Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 242–267 | Cite as

Exploring the Diversity of Conceptualizations of Work (Dis)ability: A Scoping Review of Published Definitions

  • Valérie LedererEmail author
  • Patrick Loisel
  • Michèle Rivard
  • François Champagne
Review

Abstract

Purpose Researchers are confronted to numerous definitions of work ability/disability, influenced by their context of emergence, discipline, purpose, underlying paradigm and relationship to time. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the concept through a systematic scoping review and the development of an integrative concept map of work (dis)ability. The research questions are: How has work (dis)ability been conceptualized from the perspectives of research, practice, policy and industry in the published scientific literature? How has the conceptualization of work (dis)ability evolved over time? Methods A search strategy was designed with a library scientist to retrieve scientific publications containing explicit definition(s) of work (dis)ability in leading-edge databases. The screening and the extraction of the definitions were achieved by duplicate assessment. The definitions were subject to a comparative analysis based on the grounded theory approach. Results In total, 423 abstracts were retrieved from the bibliographic databases. After removing duplicates, 280 unique records were screened for inclusion. A final set of 115 publications containing unique original conceptual definitions served as basis for analysis. Conclusions The scientific literature does not reflect a shared, integrated vision of the exact nature and dimensions of work (dis)ability. However, except for a few definitions, there seems to be a consensus that work (dis)ability is a relational concept resulting from the interaction of multiple dimensions that influence each other through different ecological levels. The conceptualization of work (dis)ability also seems to have become more dynamic over time. The way work (dis)ability is defined has important implications for research, compensation and rehabilitation.

Keywords

Occupational Work ability Work disability Concept mapping Meaning Systematic review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Anne Foro (University of Montreal) for her careful independent review of the abstracts, papers and definitions. The study was supported by the Work Disability Prevention Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategic Training Program. V.L. was supported by a Banting and Best Doctoral Research Award from the CIHR and a Doctoral Scholarship from the Robert-Sauvé Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute.

Supplementary material

10926_2013_9459_MOESM1_ESM.docx (96 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 96 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schultz IZ. Impairment and occupational disability in research and practice. In: Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. US: Springer; 2005. p. 25–41.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):464–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amick BC 3rd, Lerner D, Rogers WH, Rooney T, Katz JN. A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3152–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldwin ML, Johnson WG, Butler RJ. The error of using returns-to-work to measure the outcomes of health care. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):632–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Rijk A. Appendix: work disability theories: a taxonomy for researchers. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 475–500.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tate DG, Pledger C. An integrative conceptual framework of disability: new directions for research. Am Psychol. 2003;58:274–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):374–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):233–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeJong G. Defining and implementing the independent living for physically disabled people. In: Crewe N, Zola I, editors. Independent living for physically disabled people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1983. p. 4–27.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    DeJong G, Hughes J. Independent living: methodology for measuring long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63(2):68–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waddell G. The back pain revolution. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weir R, Nielson WR. Interventions for disability management. Clin J Pain. 2001;17(4 Suppl):S128–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention: new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustin TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1173–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S, editors. Dimensions of work ability: results of the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinky: Finnish Centre of Pensions, The Social Insurance Institution, National Public Health Institute, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ilmarinen J. Work ability: a comprehensive concept for occupational health research and prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(1):1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stahl C. In cooperation we trust: interorganizational cooperation in return-to-work and labour market reintegration [Medical dissertation]. Linköping: Linköping University; 2010.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Altman BM. Disability definitions, models, classification schemes, and applications. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Michael B, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications; 2001. p. 97–122.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers’ compensation data. Am J Ind Med. 1999;35(6):604–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wacker JG. A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments. J Oper Manag. 2004;22(6):629–50.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wacker JG. A conceptual understanding of requierments for theory-building research: guidelines for scientific theory building. JSCM. 2008;44(3):5–15.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson; 1967.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2008.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cooper H. Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008;6(7):1–12.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Frank JR, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, Wang M, De Rossi S, Horsley T. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):631–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth?: a systematic review of published definitions. World Hosp Health Serv. 2005;41(1):32–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Godfrey CM, Harrison MB, Lysaght R, Lamb M, Graham ID, Oakley P. Care of self-care by other-care of other: the meaning of self care from research, practice, policy and industry perspectives. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011;9(1):3–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Järvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M. Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17(Suppl 1):67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    US Census Bureau. Methodology for identifying persons with a work disability in the Current Population Survey. Washington: US Census Bureau; 1981–2011 [updated October 11, 2011]; Available from: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disability/cps/cpsworkd.html.
  35. 35.
    Franche RL, Frank J, Krause N. Prediction of occupational disability: models, factors and outcomes. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 93–116.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wunderlich GS. The dynamics of disability: measuring and monitoring disability for social security programs. Washington: National Academies Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    US Bureau of the census. Census of population and housing, 1990: guide. Part B: glossary. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 1992.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    US Social Security Administration, Office of Disability. Disability evaluation under social security. Washington: SSA Publication; 1998.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    De Jong PR. Disability and disability insurance. In: Prinz C, editor. European disability pension policies 11 country trends 1970-2002. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2003. p. 77–137.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yelin E, Henke C, Epstein W. The work dynamics of the person with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30(5):507–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(1):5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Turk DC, Monarch ES. Biopsychosocial perspective on chronic pain. In: Gatchel R, Turk DC, editors. Psychological approaches to pain management. New York: Guilford; 1996. p. 3–32.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Friesen MN. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thulesius HO, Grahn BE. Reincentivizing work: a grounded theory of work and sick leave. Grounded Theory Rev. 2007;6(2):47–66.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hussi T. Essays on managing knowledge and work related wellbeing [Doctoral thesis]. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration; 2005.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ilmarinen J. Ageing workers in the European Union: status and promotion of work ability, employability, and employment. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Ministry of Labour; 1999.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J. New dimensions of work ability. Int Congr Ser. 2005;1280:3–7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yelin EH, Katz PP. Labor force participation among persons with musculoskeletal conditions, 1970 1987: national estimates derived from a series of cross sections. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(11):1361–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vuori J, Kivisto S, Ahola K, Kuokkanen S. The role of preventive interventions in promoting health and work ability during work career. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ministry of Labour; 2004.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Benítez-Silva H, Disney R, Jiménez-Martín S. Disability, capacity for work and the business cycle: an international perspective. Econ Policy. 2010;25(63):483–536.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Barlow JH, Wright CC, Williams B, Keat A. Work disability among people with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45(5):424–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Allaire SH. Update on work disability in rheumatic diseases. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001;13(2):93–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Russo NF, Jansen MA. Women, work, and disability: opportunities and challenges. In: Fine M, Asch A, editors. Women with disabilities: essays in psychology, culture, and politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1988. p. 229–44.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Santiago AM, Muschkin CG. Disentangling the effects of disability status and gender on the labor supply of Anglo, Black, and Latino older workers. Gerontologist. 1996;36(3):299–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Burton W, Morrison A, Maclean R, Ruderman E. Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56(1):18–27.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Al Dhanhani AM, Gignac MAM, Su J, Fortin PR. Work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(3):378–85.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Burton JF Jr. Permanent partial disability benefits. In: Roberts K, Burton Jr JF, Bodah MM, editors. Workplace injuries and diseases: prevention and compensation: essays in honor of Terry Thomason. Kalamazoo: Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 2005. p. 69–116.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lacaille D, Sheps S, Spinelli JJ, Chalmers A, Esdaile JM. Identification of modifiable work related factors that influence the risk of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(5):843–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boonen A, Dagnelie PC, Feleus A, Hesselink MA, Muris JW, Stockbrügger RW, et al. The impact of inflammatory bowel disease on labor force participation: results of a population sampled case-control study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8(6):382–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shaw WS, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors? J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):591–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Eisner MD, Yelin EH, Katz PP, Lactao G, Iribarren C, Blanc PD. Risk factors for work disability in severe adult asthma. Am J Med. 2006;119(10):884–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lipton RB, Liberman JN, Kolodner KB, Bigal ME, Dowson A, Stewart WF. Migraine headache disability and health-related quality-of-life: a population based case control study from England. Cephalalgia. 2003;23(6):441–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dellve L, Ahlstrom L, Jonsson A, Sandsjö L, Forsman M, Lindegård A, et al. Myofeedback training and intensive muscular strength training to decrease pain and improve work ability among female workers on long-term sick leave with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(3):335–46.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bombardier C. Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine. 2000;25(24):3100–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pole JD, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Vidmar M, Krause N. Duration of work disability: a comparison of self-report and administrative data. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(5):394–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):453–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ledoux E, Laberge M. Bilan et perspectives de recherche sur la SST des jeunes travailleurs. Rapport IRSST. 2006;R-481.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Anema JR, Cuelenaere B, van der Beek AJ, Knol DL, de Vet HC, van Mechelen W. The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions on return-to-work after low back pain; a prospective two year cohort study in six countries on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(4):289–94.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hogg-Johnson S, Cole DC. Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(4):244–53.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rossignol M. The management of low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(9):617.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Butler R, Johnson W, Baldwin M. Managing work disability: why first return to work is not a measure of success. Indust Labor Relat Rev. 1995;48(3):452–69.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work ability index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Evans RG, Barer ML, Marmor TR. Être ou ne pas être en bonne santé: biologie et déterminants sociaux de la maladie. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal; 1996.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. Sociology and Rehabilitation Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1965. p. 100.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Loisel P, Anema JR, Feuerstein M, Pransky G, MacEachen H, Costa-Black KM. Preface. In: Loisel P, Anema JR, editors. Handbook of work disability: prevention and management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. ix.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Fan ZJ, Foley MP, Rauser E, Bonauto DK, Silverstein BA. Effects of residential location and work-commuting on long-term work disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9424-2.
  79. 79.
    Crook J, Moldofsky H. The probability of recovery and return to work from work disability as a function of time. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(Suppl 1):97–109.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gunasekara FI, Carter K, Blakely T. Comparing self-rated health and self-assessed change in health in a longitudinal survey: which is more valid? Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(7):1117–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bilder S, Mechanic D. Navigating the disability process: persons with mental disorders applying for and receiving disability benefits. Milbank Q. 2003;81(1):75–106.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Parsons T. The social system. Glencoe: The free press; 1951.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Parsons T. The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Health Soc. 1975;53:257–78.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Parsons T. Illness and the role of the physician: a sociological perspective. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1957;2:452–60.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Holmqvist M. Creating the disabled person: a case study of recruitment to “Work-for-the-Disabled” programs. Scand J Disabil Res. 2008;10(3):191–207.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tengland PA. The concept of work ability. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):275–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tuomi K. Eleven-year follow-up of aging workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;23(Suppl 1):1–2.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sampere M, Gimeno D, Serra C, Plana M, López J, Martínez J, et al. Return to work expectations of workers on long-term non-work-related sick leave. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):15–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    McNeil JM. Labor force status and other characteristics of persons with a work disability: 1982. Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1983;127:1–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chirikos TN. Accounting for the historical rise in work-disability prevalence. Milbank Q. 1986;64(2):271–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Greenwald HP, Dirks SJ, Borgatta EF, McCorkle R, Nevitt MC, Yelin EH. Work disability among cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(11):1253–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Yelin E. Displaced concern: the social context of the work-disability problem. Milbank Q. 1989;67(Suppl 2 Pt 1):114–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Levine DB, Singer BH, Zitter M, Ingram L, Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, et al. Disability statistics: an assessment: report of a workshop. Levine DB, Zitter M, Ingram L, editors. Washington: National Academy Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Allaire SH, Meenan RF, Anderson JJ. The impact of rheumatoid arthritis on the household work performance of women. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(6):669–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Eskelinen L, Nygard CH, Huuhtanen P, Klockars M. Background and objectives of the Finnish research project on aging workers in municipal occupations. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17(Suppl 1):7–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    McNeil JM, Franklin PA, Mars LI. Work status, earnings, and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities. In: Thompson-Hoffman S, Stork I, editors. Disability in the United States: a portrait from national data. New York: Springer; 1991. p. 133–60.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Nygård CH, Eskelinen L, Suvanto S, Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J. Associations between functional capacity and work ability among elderly municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17(Suppl 1):122–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Spoonster JR. Vocational expert testimony and malpractice: defining the basics. In: Fry R, editor. Seventh national forum on issues in vocational assessment; March 10–12; Louisville: Stout Vocational Rehabilitation Institute, University of Wisconsin-Stout; 1995. p. 88.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Blanc PD, Cisternas M, Smith S, Yelin EH. Asthma, employment status, and disability among adults treated by pulmonary and allergy specialists. Chest. 1996;109(3):688–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Blanc PD, Faucett J, Kennedy JJ, Cisternas M, Yelin E. Self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: predictors of work disability from the National Health Interview Survey Occupational Health Supplement. Am J Ind Med. 1996;30(3):362–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Straaton KV, Maisiak R, Wrigley JM, White MB, Johnson P, Fine PR. Barriers to return to work among persons unemployed due to arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):101–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wolfe F, Potter J. Fibromyalgia and work disability: is fibromyalgia a disabling disabling disorder? Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1996;22(2):369–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    McDonough PA. The social patterning of work disability among women in Canada. J Disabil Policy Stud. 1997;8(1&2):75–95.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Partridge AJ, Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Lew RA, Wright EA, Fossel AH, et al. Risk factors for early work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(12):2199–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Stronks K, Van de Mheen H, Van Den Bos J, Mackenbach JP. The interrelationship between income, health and employment status. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(3):592–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Blanc PD, Ellbjär S, Janson C, Norbäck D, Norrman E, Plaschke P, et al. Asthma-related work disability in Sweden. The impact of workplace exposures. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(6):2028–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ilmarinen J, Rantanen J. Promotion of work ability during ageing. Am J Ind Med. 1999;36(Suppl 1):21–3.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Jans L, Stoddard S. Chartbook on women and disability in the United States. An infoUse Report. Washington: US National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; 1999.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Löfvander M. Attitudes towards pain and return to work in young immigrants on long term sick leave. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999;17(3):164–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mayfield JA, Deb P, Whitecotton L. Work disability and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(7):1105–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Blanc PD. Characterizing the occupational impact of asthma. In: Weiss K, Buist A, Sullivan S, editors. Asthma’s impact on society: the social and economic burden. Hoboken: Informa Healthcare; 2000. p. 55–75.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Guillemin F. Functional disability and quality-of-life assessment in clinical practice. Rheumatology. 2000;39(Suppl 1):17–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wang PS, Berglund P, Kessler RC. Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States: prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(5):284–92.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Boonen A, Chorus A, Miedema H, van Der Heijde D, van Der Tempel H, Van der Linden SJ. Employment, work disability, and work days lost in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross sectional study of Dutch patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(4):353–8.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Boonen A, Chorus A, Miedema H, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Schouten H, et al. Withdrawal from labour force due to work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60(11):1033–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Fredriksen-Goldsen KI, Scharlach AE. Families and work: new directions in the twenty-first century. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lund T. Associations between health and work disability [Doctoral thesis]. Copenhagen: National Institute of Occupational Health; 2001.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    MacDonald-Wilson K, Rogers ES, Anthony WA. Unique issues in assessing work function among individuals with psychiatric disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(3):217–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Pohjonen T. Perceived work ability of home care workers in relation to individual and work related factors in different age groups. Occup Med (Lond). 2001;51(3):209–17.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Boonen A, van Der Heijde D, Landewé R, Spoorenberg A, Schouten H, Rutten-van Mölken M, et al. Work status and productivity costs due to ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of three European countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61(5):429–37.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Shaw L, Polatajko H. An application of the occupation competence model to organizing factors associated with return to work. Can J Occup Ther. 2002;69(3):158–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    de Walque D. Long-term disability insurance in the Netherlands: a problem of hidden unemployment? Cuadernos Econ. 2003;40(121):485–94.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Berglund P, Eaton WW, Koretz DS, Walters EE. Mild disorders should not be eliminated from the DSM-V. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(11):1117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Lund T, Csonka A. Risk factors in health, work environment, smoking status, and organizational context for work disability. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44(5):492–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Vandenplas O, Torén K, Blanc P. Health and socioeconomic impact of work-related asthma. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(4):689–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Allaire SH. What work changes do people with arthritis make to preserve employment, and are such changes effective? Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(6):871–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Crimmins EM, Hayward MD. Workplace characteristics and work disability onset for men and women. Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(2):122–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Frings-Dresen MH. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77(8):527–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Möttönen T, Hannonen P, Korpela M, Julkunen H, et al. Impact of initial aggressive drug treatment with a combination of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on the development of work disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: a five year randomized followup trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(1):55–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Robinson JP, Fulton-Kehoe D, Franklin GM, Wu R. Multidisciplinary pain center outcomes in Washington State workers’ compensation. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46(5):473–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Visscher TL, Rissanen A, Seidell JC, Heliovaara M, Knekt P, Reunanen A, et al. Obesity and unhealthy life-years in adult Finns: an empirical approach. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13):1413–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Allaire S, Wolfe F, Niu J, Lavalley M, Michaud K. Work disability and its economic effect on 55–64 year old adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(4):603–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Malek NA, Veinot P, Perruccio A, MacKay C, Power D, Badley EM. Arthritis in women: a challenge for health care in Ontario. Toronto: Arthritis Community Research & Evaluation Unit; 2005.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Merkesdal S, Ruof J, Huelsemann JL, Mittendorf T, Handelmann S, Mau W, et al. Indirect cost assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA): comparison of data from the health economic patient questionnaire HEQ RA and insurance claims data. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(2):234–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Wolfe F, Michaud K, Strand V. Expanding the definition of clinical differences: from minimally clinically important differences to really important differences. Analyses in 8931 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(4):583–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Chung CP, Sokka T, Arbogast PG, Pincus T. Work disability in early rheumatoid arthritis: higher rates but better clinical status in Finland compared with the US. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(12):1653–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Franche RL, Pole JD, Hogg Johnson S, Vidmar M, Breslin C. The impact of work related musculoskeletal disorders on workers’ caregiving activities. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(9):780–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Kremer AM, Pal TM, van Keimpema AR. Employment and disability for work in patients with COPD: a cross-sectional study among Dutch patients. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;80(1):78–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Lindberg P. The work ability continuum: epidemiological studies of factors promoting sustainable work ability [Doctoral thesis]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2006.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Lindberg P, Vingård E, Josephson M, Alfredsson L. Retaining the ability to work-associated factors at work. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16(5):470–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Steenstra I, Verbeek J, Prinsze F, Knol D. Changes in the incidence of occupational disability as a result of back and neck pain in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):190–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Tseng CL, Sambamoorthi U, Tiwari A, Rajan M, Findley P, Pogach L. Diabetes care among veteran women with disability. Women’s Health Issues. 2006;16(6):361–71.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Bertoli AM, Fernández M, Alarcón GS, Vilá LM, Reveille JD. Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort LUMINA (XLI): factors predictive of self-reported work disability. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(1):12–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Committee on Veterans’ Compensation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. PTSD compensation and military service. Washington: National Academies Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  145. 145.
    Eberhardt K, Larsson BM, Nived K, Lindqvist E. Work disability in rheumatoid arthritis–development over 15 years and evaluation of predictive factors over time. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(3):481–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Fonseca JE, Cavaleiro J, Teles J, Sousa E, Andreozzi VL, Antunes M, et al. Contribution for new genetic markers of rheumatoid arthritis activity and severity: sequencing of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene promoter. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(2):R37.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Karlsson N. Prospective cohort studies of disability pension and mortality in a Swedish county [Doctoral thesis]. Stokholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2007.Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Allaire S, Wolfe F, Niu J, Zhang Y, Zhang B, LaValley M. Evaluation of the effect of anti-tumor necrosis factor agent use on rheumatoid arthritis work disability: the jury is still out. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(8):1082–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A, Husman P. Work health promotion, job well-being, and sickness absences-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(11):1216–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Mok CC, Cheung MY, Ho LY, Yu KL, To CH. Risk and predictors of work disability in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2008;17(12):1103–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Nordenfelt L. The concept of work ability. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang; 2008.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Plug I, Peters M, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, de Goede-Bolder A, Heijnen L, Smit C, et al. Social participation of patients with hemophilia in the Netherlands. Blood. 2008;111(4):1811–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Utset TO, Chohan S, Booth SA, Laughlin JC, Kocherginsky M, Schmitz A. Correlates of formal work disability in an urban university systemic lupus erythematosus practice. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(6):1046–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Welti F. Work activation and rehabilitation of disabled people in Germany in the framework of European strategies—problems of coherence and policy mismatch. In: Stendahl S, Erhag T, Devetzi S, editors. A European work-first welfare state. Göteborg: Centre for European Research; 2008. p. 145–56.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    Zirkzee EJ, Sneep AC, de Buck PD, Allaart CF, Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, et al. Sick leave and work disability in patients with early arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(1):11–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Detaille SI, Heerkens YF, Engels JA, Van Der Gulden JWJ, Van Dijk FJH. Common prognostic factors of work disability among employees with a chronic somatic disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(4):261–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Hudson M, Steele R, Lu Y, Thombs BD, Canadian Scleroderma Research Group, Baron M. Work disability in systemic sclerosis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(11):2481–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Munir F, Yarker J, McDermott H. Employment and the common cancers: correlates of work ability during or following cancer treatment. Occup Med (Lond). 2009;59(6):381–9.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    Toren K, Zock J, Kogevinas M, Plana E, Sunyer J, Radon K, et al. An international prospective general population-based study of respiratory work disability. Thorax. 2009;64(4):339–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Tunceli K, Zeng H, Habib ZA, Williams L. Long-term projections for diabetes-related work loss and limitations among US adults. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;83(1):e23–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Warren N, Meijster T, Heederik D, Tielemans E. A dynamic population-based model for the development of work-related respiratory health effects among bakery workers. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(12):810–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Cerghet M, Dobie E, Lafata JE, Schultz L, Elias S, Pladevall M, et al. Adherence to disease-modifying agents and association with quality of life among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2010;12:51–8.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Claessen H, Brenner H, Drath C, Arndt V. Serum uric acid and risk of occupational disability: findings from a cohort study of male construction workers in Germany. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(9):1278–86.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Franche R, Murray E, Ostry A, Ratner P, Wagner S, Harder H. Work disability prevention in rural healthcare workers. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10(4):1502–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Karlsson N, Skargren E, Kristenson M. Emotional support predicts more sickness absence and poorer self assessed work ability: a two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):648–59.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Kristman V, Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Van Eerd D, Vidmar M, et al. The burden of work disability associated with mild traumatic brain injury in Ontario compensated workers: a prospective cohort study. Open Occup Health Saf J. 2010;2:1–8.Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Malo JL, Lemière C, Gautrin D, Labrecque M, Lavoie K. Asthma and the workplace. In: Harver A, Kotses H, editors. Asthma, health and society: a public health perspective. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 303–23.Google Scholar
  168. 168.
    Salo P, Oksanen T, Sivertsen B, Hall M, Pentti J, Virtanen M, et al. Sleep disturbances as a predictor of cause-specific work disability and delayed return to work. Sleep. 2010;33(10):1323–31.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Groothoff JW. Sources of variation in work disability assessment. Work. 2010;37(4):405–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Swan PAL. Retaining older workers in local government: predictors influencing their retirement intentions [Doctoral thesis]. Syndey: University of Wollongong; 2010.Google Scholar
  171. 171.
    Warner DF, Hayward MD, Hardy MA. The retirement life course in America at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2010;29(6):893–919.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Gudbergsson SB, Torp S, Fløtten T, Fosså SD, Nielsen R, Dahl AA. A comparative study of cancer patients with short and long sick-leave after primary treatment. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(3):381–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Guidotti TL, editor. Global occupational health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Jurado D, Gurpegui M. Factors associated with work, social life and family life disability in bipolar disorder patients. Psychiatry Res. 2011;186(2–3):254–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Macnicol J. The history of work-disability. Social policy association conference. July 4–6. Lincoln: University of Lincoln; 2011.Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Neovius M, Simard JF, Klareskog L, Askling J. ARTIS Study Group. Sick leave and disability pension before and after initiation of antirheumatic therapies in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(8):1407–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Virtanen M, Kawachi I, Oksanen T, Salo P, Tuisku K, Pulkki-Råback L, et al. Socio-economic differences in long-term psychiatric work disability: prospective cohort study of onset, recovery and recurrence. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(11):791–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valérie Lederer
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Patrick Loisel
    • 2
  • Michèle Rivard
    • 1
  • François Champagne
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Montreal Public Health Research InstituteMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Social and Preventive MedicineUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations