Population pharmacokinetic modeling and deconvolution of enantioselective absorption of eflornithine in the rat
- 665 Downloads
Enantioselective pharmacokinetics and absorption of eflornithine in the rat was investigated using population pharmacokinetic modeling and a modified deconvolution method. Bidirectional permeability of l- and d-eflornithine was investigated in Caco-2 cells. The rat was administered racemic eflornithine hydrochloride as a single oral dose [40–3,000 mg/kg bodyweight (BW)] or intravenously (IV) (100–2,700 mg/kg BW infused over 60–400 min). Serial arterial blood samples were collected and l- and d-eflornithine were quantitated with a previously published chiral bioanalysis method. The D:L concentration ratio was determined in rat faeces. Intravenous l-and d-eflornithine plasma concentration–time data was analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling and described with a 3-compartment pharmacokinetic model with saturable binding to one of the peripheral compartments. Oral plasma concentration–time data was analyzed using a modified deconvolution method accounting for nonlinearities in the eflornithine pharmacokinetics. Clearance was similar for both enantiomers (3.36 and 3.09 mL/min). Oral bioavailability was estimated by deconvolution at 30 and 59 % for l- and d-eflornithine. The D:L concentration ratio in feces was 0.49 and the Caco-2 cell permeability was similar for both enantiomers (6–10 × 10−8 cm/s) with no evident involvement of active transport or efflux. The results presented here suggest that the difference in the bioavailability between eflornithine enantiomers is caused by a stereoselective difference in extent rather than rate of absorption. The presented modified deconvolution method made it possible to account for the non-linear component in the suggested three-compartment pharmacokinetic model thus rapidly estimating eflornithine oral bioavailability.
KeywordsDeconvolution Eflornithine Pharmacokinetics NONMEM Rat
The provision of eflornithine by WHO/TDR is gratefully acknowledged. Dr Ina Hubatsch, Uppsala University, Uppsala Sweden, is acknowledged for her contribution to the Caco-2 cell assay.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.McLaren CE, Fujikawa-Brooks S, Chen WP, Gillen DL, Pelot D, Gerner EW, Meyskens FL Jr (2008) Longitudinal assessment of air conduction audiograms in a phase III clinical trial of difluoromethylornithine and sulindac for prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila Pa) 1(7):514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Priotto G, Kasparian S, Mutombo W, Ngouama D, Ghorashian S, Arnold U, Ghabri S, Baudin E, Buard V, Kazadi-Kyanza S, Ilunga M, Mutangala W, Pohlig G, Schmid C, Karunakara U, Torreele E, Kande V (2009) Nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy for second-stage African Trypanosoma brucei gambiense trypanosomiasis: a multicentre, randomised, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 374(9683):56–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Beal S (1986–2006) NONMEM users guide. In: Boeckmann A ICON Development Solutions, Ellicot CityGoogle Scholar
- 30.de Boor C (2001) Smoothing and least-squares approximation. In: Applied mathematical sciences 27—a practical guide to splines. Springer, New York, pp 211–214Google Scholar