Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 582–590

The Role of Health Care Providers in Long Term and Complicated Workers’ Compensation Claims

  • Agnieszka Kosny
  • Ellen MacEachen
  • Sue Ferrier
  • Lori Chambers
Article

Abstract

Introduction: Health care providers (HCPs) play a central role in workers’ compensation systems. In most systems, they are involved in the legitimization of work-related injury, are required to provide information to workers’ compensation boards about the nature and extent of the injury, give recommendations about return-to-work capability and provide treatment for injury or illness. This study identifies problems that occur at the interface between the health care system, injured workers, and workers’ compensation boards (WCBs) that may complicate and extend workers’ compensation claims and the mechanisms that underlie the development of these problems. Methods: Interviews were sought with injured workers, peer helpers and service providers from a variety of geographic locations in order to get a broad picture of return to work problems and concerns. This analysis includes data from total of 34 interviews with injured workers who had long term and complicated claims. Interviews were also conducted with 14 peer helpers and 21 service providers. Results: We identified four domains related to injured workers’ interface with the health care system that played a key role in complicating and prolonging compensation claims. These problems, related to health care access, conflicting or imperfect medical knowledge, limited understanding of compensation system requirements and confusion about decision-making authority, resulted in frustration, financial difficulties and mental health problems for injured workers. Conclusion: Recommendations are made about how compensation system parties can find better ways to serve injured worker health care needs and facilitate a smooth relationship between the compensation board and HCPs.

Keywords

Health care provider Workers’ compensation Long-term claims Injured workers Qualitative 

References

  1. 1.
    Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. Healthcare practitioners: working with the WSIB [cited 2010 Sept 10]. Available from: http://www.wsib.on.ca/wsib/wsibsite.nsf/public/HealthReporting. 2007.
  2. 2.
    Beardwood B, Kirsh B, Clark N. Victims twice over: perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):30–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return-to-work recommendation, and duration of disability after a workers’ compensation low back injury. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(6):515–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deyo RA. The role of the primary care physician in reducing work absenteeism and costs due to back pain. Occup Med State Art Rev. 1988;3(1):17–30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kosny A, Franche RL, Pole J, Krause N, Cote P, Mustard C. Early healthcare provider communication with patients and their workplace following a lost-time claim for an occupational musculoskeletal injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):27–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nordin M, Cedraschi C, Skovron ML. Patient-health care provider relationship in patients with non-specific low back pain: a review of some problem situations. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12(1):75–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laerum E, Indahl A, Sture SJ. What is “the good back-consultation”? A combined qualitative and quantitative study of chronic low back pain patients’ interaction with and perceptions of consultations with specialists. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(4):255–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reynolds CA, Wagner SL, Harder HG. Physician-stakeholder collaboration in disability management: a Canadian perspective on guidelines and expectations. Disab Rehabil. 2006;28(15):955–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell G, Brown JB, Stewart M. Managing injured workers: family physicians’ experiences. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:78–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schweigert MK, McNeil D, Doupe L. Treating physicians’s perceptions of barriers to return to work of their patients in southern Ontario. Occup Med. 2004;54(6):425–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lax MB. Occupational medicine: toward a worker/patient empowerment approach to occupational illness. Int J Health Sci. 2002;32(3):515–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lippel K, Lefebvre MC, Schmidt C, Caron J. Managing Claims or caring for claimants: effects on the compensation process on the health of injured workers. UQAM Service aux collectivites: Universite du Quebec a Montreal; 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work. 2007;29(2):155–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S, Chambers L. The “toxic dose” of system problems: why some injured workers don’t return to work as expected. J Occup Rehab. 2010;20(3):349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ontario Medical Association. OMA position paper. The role of the primary care physician in timely return to work. Ont Med Rev. 2009;76(3):23–38.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer RS. The physician’s role in workers’ compensation. J Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil. 1998;10:81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mootz RD, Franklin GM, Stoner WH. Strategies for preventing chronic disability in injured workers. Top Clin Chiropr. 1999;6(2):13–25.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pransky G, Katz JN, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J. Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners. Disab Rehabil. 2002;24(16):867–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Talmage JB. Failure to communicate: how terminology and forms confuse the work ability/disability evaluation process. J Insur Med. 2007;39(3):192–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lotters F, Franche RL, Hogg-Johnson S, Burdorf A, Pole JD. The prognostic value of depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, and self-efficacy for duration of lost-time benefits in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(12):794–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Friedman PJ. Predictors of work disability in work-related upper-extremity disorders. JOEM. 1997;39(4):339–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Theodossiou I. Effects of low-pay and unemployment on psychological well-being: a logistic regression approach. J Health Econ. 1998;17:85–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kosny A, Franche RL, Pole J, Krause N, Cote P, Mustard C. Early healthcare provider communication with patients and their workplace following a lost-time claim for an occupational musculoskeletal injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):27–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agnieszka Kosny
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ellen MacEachen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sue Ferrier
    • 1
  • Lori Chambers
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Work and HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.The Ontario HIV Treatment NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations