Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference
- 472 Downloads
Introduction A mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative), multicenter study was conducted using a focus group design to explore the lived experiences of persons in vocational rehabilitation (VR) with regard to functioning and contextual factors using six open-ended questions related to the ICF components. The results were classified by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a frame of reference. Methods The meaningful concepts within the transcribed data were identified and linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Results The seven focus groups with 26 participants yielded a total of 4,813 relevant concepts which were linked to a total of 160 different second-level ICF categories. From the client perspective, the ICF components (a) body functions, (b) activities and participation and (c) environmental factors were equally represented, while (d) body structures appeared less frequently. Out of the total number of concepts, 864 concepts (18%) were assigned to the ICF component personal factors which is not yet classified but could indicate important aspects of resource management and strategy development of patients in VR. Conclusion Therefore, VR of patients must not be limited to anatomical and pathophysiologic changes, but should also consider a more comprehensive view which includes client’s demands, strategies and resources in daily life and the context around the individual and social circumstances of their work situation.
KeywordsICF Vocational rehabilitation Qualitative study Client perspective Focus groups
The authors would like to express their special thanks to the health professionals who were involved in the study center organization and data collection. In Bellikon, Switzerland: Dr. Hans-Peter Gmünder, Dr. Peter Erhart, Jacqueline Huber, Markus Roth, and Beatrice Jansen. In Zurich, Switzerland: Dr. Andreas Klipstein, Edith Gitermann. In Kirchseeon, Germany: Jochen Kunert, Dr. Maria Schrör, Axel Kunz and Andrea Pfingsten. We want to thank all client/patient participants for their support and contribution to the discussion. From the ICF Research Branch and Swiss Paraplegic Research team, would like to thank Dr. Teresa Brinkel for being involved in the peer review, Katharina Strasky for her help in the transcription of the recordings of the focus groups, Anne Brust for assisting the focus groups, Miriam Lückenkemper for proof reading the manuscript, and Cristina Bostan, who is supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship from the EU funded project MURINET. This project was funded by the Swiss Accident Insurance Company (SUVA).
Conflict of Interest
No conflicting interests.
- 1.Escorpizo R, Ekholm J, Gmünder HP, Cieza A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing a core set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2010.Google Scholar
- 3.Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury—facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010.Google Scholar
- 6.World Health Organization. WHO Rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with special emphasis on developing countries. Report of WHO expert committee. Geneva: WHO; 1993.Google Scholar
- 11.World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
- 24.Buijs PC, Lambeek LC, Koppenrade V, Hooftman WE, Anema JR. Can workers with chronic back pain shift from pain elimination to function restore at work? Qualitative evaluation of an innovative work related multidisciplinary programme. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(2):65–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Kvale S. Interviews- an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage; 1996.Google Scholar
- 31.Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1990.Google Scholar
- 38.Kirchberger I, Coenen M, Hierl FX, Dieterle C, Seissler J, Stucki G, et al. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for diabetes mellitus from the patient perspective using focus groups. Diabet Med. 2009;26(7):700–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Glaser BG, Strauss A. Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1967.Google Scholar
- 41.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory. Procedures and technique. 2nd ed. NewburyPark: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
- 42.Gradinger F, Köhler B, Khatami R, Mathis J, Cieza A, Bassetti C. Problems in functioning from the patient perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. J Sleep Res. 2010.Google Scholar
- 43.Tschiesner U, Linseisen E, Coenen M, Rogers S, Harreus U, Berghaus A, et al. Evaluating sequelae after head and neck cancer from the patient perspective with the help of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(3):425–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
- 45.Depoy E, Gitlin LN. Introduction to research. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.Google Scholar
- 46.Karlsson G. Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International; 1993.Google Scholar
- 50.Vierkant R. A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a kappa coefficient. Marshfield: Medical Research Foundation. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF. 2010.
- 51.United Nations Convention of the rights of Persons with Disabilities. In: U.NATIONS (Ed, New York, 2006).Google Scholar
- 57.Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2009.Google Scholar
- 58.Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 1997.Google Scholar
- 60.Knodel J. The design and analysis of focus group studies. In: Morgan DL, editor. Successful focus groups. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 35–50.Google Scholar
- 62.Carey A. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. 1994; 225–41.Google Scholar