Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 455–473 | Cite as

Factors Associated with Functional Capacity Test Results in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

  • Renske van AbbemaEmail author
  • Sandra E. Lakke
  • Michiel F. Reneman
  • Cees P. van der Schans
  • Corrien J. M. van Haastert
  • Jan H. B. Geertzen
  • Harriët Wittink
Article

Abstract

Introduction: Functional capacity tests are standardized instruments to evaluate patients’ capacities to execute work-related activities. Functional capacity test results are associated with biopsychosocial factors, making it unclear what is being measured in capacity testing. An overview of these factors was missing. The objective of this review was to investigate the level of evidence for factors that are associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed identifying relevant studies from an electronic journal databases search. Candidate studies employed a cross-sectional or RCT design and were published between 1980 and October 2010. The quality of these studies was determined and level of evidence was reported for factors that were associated with capacity results in at least 3 studies. Results: Twenty-two studies were included. The level of evidence was reported for lifting low, lifting high, carrying, and static lifting capacity. Lifting low test results were associated with self-reported disability and specific self-efficacy but not with pain duration. There was conflicting evidence for associations of lifting low with pain intensity, fear of movement/(re)injury, depression, gender and age. Lifting high was associated with gender and specific self-efficacy, but not with pain intensity or age. There is conflicting evidence for the association of lifting high with the factors self-reported disability, pain duration and depression. Carrying was associated with self-reported disability and not with pain intensity and there is conflicting evidence for associations with specific self-efficacy, gender and age. Static lifting was associated with fear of movement/(re)injury. Conclusions: Much heterogeneity was observed in investigated capacity tests and candidate associated factors. There was some evidence for biological and psychological factors that are or are not associated with capacity results but there is also much conflicting evidence. High level evidence for social factors was absent.

Keywords

Review Non-specific chronic low back pain Functional capacity 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. ICF: International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rudy TE, Lieber SJ, Boston JR, Gourley LM, Baysal E. Psychosocial predictors of physical performance in disabled individuals with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:18–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geisser ME, Robinson ME, Miller QL, Bade SM. Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:259–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:389–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gross DP, Battie MC. Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers’ compensation claimants with low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005;85:315–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alschuler KN, Theisen-Goodvich ME, Haig AJ, Geisser ME. A comparison of the relationship between depression, perceived disability, and physical performance in persons with chronic pain. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:757–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smeets RJ, van Geel AC, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Physical capacity tasks in chronic low back pain: what is the contributing role of cardiovascular capacity, pain and psychological factors? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:577–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reneman MF, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Kleen M, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Are pain intensity and pain related fear related to functional capacity evaluation performances of patients with chronic low back pain? J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:247–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asante AK, Brintnell ES, Gross DP. Functional self-efficacy beliefs influence functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:73–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reneman MF, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S. General and specific self-efficacy reports of patients with chronic low back pain: are they related to performances in a functional capacity evaluation? J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:183–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vom Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    von Elm E, Egger M. The scandal of poor epidemiological research. BMJ. 2004;329:868–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:666–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Elm E. Commentary: assessing the quality of observational studies-or a lesson from Mars. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:677–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, The editorial board of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28(12):1290–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munro BH, Visintainer MA, Batten Page E. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippencott; 1986.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, Lysens R. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: Evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80:329–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teixeira da Cunha-Filho I, Lima FC, Guimaraes FR, Leite HR. Use of physical performance tests in a group of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking individuals with low back pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Filho IT, Simmonds MJ, Protas EJ, Jones S. Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: what are the relationships among methods and measures? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:913–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cutler RB, Fishbain DA, Steele-Rosomoff R, Rosomoff HL. Relationships between functional capacity measures and baseline psychological measures in chronic pain patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:249–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Geisser ME, Haig AJ, Theisen ME. Activity avoidance and function in persons with chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2000;10:215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuijer W, Brouwer S, Preuper HR, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Work status and chronic low back pain: exploring the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:379–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lackner JM, Carosella AM, Feuerstein M. Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64:212–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Dijkstra SJ, Dijkstra PU. Relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:277–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reneman MF, Kool J, Oesch P, Geertzen JH, Battie MC, Gross DP. Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1143–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Boonstra AM, Dijkstra PU, Versteegen GJ, Geertzen JH, Brouwer S. Relationship between psychological factors and performance-based and self-reported disability in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1448–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van EH. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62:363–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wittink H, Rogers W, Gascon C, Sukiennik A, Cynn D, Carr DB. Relative contribution of mental health and exercise-related pain increment to treadmill test intolerance in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2001;26:2368–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lackner JM, Carosella AM. The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1999;24:2254–60. discussion 60–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:119–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:287–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vlaeyen JW, Crombez G. Fear of movement/(re)injury, avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 1999;4:187–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soer R, Poels BJJ, Geertzen JHB, Reneman MF. A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:639–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gross DP, Bhambhani Y, Haykowsky MJ, Rashiq S. Acute opioid administration improves work-related exercise performance in patients with chorinic back pain. J Pain. 2008;9:856–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renske van Abbema
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sandra E. Lakke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michiel F. Reneman
    • 2
  • Cees P. van der Schans
    • 1
    • 2
  • Corrien J. M. van Haastert
    • 4
  • Jan H. B. Geertzen
    • 2
  • Harriët Wittink
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Applied Research and Innovation in Health Care and in NursingHanze University, University of Applied SciencesGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for RehabilitationUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Research Group Lifestyle and HealthUniversity of Applied SciencesUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Policy development and innovationDutch Patient Consumer Federation (NPCF)UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations