Pain-Related Work Interference is a Key Factor in a Worker/Workplace Model of Work Absence Duration Due to Musculoskeletal Conditions in Canadian Nurses
- 628 Downloads
Objective To examine the role of pain experiences in relation to work absence, within the context of other worker health factors and workplace factors among Canadian nurses with work-related musculoskeletal (MSK) injury. Methods Structural equation modeling was used on a sample of 941 employed, female, direct care nurses with at least one day of work absence due to a work-related MSK injury, from the cross-sectional 2005 National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses. Results The final model suggests that pain severity and pain-related work interference mediate the impact of the following worker health and workplace factors on work absence duration: depression, back problems, age, unionization, workplace physical demands and low job control. The model accounted for 14 % of the variance in work absence duration and 46.6 % of the variance in pain-related work interference. Conclusions Our findings support a key role for pain severity and pain-related work interference in mediating the effects of workplace factors and worker health factors on work absence duration. Future interventions should explore reducing pain-related work interference through addressing workplace issues, such as providing modified work, reducing physical demands, and increasing job control.
KeywordsWork absence Musculoskeletal injuries Pain Multimorbidity Healthcare workers Depression
This project was funded by a research grant provided by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (Ontario). While the research and analysis are based on data from Statistics Canada, the opinions expressed do not represent the views of Statistics Canada. Peter Smith is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Nancy Carnide is supported by a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
- 1.NIOSH. State of the Sector|Healthcare and Social Assistance. Identification of research opportunities for the next decade of NORA: Department of Health and Human Services (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health [NIOSH]) 2009. Report No.: Report No.: 2009-139.Google Scholar
- 2.Frank J, Cullen K; the IWH Ad Hoc Working Group. Preventing injury, illness and disability at work: a view from Canada. A discussion paper for the occupational health and safety community. Scan J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(2):160–7.Google Scholar
- 10.World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. 2001. www.who.int/icidh.2001.
- 17.Franche RL, Carnide N, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Breslin FC, Bültmann U, et al. Course, diagnosis, and treatment of depressive symptomatology in workers following a workplace injury: a prospective cohort study. Can J Psych. 2009;54(8):534–46.Google Scholar
- 24.Shields M, Wilkins K, Statistics C, Health C, Canadian Institute for Health I. Findings from the 2005 National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses. Ottawa: Statistic Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
- 27.Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy D, Carroll L, Frank JW. The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim closure after whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:275–86.Google Scholar
- 29.Ash P, Goldstein SI. Predictors of returning to work. Bull Am Acad Psychiatr Law. 1995;23(2):205–10.Google Scholar
- 30.Shields M, Wilkins K. Technical Appendix. Findings from the 2005 National Survey of the Work and Health of Nurses. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
- 32.Labour Statistics Division. Work Absence Rates, 2009. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2010.Google Scholar
- 33.Labour Statistics Division. Work Absence Rates, 2008. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2009.Google Scholar
- 36.Siegrist J, Klein D, Voigt KH. Linking sociological with physiological data: the model of effort-reward imbalance at work. [Review] [14 refs]. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 1997; 640(Supplementum):112–6.Google Scholar
- 37.Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3(4):322–55.Google Scholar
- 41.Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2004.Google Scholar
- 42.Morneau Sobecco. Recommendations for experience rating: For discussion with stakeholders: Morneau Sobeco, 2008.Google Scholar