Employee Decision-Making About Disclosure of a Mental Disorder at Work
- 1.1k Downloads
Purpose Fear of stigma may lead employees to choose not to disclose a mental disorder in the workplace, thereby limiting help-seeking through workplace accommodation. Research suggests that various factors are considered in making decisions related to disclosure of concealable stigmatizing attributes, yet limited literature explores such decision-making in the context of mental disorder and work. The purpose of this grounded theory study was to develop a model of disclosure specific to mental health issues in a work context. Methods In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 employees of a post-secondary educational institution in Canada. Data were analyzed according to grounded theory methods through processes of open, selective, and theoretical coding. Results Findings indicated that employees begin from a default position of nondisclosure that is attributable to fear of being stigmatized in the workplace as a result of the mental disorder. In order to move from the default position, employees need a reason to disclose. The decision-making process itself is a risk–benefit analysis, during which employees weigh risks and benefits within the existing context as they assess it. The model identifies that fear of stigmatization is one of the problems with disclosure at work and describes the disclosure decision-making process. Conclusions Understanding of how employees make decisions about disclosure in the workplace may inform organizational policies, practices, and programs to improve the experiences of individuals diagnosed with a mental disorder at work. The findings suggest possible intervention strategies in education, policy, and culture for reducing stigma of mental disorders in the workplace.
KeywordsCommon mental disorders Stigma Disclosure Decision-making
This work was supported bythe Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Grant(s) FRN: 53909.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5).
Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.
- 1.Konrad AM, Leslie K, Peuramaki D. Full accessibility by 2025: will your business be ready? Ivey Bus J Online. 2007;71:1–12.Google Scholar
- 7.Putnam K, McKibbin L. Managing workplace depression: an untapped opportunity for occupational health professionals. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurses J. 2004;52:122–9.Google Scholar
- 8.Corbière M, Villotti P, Lecomte T, Bond GR, Lesage A, Goldner EM. Work accommodations and natural supports for maintaining employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014. doi: 10.1037/prj0000033.
- 9.Corbière M, Villotti P, Toth K, Waghorn G. La divulgation du trouble mental et les mesures d’accommodements: Deux notions pour comprendre le maintien en emploi de personnes aux prises avec un trouble mental grave. L’Encéphale. (in press).Google Scholar
- 11.Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1963.Google Scholar
- 12.Corrigan PW. Dealing with stigma through personal disclosure. In: Corrigan PW, editor. On the stigma of mental illness: implications for research and social change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004. p. 257–80.Google Scholar
- 20.Eakin JM. The discourse of abuse in return-to-work: a hidden epidemic of suffering. In: Mayhew C, Peterson CL, editors. Occupational health and safety: international influences and the “new” epidemics. Amityville: Baywood; 2005. p. 159–74.Google Scholar
- 23.Lai YM, Hong CP, Chee CY. Stigma of mental illness. Singap Med J. 2001;42:111.Google Scholar
- 24.Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG, editors. Psychology of intergroup relations. 2nd ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1986. p. 7–24.Google Scholar
- 25.Hogg MA. Social identity theory. In: Burke PJ, editor. Contemporary social psychological theories. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006. p. 111–36.Google Scholar
- 37.Hudson J. The disclosure process of an invisible stigmatized identity. College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences theses and dissertations. Paper 93. 2011. http://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/93.
- 40.Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1978.Google Scholar
- 41.Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis: emergence versus forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1992.Google Scholar
- 44.Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.Google Scholar
- 50.Jones AM. The disclosure of severe mental illness in the workplace. Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database. 2009.Google Scholar
- 59.Stuart H, Arboleda-Flórez J, Sartorius N. Paradigms lost: fighting stigma and the lessons learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 60.Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, Bruffaerts R, Brugha TS, Bryson H, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;109(Suppl 420):21–7.Google Scholar