Vocational Rehabilitation Evaluation and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF)
- 738 Downloads
Purpose To identify the most frequent functional limitations according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) obtained by unstandardised clinical assessment of patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders who underwent vocational rehabilitation evaluation; and to compare the obtained list with simplified versions of ICF. Methods The descriptions of functional limitations were retrospectively identified for 32 patients. The original vocational rehabilitation evaluation was conducted by a multi-professional team in an out-patient clinic of a university hospital. The obtained descriptions were converted to ICF codes, the most frequent being compared with the ICF Checklist of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the ICF Comprehensive and Brief Core Sets suggested by the ICF Research Branch. Results In the study population (53 % women), 141 ICF codes were identified with a preciseness of three or more digits, the average being 21 codes/subject (median 20.0, range 9–40). When truncated to three digits, 84 ICF codes remained (average 18 codes/subject, range 9–25), 45 of which appeared in over 10 % of the study population, 24 also being found in the ICF Comprehensive, 5 in the ICF Brief Core Sets, and 33 in the WHO ICF Checklist. Conclusions The list of most frequent ICF codes retrospectively obtained in this study from unstandardised records showed a similarity with ICF Comprehensive and Brief Core Sets by ICF Research Branch and the ICF Checklist by WHO, but with a bias towards the identification of body structures and functions. The results support the use of ICF in vocational rehabilitation evaluation to ensure comprehensiveness of evaluation. The ICF Comprehensive Core Set seems to be the most useful for the needs of multiprofessional team when assessing functioning of patients.
KeywordsOccupational rehabilitation Rehabilitation assessment Work ability Work capacity
Conflict of interest
- 3.OECD. Transforming disability into ability: policies to promote work and income security for disabled people. Paris: OECD Publication Service; 2003.Google Scholar
- 5.ICF Research Branch in cooperation with the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI) [Internet]. [Updated 2012, cited 2012 July 30] Available from: ICF Research Branch homepage. http://www.icf-research-branch.org/.
- 6.World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2012 [cited 2012 July 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
- 7.World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneve: World Health Organisation; 2008.Google Scholar
- 9.Barnes C, Mercer G. Competing models and approaches. Exploring disability. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010. p. 14–42.Google Scholar
- 10.Oliver M, Barnes C. The importance of definitions in the disability debate. The new politics of disablement. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 11–31.Google Scholar
- 14.Helander E. A critical review of the “International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)”. Conference; Bucharest, Romania. 2003[Internet]. [cited 2012 July 2012]. Available from: http://www.einarhelander.com/critical-review-ICF.pdf.
- 15.World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health: short version: ICF (Who). Geneve: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
- 16.World Health Organization (WHO). ICF Checklist, version 2.1a, clinician form for international classification of functioning, disability and health. 2003 [Internet]. [cited 2012 July 2012]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfchecklist.pdf.