Do Health Service Use and Return-to-Work Outcomes Differ with GPs’ Injured-Worker Caseload?
- 65 Downloads
Purpose To determine whether healthcare use and return-to-work (RTW) outcomes differ with GPs’ injured-worker caseload. Methods Retrospective analyses of the Compensation Research Database, which captures approximately 85% of all injured worker claims in Victoria, Australia was conducted. Four injured-worker caseload groups were examined that represented the 25th, 50th, 75th, and 100th percentiles of claimants seen per GP over the 8-year study period (2003–2010): (i) 1–13 claimants; (ii) 14–26 claimants; (iii) 27–48 claimants; and (iv) 49+ claimants (total claims, n = 124,342; total GPs, n = 9748).The characteristics of claimants in each caseload group, as well as the influence of caseload on three outcomes relevant to RTW (weekly compensation paid, work incapacity days, medical-and-like costs), were examined. Results Distinct profiles for high versus low caseload groups emerged. High caseload GPs treated significantly more men in blue collar occupations and issued significantly more ‘alternate duties’ certificates. Conversely, low caseload GPs treated significantly more women in white collar occupations, predominantly for mental health injuries, and issued significantly more ‘unfit-for-work’ certificates. Few significant differences were found between the two intermediate GP caseload groups. High caseload was associated with significantly greater medical-and-like costs, however, no caseload group differences were detected for weekly compensation paid or duration of time-off-work. Conclusions Training GPs who have a low injured-worker caseload in workers’ compensation processes, utilising high caseload GPs in initiatives involving peer-to-peer support, or system changes where employers are encouraged to provide preventive or rehabilitative support in the workplace may improve RTW outcomes for injured workers.
KeywordsGeneral practice Return to work Workers’ compensation
We would like to thank Dr Maria de Leon-Santiago for her contribution to the drafting of this manuscript.
This project was funded by the WorkSafe Victoria and the Transport Accident Commission via the Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research (ISCRR).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
DM and BB have received funding from ISCRR for subsequent research studies. RR and AC were employed by ISCRR at the time the study was conducted. MO’H and AK declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Safe Work Australia. Key work health and safety statistics, Australia, 2014. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia; 2014.Google Scholar
- 2.Safe Work Australia. Key work health and safety statistics, Australia, 2015. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia; 2015.Google Scholar
- 5.Waddell G, Burton A. Is work good for your health and well-being? Norwich: TSO; 2006.Google Scholar
- 9.Mazza D, Brijnath B, Singh N, Kosny A, Ruseckaite R, Collie A. General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(100):1–9.Google Scholar
- 17.Safe Work Australia. Work-related mental disorders profile, 2015. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia; 2015.Google Scholar
- 18.Safe Work Australia. Australian work-related injury experience by sex and age, 2009–10. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia; 2012.Google Scholar
- 19.Ruseckaite R. Unfit for work or alternate duties: what predicts the type of medical certificate for injured workers in Victoria, Australia [Abstract]. Int J Disabil Manag. 2014;9(e6):1.Google Scholar
- 21.Safe Work Australia. The cost of work-related injury and illness for Australian employers, workers and the community: 2012–13. Canberra, ACT: Safe Work Australia; 2015.Google Scholar
- 26.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Year Book Australia, 2012. Catalogue 1301.0. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS); 2012.Google Scholar
- 28.Department for Work and Pensions and Department of Health. Work, health and disability green paper: improving lives. London: UK Government; 2017.Google Scholar