Return-to-Work Following Depression: What Work Accommodations Do Employers and Human Resources Directors Put in Place?
- 604 Downloads
The magnitude of economic and social costs related to common mental disorders has a profound impact on the workplace. Returning to work following depression is, therefore, a major issue for all stakeholders involved (employee, employer, human resources director, union, physician, etc.). Considering their role in the organization, Human Resources Directors (HRD) and employers have a decisive impact on the return-to-work (RTW) process. Purpose This study aims to determine which RTW accommodations are implemented, following depression, by one of the central stakeholders: HRD and employers. Methods 219 HRD/employers participated in a semi-structured telephone interview about RTW of employees after depression. From that interview, the question related to this article was: Do you put in place work accommodations for employees after a sick leave due to depression (yes or no)? If their response was positive, we asked: If yes, what were the work accommodations? Results 170 HRD/employers specified accommodations. The most common categories identified were related to: work schedule, task modifications, job change and work environment change. Accommodations directly related to the employee or the colleagues were considerably less mentioned and those concerning other RTW stakeholders, including supervisor, were almost absent. Conclusion Our results suggest that accommodations directly related to work aspects seemed to predominate in our sample of HRD/employers when an employee returned-to-work following depression. The relational aspect and the involvement of the different stakeholders are also not prioritized to accommodate the RTW. These results contrast with employer best practice guidelines for the RTW of workers with common mental disorders.
KeywordsReturn to work Depression Disability leave Employer Work accommodation
This work was supported by a funding grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Grant Number: 201386.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Marie-France Bastien and Marc Corbière declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Sherbrooke University (human research ethics committee).
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
- 1.World Health Organization WHO. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: Licence:CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2017.Google Scholar
- 3.Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Patten SB, Freedman G, Murray CJL, Vos T, Whiteford HA. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med. 2013;10(11):e1001547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kessler RC, Akiskal HS, Ames M, Birnbaum H, Greenberg P, Hirschfeld RM, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Simon GE, Wang PS. Prevalence and effects of mood disorders on work performance in a nationally representative sample of U.S. workers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(9):1561–1568.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Williams-Whitt K, Bültmann U, Amick B, Munir F, Tveito TH, Anema JR, Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention. Workplace interventions to prevent disability from both the scientific and practice perspectives: a comparison of scientific literature, grey literature and stakeholder observations. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):417–433.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Durand M-J, Corbière M, Coutu M-F, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work Read Mass. 2014;48(4):579–589.Google Scholar
- 20.Center C. Law and job accommodation in mental health disability. In: Schultz IZ, Rogers ES, editors. Work accommodation and retention in mental health. New York: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Pomaki G, Franche R-L, Khushrushahi N, Murray E, Lampinen T, Mah P. Best practices for return-to-work/stay-at-work interventions for workers with mental health conditions. Vancouver: Occupational Health and Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH); 2010.Google Scholar
- 32.Negrini A, Corbière M, Lecomte T, Coutu M-F, Nieuwenhuijsen K, St. Arnaud L, Durand M-J, Gragnano A, Berbiche D. How can supervisors contribute to the successful return to work of employees diagnosed with depression? J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(2):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9715-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Bayle N. Entre le penser et le faire: la production des comportements d’inclusion des travailleurs handicapés par les employeurs (PhD.) [Between thinking and doing: producing inclusion behaviors for disabled workers by employers]. France: Université de Toulouse-Jean Jaurès; 2000.Google Scholar
- 34.Gallagher F. La recherche descriptive interprétative: description des besoins psychosociaux de femmes à la suite d’un résultat anormal à la mammographie de dépistage du cancer du sein [Interpretative descriptive research: description of the psychosocial needs of women following abnormal result in breast cancer screening mammography]. In: Corbière M, Larivière N, editors. Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales, et de la santé [Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods in Human, Social, and Health Sciences Research]. Québec: Presse de l’Université du Québec (PUQ); 2014. pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
- 35.Durand M-J, Loisel P. La transformation de la réadaptation au travail d’une perspective parcellaire à une perspective systémique [The transformation of occupational rehabilitation from a fragmented perspective to a systemic perspective]. Perspect Interdiscip Sur Trav Santé. 2001. https://doi.org/10.4000/pistes.3799.
- 36.St. Arnaud L, Corbière M. Déterminants de la réintégration en emploi et du retour au travail en santé mentale [Factors of return to work and work reintegration for people with common and severe mental illness]. In: Corbière M, Durand M-J, editors. Du trouble mental à l’incapacité au travail: Une perspective transdisciplinaire qui vise à mieux saisir cette problématique et à offrir des pistes d’intervention [From mental disorders to work disability: a transdisciplinary perspective to better understanding this thematic and to offer tools and interventions for actions]. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2011. pp. 109–137.Google Scholar
- 42.Gragnano A, Negrini A, Miglioretti M, Corbière M. Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review of reviews supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;28(2):215–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9714-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Theorell T, Hammarström A, Aronsson G, Träskman Bendz L, Grape T, Hogstedt C, Marteinsdottir I, Skoog I, Hall C. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):738. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
- 48.U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Procedures for providing reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/internal/reasonable_accommodation.cfm (2010). Accessed 11 Jan 2018.
- 49.Secretariat of Treasury Board of Canada. Duty to accommodate: a general process for managers. https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/values-ethics/diversity-equity/duty-accommodate-general-process-managers.html (2011). Accessed 11 Jan 2018.
- 50.Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) National Network. What are the limitations on the obligation to make a reasonable accommodation? https://adata.org/faq/what-are-limitations-obligation-make-reasonable-accommodation (2018). Accessed 11 Jan 2018.
- 51.National Institute For Health and Care Excellence. Workplace health: long-term sickness absence and incapacity to work. Manchester: National Institute For Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2009.Google Scholar
- 52.Center for Youth Mental Health. Helping employees successfully return to work following depression, anxiety or a related mental health problem: guidelines for organisations. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2011.Google Scholar
- 53.Institute for Work and Health (IWH). An evidence-informed guide to supporting people with depression in the workplace. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health (IWH); 2017.Google Scholar
- 55.Corbière M, Negrini A, Durand M-J, St. Arnaud L, Briand C, Fassier J-P, Loisel P, Lachance J-P. Development of the return-to-work obstacles and self-efficacy scale (ROSES) and validation with workers suffering from a common mental disorder or musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):329–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.The Conference Board of Canada. Depression in the workplace. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=5676 (2013). Accessed 7 Mar 2018.
- 60.Thun S, Saksvik PØ, Ose SO, Mehmetoglu M, Christensen M. The impact of supervisors’ attitudes on organizational adjustment norms and attendance pressure norms. Scand. J. Organ. Psychol. 2015;5(2):15–31.Google Scholar