Advertisement

Development of Prediction Models for Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Lisa C. BosmanEmail author
  • Corné A. M. Roelen
  • Jos W. R. Twisk
  • Iris Eekhout
  • Martijn W. Heymans
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop prediction models to determine the risk of sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in non-sick listed employees and to compare models for short-term (i.e., 3 months) and long-term (i.e., 12 months) predictions. Methods Cohort study including 49,158 Dutch employees who participated in occupational health checks between 2009 and 2015 and sick leave data recorded during 12 months follow-up. Prediction models for MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check were developed with logistic regression analysis using routinely assessed health check variables. The performance of the prediction models was evaluated with explained variance (Nagelkerke’s R-square), calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) measures. Results A total of 376 (0.8%) and 1193 (2.4%) employees had MSD sick leave within 3 and 12 months after the health check. The prediction models included similar predictor variables (educational level, musculoskeletal complaints, distress, supervisor social support, work-home interference, intrinsic motivation, development opportunities, and work pace). The explained variances were 7.6% and 8.8% for the model with 3 and 12 months follow-up, respectively. Both prediction models showed adequate calibration and discriminated between employees with and without MSD sick leave 3 months (AUC = 0.761; Interquartile range [IQR] 0.759–0.763) and 12 months (AUC = 0.740; IQR 0.738–0.741) after the health check. Conclusion The prediction models could be used to determine the risk of MSD sick leave in non-sick listed employees and invite them to preventive consultations with occupational health providers.

Keywords

Absenteeism Musculoskeletal disease Prediction models Prognostic research Risk assessment 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haukka E, Kaila-Kangas L, Luukkonen R, Takala E-P, Viikari-Juntura E, Leino-Arjas P. Predictors of sickness absence related to musculoskeletal pain: a two-year follow-up study of workers in municipal kitchens. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(3):278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hartman E, Vrielink O, Huub H, Huirne R, Metz JH. Risk factors for sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders among self-employed Dutch farmers: a case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(3):204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartys S, Burton K, Main C. A prospective study of psychosocial risk factors and absence due to musculoskeletal disorders–implications for occupational screening. Occup Med. 2005;55(5):375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Motamedzade M, Faghih MA, Golmohammadi R, Faradmal J, Mohammadi H. Effects of physical and personal risk factors on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2013;19(4):513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    IJzelenberg W, Molenaar D, Burdorf A. Different risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints and musculoskeletal sickness absence. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004;30(1):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, van der Beek AJ, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors for sick leave in patients with neck or upper extremity complaints. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007;80(8):733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holmberg SA, Thelin AG. Predictors of sick leave owing to neck or low back pain: a 12-year longitudinal cohort study in a rural male population. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010;17(2):251–257.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roelen C, Thorsen S, Heymans M, Twisk J, Bültmann U, Bjørner J. Development and validation of a prediction model for long-term sickness absence based on occupational health survey variables. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(2):168–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Airaksinen J, Jokela M, Virtanen M, Oksanen T, Koskenvuo M, Pentti J, et al. Prediction of long-term absence due to sickness in employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3713 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bosman LC, Dijkstra L, Joling CI, Heymans MW, Twisk JW, Roelen CA. Prediction models to identify workers at risk of sick leave due to low back pain in Dutch construction industry. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(2):156–162.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melloh M, Elfering A, Salathe CR, Kaser A, Barz T, Roder C, et al. Predictors of sickness absence in patients with a new episode of low back pain in primary care. Ind Health. 2012;50(4):288–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lindell O, Johansson SE, Strender LE. Predictors of stable return-to-work in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sick-listing, high self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):53.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Truchon M, Cote D, Schmouth ME, Leblond J, Fillion L, Dionne C. Validation of an adaptation of the stress process model for predicting low back pain related long-term disability outcomes a cohort study. Spine. 2010;35(13):1307–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. Validation of the Maslach burnout inventory-general survey: an internet study. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2002;15(3):245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Terluin B, van Marwijk HW, Adèr HJ, de Vet HC, Penninx BW, Hermens ML, et al. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): a validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry. 2006;6(1):34.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Veldhoven M, Meijman T. Questionnaire on the experience and evaluation of work (QEEW) preliminary english version. Brussels: Amsterdam National Research Institute for Working Conditions; 1994.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geurts SA, Taris TW, Kompier MA, Dikkers JS, Van Hooff ML, Kinnunen UM. Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work Stress. 2005;19(4):319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60(1):48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(3):1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ambler G, Brady AR, Royston P. Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data. Stat Med. 2002;21(24):3803–3822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Steyerberg E. Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Heinzl H, Waldhör T, Mittlböck M. Careful use of pseudo R-squared measures in epidemiological studies. Stat Med. 2005;24(18):2867–2872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marshall A, Altman DG, Holder RL, Royston P. Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):57.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alexopoulos EC, Konstantinou EC, Bakoyannis G, Tanagra D, Burdorf A. Risk factors for sickness absence due to low back pain and prognostic factors for return to work in a cohort of shipyard workers. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(9):1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eriksen W, Bruusgaard D, Knardahl S. Work factors as predictors of intense or disabling low back pain; a prospective study of nurses’ aides. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(5):398–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harrison DA, Martocchio JJ. Time for absenteeism: a 20-year review of origins, offshoots, and outcomes. J Manage. 1998;24(3):305–350.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wåhlin-Norgren C, Ekberg K, Öberg B. Is an expert diagnosis enough for assessment of sick leave for employees with musculoskeletal and mental disorders? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13–14):1147–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rael E, Stansfeld SA, Shipley M, Head J, Feeney A, Marmot M. Sickness absence in the Whitehall II study, London: the role of social support and material problems. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49(5):474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Karlsson N, Skargren E, Kristenson M. Emotional support predicts more sickness absence and poorer self assessed work ability: a two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):648.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Derycke H, Vlerick P, Van de Ven B, Rots I, Clays E. The impact of effort–reward imbalance and learning motivation on teachers’ sickness absence. Stress Health. 2013;29(1):14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schreuder J, Roelen C, Van der Klink J, Groothoff J. Characteristics of zero-absenteeism in hospital care. Occup Med. 2013;63(4):266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van Vuuren B, Zinzen E, Van Heerden HJ, Becker PJ, Meeusen R. Work and family support systems and the prevalence of lower back problems in a South African steel industry. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration the TRIPOD statement: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):W1–W73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa C. Bosman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Corné A. M. Roelen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jos W. R. Twisk
    • 1
  • Iris Eekhout
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martijn W. Heymans
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ArboNed Occupational Health ServiceUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Child HealthLeidenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations