

  • Fariba Khodagholi
  • Bahareh Eftekharzadeh
  • Razieh Yazdanparast
Article
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

Two different artificial chaperone systems were evaluated in this work using either detergents or CDs as the stripping agents. Upon dilution of urea-denatured α-amylase to a non-denaturing urea concentration in the presence of the capturing agent, complexes of the detergent and non-native protein molecules are formed and thereby the formation of protein aggregates is prevented. The so-called captured protein is unable to refold from the detergent-protein complex states unless a stripping agent is used to remove the detergent molecules. Our results by fluorescence, UV, turbidity measurement, circular dichroism, surface tension and activity assay indicated that the extent of refolding assistance was different due to different inter- and intra- molecular interactions in the two different systems. However, the high activity recovery in the presence of detergents, as the stripping agent, suggests that they can constitute suitable replacement for the more expensive and common stripping agent of cyclodextrins.

Keywords

α-Amylase anionic detergents artificial chaperone Bacillus subtilis cationic detergents cyclodextrins refolding 

References

  1. Bernfeld P. (1951) Advances in Enzymology (VII). Interscience Publ 379, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Betts S. D., King J. (1998) Protein. Sci. 7:1516–1523Google Scholar
  3. Chen L., Xiao J. X., Raun K., Ma J. (2004) Colloid. Polym. Sci. 282:524–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleland J. I., Builder S. E., Swartz J. R., Winkler M., Chang J. Y., Wang D. I. (1992) Biotechnology 10:1013–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cui Z. G., Canselier J. P. (2001) Colloid. Polym. Sci. 279:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debye P., Huckel E. (1923) Phys. Z 24:185–206Google Scholar
  7. Fisher B., Summer I., Goodenough P. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 306:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujimoto Z., Takase K., Doui N., Momma M., Matsumoto T., Mizuno H. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 277:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ganesh C., Zaidi F. N., Udganokar J. B., Varadarajan R. (2001) Protein Sci. 10:1635–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg N. E., Ruldoph R., Jaenicke R. (1993) Biochemistry 30:2790–2797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta P., Hall C., Vogier A. (1998) Protein. Sci. 7:2642–2652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasse-Pettingell C., King J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 267:88–102Google Scholar
  13. Hasse-Pettingell C., King J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 263:4977–4983Google Scholar
  14. Khodarahmi R., Yazdanparast R. (2004) Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1674:175–181Google Scholar
  15. Khodagholi F., Yazdanparast R. (2005) Protein J 24:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiefhaber T., Rodulpf R., Kohler H., Buchuer J. (1991) Biotechnol. 9:825–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193:262–272Google Scholar
  18. McCoy L. F., Wong K. P. (1981) Biochem. 20:3062–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marston F. A. O. (1986) Biochem. J. 240:1Google Scholar
  20. Mitraki A., Fanc B., Haase-Pettingel C., Sturtevant J., King J. (1991) Science 253:54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozema D., Gellman S. H. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:2373–2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rozema D., Gellman S. H. (1996a) J. Biol. Chem. 271:3478–3487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rozema D., Gellman S. H. (1996b) Biochemistry 35:15760–15771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Speed M. A., Wang D. I. C., King J (1996) Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1283–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xie Y., Wetlaufer D. B. (1996) Protein Sci. 5:517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yazdanparast R., Khodagholi F. (2006) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 446:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fariba Khodagholi
    • 1
  • Bahareh Eftekharzadeh
    • 2
  • Razieh Yazdanparast
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biochemistry and BiophysicsThe University of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Medicinal chemistry, Faculty of PharmacyTehran University of Medical ScienceTehranIran

Personalised recommendations