Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 65–73 | Cite as

The Role of the Australian Workplace Return to Work Coordinator: Essential Qualities and Attributes

  • Joanna Bohatko-NaismithEmail author
  • Carole James
  • Maya Guest
  • Darren A. Rivett
Article

Abstract

Introduction In the Australian context, a return to work (RTW) Coordinator assists an injured worker with workplace-based support and regulatory guidance for the duration of their injury. Coordinating the RTW process has been considered an effective approach for managing workplace injuries, however few studies have described the skills, traits or characteristics required to fulfil the role of workplace RTW Coordinator. This study aims to provide insight as to the skills and attributes needed for the role of the workplace RTW Coordinator from their experience and perception. Method Focus groups were conducted with workplace RTW Coordinators from six major Australian cities. Twenty five participants were recruited through a national RTW Coordinator website, and professional RTW interest groups using a snowballing technique. Participating workplace RTW Coordinators were required to have a minimum 2 years’ experience and to have been involved with the development and implementation of workplace policies and procedures. Thematic analysis was performed to identify meaningful patterns and themes. Results The data analysed provided clear insight as to the specific role requirements necessary for working as an Australian workplace RTW Coordinator. Three key themes clearly emerged; communication skills, RTW Coordinator characteristics, and managing the RTW process. Conclusion The findings indicate that RTW Coordinators require a wide range of traits, skills, and attributes to successfully perform this role. Effective management by the RTW Coordinator of the complex RTW process is essential to facilitate a smooth transition for the injured worker, alongside maintaining a professional relationship with the employer and external stakeholders. The results of this study can be utilised to further improve the selection of future RTW Coordinators.

Keywords

Workplace based return to work Return to work coordinators Disability managers Qualitative research 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the RTW Coordinators who participated in this study. We also thank the organisations for their support with recruiting RTW Coordinators.

Conflict of interest

Joanna Bohatko-Naismith, Carole James, Maya Guest and Darren A. Rivett declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    WorkCover Tasmania. The role of the return to work coordinator [Internet]. WorkCover Tasmania. 2010. http://www.workcover.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/145509/GB229.pdf.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    WorkCover Queensland. Employers obligations—an overview [Internet]. Q-Comp. 2010. http://www.qcomp.com.au/rehabilitation/employer-obligations—an-overview.
  5. 5.
    Australian Government Comcare. Rehabilitation guidelines for employers [Internet]. Australian Governement. 2005. [cited 2010 23/11]. http://www.comcare.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/41127/Rehabiliation_guidelines_for_employers_PUB_19_Jul05.pdf.
  6. 6.
    WorkCover SA. Rehabilitation and return to work coordinators, all you need to know [Internet]. 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Safework Australia. The cost of work-related injusry and illness for Australian employers, workers and the community 2008-09 [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2013 12th August]. http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/Documents/660/Cost%20of%20Work-related%20injury%20and%20disease.pdf.
  9. 9.
    The Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Realising the health benefits of work [Internet]. 2011. http://www.racp.edu.au/page/afoem-health-benefits-of-work.
  10. 10.
    Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Institute for Work & Health. Institute for Work & Health. Seven ‘principles’ for successful return to work [Internet]. [cited 2013 October]. http://www.iwh.on.ca/files/seven_principles_rtw_2007.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, Loisel P, Hong QN, Desorcy B. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:41–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bohatko-Naismith J, Rivett D, Guest M, James C. A review of the role and training of return to work coordinators in Australia. J Health Saf Environ. 2012;28(2).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pergola T, Salazar MK, Graham KY, Brines J. Case management services for injured workers. Providers’ perspectives. AAOHN J. 1999;47(9):397–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foreman P, Murphy G, Swierissen H. Facilitators and barriers to return to work: a literature review [Internet]. La Trobe University; 2006. http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-au&q=Facilitators+and+barriers+to+return+to+work%3A+a+literature+rview&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=.
  18. 18.
    Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. 3rd ed. United Kingdom: Wiley; 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krueger RA, Casey M. Focus groups; a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009, 219 pp.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Open University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    QSR International. NVivo 10 [Internet]. 2012. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx.
  22. 22.
    Kvale S. Doing interviews. London: Sage; 2007.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Erickson F, editor. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. New York: Macmillen; 1986.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    James C, Southgate E, Kable A, Rivett D, Guest M, Bohatko-Naimsith J. The return-to-work coordinator role: qualitative insights for nursing. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:220–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Workcover NSW. Guidelines for employers’ return to work programs [Internet]. WorkCover Publications. 2003. [cited 05/03/10]. http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/formspublications/publications/Documents/guidelines_for_employers_return_to_work_programs_0506.pdf.
  26. 26.
    WorkCover South Australia. Rehabilitation and return to work coordinators—What employers need to know [Internet]. 2010. http://www.workcover.com/site/employer.aspx#987*Appointing. A rehabilitation and return to work coordinator.
  27. 27.
    WorkCover NSW. Rehabilitation Providers and Workers: What to expect from your rehabilitation provider [Internet]. WorkCover NSW; n.d. [cited 2010 23/11]. http://www.workcover.nsw.gov.au/formspublications/publications/Documents/rehabilitation_providers_and_workcover_0544.pdf.
  28. 28.
    Gardner BT, Pransky G, Shaw WS, Hong QN, Loisel P. Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muenchberger H, Kendall E. Creating successful rehabilitation partnerships between health professionals and employers. Int J Disabil Manag Res. 2006;1(1):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche R, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers–current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(11):625–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    WorkSafe ACT. Workers compensation—injury management processes [Internet]. 2010. http://www.worksafety.act.gov.au/publication/view/1270.
  32. 32.
    Australian Government Comcare. Case manager competencies [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2010 19/10]. http://www.comcare.gov.au/injury_management/return_to_work_planning/case_management/case_manager_competencies.
  33. 33.
    WorkSafe NT. Workers Compensation [Internet]. [cited 2011]. http://www.worksafe.nt.gov.au/comp_rehab/.
  34. 34.
    WorkCover WA. Obligations of the key parties [Internet]. n.d. http://www.workcover.wa.gov.au/Returning+to+Work/Obligations+of+the+key+parties/Default.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Bohatko-Naismith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carole James
    • 1
  • Maya Guest
    • 1
  • Darren A. Rivett
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Health SciencesThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations