Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 419–427 | Cite as

Quantification of the Safe Maximal Lift in Functional Capacity Evaluations: Comparison of Muscle Recruitment Using SEMG and Therapist Observation

  • Carole JamesEmail author
  • Lynette Mackenzie
  • Mike Capra


Introduction This study aimed to identify any correlation between muscle activity using surface electromyography (SEMG) and therapist determined safe maximal lift (SML) during the bench to shoulder lift of the WorkHab FCE. This would support construct (convergent) validity of SML determination in the WorkHab FCE. Method An experimental laboratory based study design was used. Twenty healthy volunteers performed the bench to shoulder lift of the WorkHab FCE whilst SEMG of upper trapezius, mid deltoid, thoracic, brachioradialis and bicep muscles were recorded. A summary of the data is presented using descriptive statistics and differences between groups were tested using generalised linear mixed models. Results Results showed a significant difference in activity and duration of muscle activation with increasing weight lifted [p = 0.000 and p = 0.024 (brachioradialis)]. There was a significant difference between the up lift (bench to shoulder) and the down lift (shoulder to bench) for all muscles (p = 0.000) except the brachioradialis (p = 0.819). No significant change was found in muscle activity before or after the SML. Conclusion Convergent validity of the bench to shoulder lift of the WorkHab FCE was not established as no relationship between the muscle recruitment using SEMG and SML, as determined by therapist observation was identified during this lift.


Electromyography Lifting Work capacity evaluation WorkHab FCE 



The authors would like to thank the individuals who volunteered to participate in this study and WorkHab Australia who donated the equipment to complete the study. This study was made possible with the support of a University of Newcastle Equity Fellowship grant (No.: GO189367).


  1. 1.
    Soer R, van der Schans C, Groothoff J, Geertzen J, Reneman M. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a delphi survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):389–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    King P, Tuckwell N, Barrett T. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78(8):852.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Sluiter J, Frings-Dresen M. Reliability and agreement of 5 Ergo-kit functional capacity evaluation lifting tests in subjects with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(10):1365–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gross D, Battie M, Asante A. Evaluation of a short form functional capacity evaluation: less maybe best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):422–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee G, Chan C, Hui-Chan C. Work profile and functional capacity of formwork carpenters at construction sites. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(1):9–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schonstein E, Kenny D. The value of functional and work place assessments in achieving a timely return to work for workers with back pain. Work. 2001;16(1):31–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strong S, Baptiste S, Clarke J, Costa M. Use of functional capacity evaluations in workplaces and the compensation system: a report on workers’ and users’ perceptions. Work. 2004;23(1):67–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Innes E. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluations: an update. Int J Disab Manag Res. 2006;1(1):135–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cotton A, Schonstein E, Adams R. Use of functional capacity evaluations by rehabilitation providers in NSW. Work. 2006;26(3):287–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deen M, Gibson L, Strong J. A survey of occupational therapy in Australian work practice. Work. 2002;19(3):219–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Innes E, Straker L. Workplace assessments and functional capacity evaluations: current practices of therapists in Australia. Work. 2002;18(1):51–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isernhagen S. Functional capacity testing:what’s new? what’s different. Interdiscip J Rehabil. 2009; June: 20–3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    James C, Mackenzie L. Health professional’s perceptions and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations: results of a quantitative survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(2):203–11. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9174-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    James C, Mackenzie L. The clinical utility of functional capacity evaluations: the opinion of health professionals working within occupational rehabilitation. Work. 2009;33(3):231–9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholz JP, Millford JP, McMillan AG. Neuromuscular coordination of squat lifting, I: effect of load magnitude. Phys Ther. 1995;75(2):119–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elfeituri FE. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2001;7(3):333–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Burr D, Davis KG, Gupta P. Functional impairment as a predictor of spine loading. Spine. 2005;30(7):729–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scholz JP, McMillan AG. Neuromuscular coordination of squat lifting, II: individual differences. Phys Ther. 1995;75(2):133–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manning DP, Shannon HS. Slipping accidents causing low-back pain in a gearbox factory. Spine. 1981;6(1):70–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wrigley AT, Albert WJ, Deluzio KJ, Stevenson JM. Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not. Clin Biomech. 2005;20(3):254–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abdel-Moty E, Fishbain D, Khalil T, Sadek S, Cutler R, Steele-Rosomoff R, et al. Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clin J Pain. 1993;9(3):168–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gibson L, Strong J. A review of functional capacity evaluation practice. Work. 1997;9(1):3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell T. Utilization of the functional capacity evaluation in vocational rehabilitation. J Vocat Rehabil. 2008;28(1):21–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Isernhagen S. Functional capacity evaluation:rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehabil. 1992;2(3):157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    James C, Mackenzie L, Higginbotham N. Health professionals’ attitudes and practices in relation to functional capacity evaluations. Work. 2007;29(2):81–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bradbury S, Roberts D. Workhab functional capacity evaluation procedural manual WorkHab Australia; 1998.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cram J, Kasman G, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Maryland: Aspen; 1998.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R, Papalia S. The effect of upper extremity support on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during keyboard use. Appl Ergon. 2004;35(3):285–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansson G, Nordander C, Asterland P, Ohlsson K, Strömberg U, Skerfving S, et al. Sensitivity of trapezius electromyography to differences between work tasks—influence of gap definition and normalisation methods. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000;10(2):103–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laursen B, Søgaard K, Sjøgaard G. Biomechanical model predicting electromyographic activity in three shoulder muscles from 3D kinematics and external forces during cleaning work. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(4):287–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davis KG, Jorgensen MJ, Marras WS. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift. Ergonomics. 2000;43(2):143–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Granström B, Kvarnström S, Tiefenbacher F. Electromyography as an aid in the prevention of excessive shoulder strain. Appl Ergon. 1985;16(1):49–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jensen C, Finsen L, Hansen K, Christensen H. Upper trapezius muscle activity patterns during repetitive manual material handling and work with a computer mouse. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(5):317–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer P, Frings-Dresen M. Reliability and validity of functional capacity evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004;77(8):527–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gross D, Battie M. The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 2: sustained recovery. Spine. 2004;29(8):920–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Innes E, Straker L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work. 1999;13(2):107–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Innes E, Straker L. Validity of work-related assessments. Work. 1999;13(2):125–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holtgrefe K, Glenn T. Principles of aerobic exercise. In: Kisner C, Colby L, editors. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 2007. p. 231–49.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gibson L, Strong J. Expert review of an approach to functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;19(3):231–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    StataCorp. Stata statistical software: version 11.1. College Station, TX. 11.1 ed 2009.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cole M, Grimshaw P, Burden A. Loads on the lumbar spine during a work capacity assessment test. Work. 2004;23(2):169–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McBride JM, Larkin TR, Dayne AM, Haines TL, Kirby TJ. Effect of absolute and relative loading on muscle activity during stable and unstable squatting. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(2):177–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robertson DG, Wilson JM, St Pierre TA. Lower extremity muscle functions during full squats. J Appl Biomech. 2008;24(4):333–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cifrek M, Medved V, Tonkovic S, Ostojic S. Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(4):327–40.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bosch T, de Looze MP, Kingma I, Visser B, van Dieën JH. Electromyographical manifestations of muscle fatigue during different levels of simulated light manual assembly work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(4):e246–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Huysmans MA, Hoozemans MJM, van der Beek AJ, de Looze MP, van Dieën JH. Fatigue effects on tracking performance and muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(3):410–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roy SH, Bonato P, Knaflitz M. EMG assessment of back muscle function during cyclical lifting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(4):233–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting. Spine. 2005;30(23):2637–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nielsen PK, Andersen L, Jørgensen K. The muscular load on the lower back and shoulders due to lifting at different lifting heights and frequencies. Appl Ergon. 1998;29(6):445–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marras WS, Granata KP, Davis KG, Allread WG, Jorgensen MJ. Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting. Ergonomics. 1999;42(7):980–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Fuller JR, Lomond KV, Fung J, Côté JN. Posture-movement changes following repetitive motion-induced shoulder muscle fatigue. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(6):1043–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gatchel RJ, Ricard MD, Choksi DN, Mayank J, Howard K. The comprehensive muscular activity profile (CMAP): its high sensitivity, specificity and overall classification rate for detecting submaximal effort on functional capacity testing. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lemstra M, Olszynski W, Enright W. The sensitivity and specificity of functional capacity evaluations in determining maximal effort: a randomized trial. Spine. 2004;29(9):953–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Snook SH, Ciriello VM. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics. 1991;34(9):1197–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Konz S. NIOSH lifting guidelines. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1982;43(12):931–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kuijer W, Dijkstra P, Brouwer S, Reneman M, Groothoff J, Geertzen J. Safe lifting in patients with chronic low back pain: comparing FCE lifting task and Niosh lifting guideline. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):579–89. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-9010-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Gross D, Battie M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther. 2002;82(4):364–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gardener L, McKenna K. Reliability of occupational therapists in determining safe, maximal lifting capacity. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46(3):110–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1630.1999.00184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gibson L, Strong J. Safety issues in functional capacity evalutaion: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):237–51. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-1222-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LM. Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation. Work. 1999;12(2):145–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Reneman M, Jaegar S, Westmaas M, Goeken L. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. Work. 2002;18(1):23–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    James C, Mackenzie L, Capra M. Test–retest reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(22):1863–9. doi: 10.3109/09638281003734466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Matheson LN, Leggett S, Mooney V, Schneider K, Mayer J. The contribution of aerobic fitness and back strength to lift capacity. Spine. 2002;27(11):1208–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Schenk P, Klipstein A, Spillmann S, Stroyer J, Laubli T. The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96(2):146–56. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1262-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Soderberg GL, Knutson LM. A guide for use and interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. Phys Ther. 2000;80(5):485–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health SciencesUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations