Interactions Between Injured Workers and Insurers in Workers’ Compensation Systems: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research Literature
- 1.4k Downloads
Introduction Work-related injury is a major public health problem and a worker’s recovery can be shaped by their interactions with employers, healthcare providers and the workers’ compensation system. Most research on the effects of compensation has concentrated on examining outcomes rather than considering the compensation process itself. There has been little attention paid to the interactions between stakeholders and only recently has the client’s view been considered as worthy of investigation. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize findings from peer reviewed qualitative studies that investigated injured workers interactions with insurers in workers’ compensation systems. Method A search of six electronic library databases revealed 1,006 articles. After screening for relevance, 18 articles were read in full and a search of those bibliographies revealed a further nine relevant articles. Quality assessment of the 27 studies resulted in a final 13 articles of medium and high quality being retained for data extraction. Results Included studies focused mainly on experiences of injured workers, many of whom had long term claims. Findings were synthesized using a meta-ethnographic approach. Six themes were identified which characterised the interactions between insurers and injured workers. The majority of interactions were negative and resulted in considerable psychosocial consequences for injured workers. Positive interactions were less frequently reported and included respectful, understanding and supportive communication and efficient service from insurers. Conclusion Findings from this synthesis support the growing consensus that involvement in compensation systems contributes to poorer outcomes for claimants. Interactions between insurers and injured workers were interwoven in cyclical and pathogenic relationships, which influence the development of secondary injury in the form of psychosocial consequences instead of fostering recovery of injured workers. This review suggests that further research is required to investigate positive interactions and identify mechanisms to better support and prevent secondary psychosocial harm to injured workers.
KeywordsWorkers’ compensation Injured worker Insurer Interactions Psychosocial consequences Qualitative Systematic review
The project was funded by WorkSafe Victoria, the Transport Accident Commission and Monash University, Victoria, Australia. The authors wish to thank Dr. E MacEachen for the use of quality appraisal and data extraction proforma previously developed for a systematic review of qualitative literature on return to work.
Conflict of interest
The project No FS-M-11-029 was funded by WorkSafe Victoria and the Transport Accident Commission, (TAC) Victoria, Australia. ISCRR is a joint initiative of TAC, WorkSafe Victoria and Monash University.
- 6.Weiler SW, Foeh KP, van Mark A, Touissant R, Sonntag N, Gaessler A, Schulze J, Kessel R. Outpatient rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders using structured workplace description. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:427–34.Google Scholar
- 7.Cole D, Mondloch M, Hogg-Johnson S, for the Early Claimant Cohort Prognostic Modelling Group. Institute for Work, Health. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes—a prospective study. Can Med Assoc. 2002;166(6):749–54.Google Scholar
- 8.Harris I, Murgatroyd D, Cameron I, Young J, Solomon M. The effect of compensation on health care utilisation in a trauma cohort. Med Journal Aust. 2009;190(11):619–22.Google Scholar
- 9.Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. The Institute for Work and Health (IWH) Workplace-Based RTW Intervention Literature Review Research Team. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31.Google Scholar
- 12.Moustakas C. Phenomenological research methods. London: Sage Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
- 13.Grant G, Studdert D. Poisoned chalice? A critical analysis of the evidence linking personal injury compensation processes with adverse health outcomes. Melb Uni Law Rev. 2009;33(3):865–85.Google Scholar
- 15.Akkermans A. Reforming personal injury claims settlement: Paying more attention to emotional dimension promotes victim recovery. 2009; doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1333214. Accessed 1 Oct 2012.
- 17.Calzoni T. The client perspective: the missing link in work injury and rehabilitation studies. J Occup Health Saf Aust NZ. 1997;13(1):47–57.Google Scholar
- 18.Bye R. When clients are dying: occupational therapists’ perspectives. Occup Ther J Res. 1998;18(1):3–24.Google Scholar
- 22.Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. London: Cabinet Office; 2003.Google Scholar
- 23.Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. California: Sage Publications; 1998.Google Scholar
- 27.Hubertsson J, Petersson I, Arvidsson B, Thorstensson C. Sickness absence in musculoskeletal disorders—patients’ experiences of interactions with the Social Insurance Agency and health care. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2011; doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-107.
- 41.Routely V, Ozanne-Smith J, Davis MC. Suicide following work-injury in Victoria, Australia. J Health Saf Med. 2012;23(3):293.Google Scholar
- 47.Ison T. The therapeutic significance of compensation structures. Can Bar Rev. 1986;64:605–17.Google Scholar
- 48.Wilkinson W. Therapeutic jurisprudence and workers’ compensation. Ariz Atty. 1994;30:28–33.Google Scholar
- 49.Shuman D. The psychology of compensation in tort law. U. Kans Law Rev. 1994;43:39–77.Google Scholar
- 50.Imershein A, Hill S, Reynolds A. The workers’ compensation system as a quality of life problem for workers’ compensation claimants. Adv Med Sociol. 1994;5:181–200.Google Scholar
- 52.Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain—new evidence gives new hope—if we can just get all the players onside. Can Med Assoc J. 1998;158:1625–31.Google Scholar
- 53.Schaafsma F, De Wolf A, Kayaian A, Cameron I. Changing insurance company claims handling processes improves some outcomes for people injured in road traffic crashes BMC Public Health 2012; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/36. Accessed 9 Dec 2012.