Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 569–573 | Cite as

Opportunities for Early Intervention to Avoid Prolonged Work Disability: Introduction to the Special Section

  • Yonatan Ben-Shalom
  • Jody Schimmel Hyde
Article

Abstract

Purpose The articles in this special section examine opportunities for early intervention that is intended to retain the jobs of workers who have medical conditions that could put them at risk of prolonged work disability. Methods The first three articles examine options for analyzing various types of disability claims data for targeting early intervention; the fourth article provides new information from 50 case studies on how employers decide to invest in the retention of individual workers. Results Together, the four articles demonstrate that there may be an opportunity to positively affect longer-term outcomes for workers with medical conditions. This would be accomplished by building and expanding on existing systems in order to efficiently identify, and provide timely support to, workers with medical conditions in a critical period during which the decisions and actions of various stakeholders, including the workers themselves, may have a major influence on these outcomes. Conclusions Forthcoming opportunities to develop, implement, and test evidence-based interventions to promote job retention can provide further insight into the value of the options described in the articles.

Keywords

Disability Onset Early intervention Job retention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank David Stapleton for providing helpful comments on an early draft. Funding for this manuscript was provided by the Research and Training Center on Employment Policy and Measurement at the University of New Hampshire, which is funded by the National Institute for Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, in the Administration for Community Living, at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) under cooperative agreement 9ORT5037-02-00. The contents do not necessarily represent the policy of DHHS and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government (EDGAR, 75.620 (b)).

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute for Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, in the Administration for Community Living, at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Cooperative Agreement 9ORT5037-02-00).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Yonatan Ben-Shalom and Jody Schimmel Hyde declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Hollenbeck K. Promoting retention or reemployment of workers after a significant injury or illness. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Social Security Administration. Annual statistical report of the Social Security Disability Insurance Program, 2016. Baltimore: Social Security Administration; 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Shalom Y, Mamun A. Return-to-work outcomes among Social Security Disability Insurance program beneficiaries. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2015;26(2):100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anand P, Ben-Shalom Y. Pathways taken by new Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income awardees. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207318779987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maestas N, Mullen KJ, Strand A. Does disability insurance receipt discourage work? Using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects of SSDI receipt. Am Econ Rev. 2013;103(5):1797–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Shalom Y. Steps states can take to help workers keep their jobs after injury, illness, or disability. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2016.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monaco, K. Disability insurance plans: trends in employee access and employer costs. Beyond the Numbers. vol 4. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2015. pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anand P, Wittenburg D. An analysis of private long-term disability insurance access, cost, and trends. Mon Labor Rev. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.21916/mlr.2017.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Institute on Disability. Short-term and long-term disability insurance: the details. Berkeley, CA: World Institute on Disability; 2018. http://mn.db101.org/mn/programs/income_support/std_ltd/program2c.htm. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  10. 10.
    Ben-Shalom Y, Burak H. The case for public investment in stay-at-work/return-to-work programs. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ben-Shalom Y, Bruns S, Contreary K, Stapleton D. Stay-at-work/return-to-work: key facts, critical information gaps, and current practices and proposals. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCrery J, Pomeroy E. Seizing the opportunity: ideas for improving disability programs. In: McCrery J, Pomeroy E, editors. SSDI solutions: ideas to strengthen the Social Security Disability Insurance program (Chap. 1). West Conshohocken: Infinity Publishing; 2016. http://www.crfb.org/sites/default/files/mccrerypomeroy.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  13. 13.
    Bipartisan Policy Center. Improve the SSDI program and address the impending trust fund depletion: consensus recommendations of BPC’s Disability Insurance Working Group. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center; 2015. http://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/BPC-Economy-SSDI-Program.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  14. 14.
    Office of Management and Budget. Major savings and reforms, budget of the U.S. Government, Fiscal Year 2018. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office; 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/msar.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  15. 15.
    Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, Institute for Work & Health (IWH) Workplace-Based RTW Intervention Literature Review Research Team. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick B, Munir F, Tveito TH, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a comparison of scientific literature, grey literature and stakeholder observations. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicholas MK, Linton SJ, Watson PJ, Main CJ. “Decade of the Flags” Working Group. Early identification and management of psychological risk factors (“yellow flags”) in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richmond H, Hall AM, Copsey B, Hansen Z, Williamson E, Hoxey-Thomas N, Cooper Z, Lamb SE. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioural treatment for non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams RM, Westmorland MG, Lin CA, Schmuck G, Creen M. Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related low back pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(8):607–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McDowell C, Fossey E. Workplace accommodations for people with mental illness: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nigatu YT, Liu Y, Uppal M, McKinney S, Rao S, Gillis K, Wang J. Interventions for enhancing return to work in individuals with a common mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2016;46(16):3263–3274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tompa E, De Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, Irvin E. A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. Department of Labor. S@W/R2W Research & RETAIN demonstration projects. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy. https://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/SAW-RTW/how-to-apply.htm. Accessed 20 July 2018.
  26. 26.
    Wickizer TM, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Gluck J, Mootz R, Smith-Weller T, Plaeger-Brockway R. Improving quality, preventing disability and reducing costs in workers’ compensation healthcare: a population-based intervention study. Med Care. 2011;49(12):1105–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stapleton D, Anfield R, Burns R, Cashdollar W, Doornink B, Gifford B, Harris M, Ufier K. Targeting early intervention to workers who need help to stay in the labor force. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christian J, Wickizer T, Burton K. A community-focused Health & Work Service (HWS). In: McCrery J, Pomeroy E, editors. SSDI solutions: ideas to strengthen the Social Security Disability Insurance program. West Conshohocken, PA: Infinity Publishing; 2016. pp. 83–112. http://www.crfb.org/sites/default/files/christianwickizerburton.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2018.
  29. 29.
    Neuhauser F, Ben-Shalom Y, Stapleton D. Early identification of potential SSDI entrants in California: the predictive value of State Disability Insurance and Workers’ Compensation claims. J Occup Rehabil. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9791-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Contreary K, Ben-Shalom Y, Gifford B. Using predictive analytics for early identification of short-term disability claimants who exhaust their benefits. J Occup Rehabil. (in press).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bourbonniere AM, Mann DR. Benefit duration and return to work outcomes in short term disability insurance programs: evidence from Rhode Island’s Temporary Disability Insurance program. J Occup Rehabil. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9779-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gould-Werth A, Morrison K, Ben-Shalom Y. Employers’ perspectives on accommodating and retaining employees with newly acquired disabilities: an exploratory study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9806-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematica Policy ResearchWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations