Validity of the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile
- 53 Downloads
Background The Multidimensional Task Ability Profile (MTAP) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that provides a global score linked to the physical demand characteristics of work, but needs to be validated against established measures. Purpose To assess the concurrent validity of the MTAP compared with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and Short Form 12 Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-12) questionnaires. Methods An observational study was conducted in 157 patients undergoing musculoskeletal rehabilitation. At baseline and after 30 days of treatment, patients completed the MTAP, ODI, NDI, DASH, LEFS, and SF-12 and provided self-reported work status. Results At baseline and after 30 days, convergent validity between the MTAP and DASH, LEFS, NDI, and ODI was good to excellent. Concurrent validity between the MTAP and SF-12 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) was moderate or fair, respectively. Sensitivity to change over the 30-day treatment interval was established for the MTAP, SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, and LEFS. Fair to moderate predictive validity for work status was found for the MTAP, ODI, NDI, DASH, and SF-12 PCS. Conclusions The MTAP demonstrated adequate concurrent validity, predictive validity, and sensitivity to change compared to other PROs. For patients with various impairment types, the MTAP may be a useful omnibus measure to supplement specialty instruments such as the DASH, NDI, ODI, or LEFS.
KeywordsPatient reported outcome measures Physical function Musculoskeletal rehabilitation
The authors thank the staff of Spine & Sport Inc. for assistance with coordination and data collection for this study. The authors also thank Dr. Bryan Kemp for assistance with the Older Adult Health Questionnaire and for serving as chair of the Foundation’s Institutional Review Board.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
This study was funded by the Vert Mooney Research Foundation, a 501c(3) charitable organization that developed and currently owns the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile. Leonard Matheson, John Mayer, and Joe Verna are board members of the Vert Mooney Research Foundation. Leonard Matheson and Joe Verna own the intellectual property for the MTAP and benefit financially from MTAP sales and subscriptions. John Mayer received financial compensation for contributing to this project.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 .
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
- 3.Mayer J, et al. The reliability and validity of a new computerized pictorial activity and task sort. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):185–195.Google Scholar
- 4.Kramer A, Holthaus D. Uniform patient assessment for post-acute care. Final report. Aurora, CO: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center; 2006.Google Scholar
- 5.American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008. p. 613.Google Scholar
- 7.Author. Official disability guidelines. Austin, TX: MCG Health; 2019.Google Scholar
- 9.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models. Final rule with comment period. Fed Reg. 2016;81(214):77008–77831.Google Scholar
- 10.Quality ID #182 (NQF 2624): Functional Outcome Assessment 2019. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/ClinicalQualityMeasures.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2018.
- 14.Binkley JM, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Therapy. 1999;79(4):371–383.Google Scholar
- 21.Andrich D. Rasch models of measurement. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.Google Scholar
- 22.Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and the attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institute; 1960.Google Scholar
- 23.U.S. Department of Labor. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, vol. 1. 4th ed. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1991.Google Scholar
- 25.Matheson L. Multidimensional Task Ability Profile professional manual. St. Charles, MO: EpicRehab LLC.; 2011.Google Scholar
- 26.Bergbom S, et al. Relationship among pain catastrophizing, depressed mood, and outcomes across physical therapy treatments. Phys Therapy. 2011;91(5):754–764.Google Scholar
- 28.Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Theodore BR. The pain disability questionnaire: relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):72–91.Google Scholar
- 30.Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):357–374.Google Scholar
- 33.Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 2000. p. 742.Google Scholar
- 41.World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.Google Scholar