Return-to-Work Activities in a Chinese Cultural Context
- 197 Downloads
Introduction Several studies have been conducted in the West showing that return to work (RTW) coordination is a key element to facilitate RTW of injured workers and to prevent work disabilities. However, no study has been carried out to investigate the scope of RTW activities in China. The purpose of this study was to explore the views of key RTW stakeholders on necessary activities for RTW coordination. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Guangdong province of China. A three-tiered approach including focus group discussions and panel reviews was used to collect RTW activities, analyze the content validity, and classify domains. Descriptive statistics and intra-class correlation (ICC) were used to describe the importance of RTW activities and the degree of agreement on the classification of different domains. A Kruskal–Wallis test with subsequent post-hoc analysis using multiple Mann–Whitney U tests was carried out to check for any differences in the domains of different RTW activities among RTW stakeholders. Results The domains of RTW activities in China were similar to those in the West and included workplace assessment and mediation, social problem solving, role and liability clarification, and medical advice. Good agreement (ICC: 0.729–0.844) on the classification of RTW activities into different domains was found. The domains of the RTW activities of healthcare providers differed from those of employers (P = 0.002) and injured workers (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between employers and injured workers. Conclusions This study indicated that differences among stakeholders were observed in terms of areas of relative priority. There is a clear need for research and training in China to establish a nation-wide terminology for RTW coordination, facilitate cross-provincial studies and work toward a more integrated system addressing the diverse perspectives of stakeholders involved in the RTW process.
KeywordsReturn-to-work activities Domains of coordination RTW stakeholders Chinese cultural context
The authors would like to thank all those who took part in this study, especially Mr. Yan-Wen Xu from the Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Centre who was the project coordinator and helped arrange the focus groups discussions, the panel reviews, and other administrative work during the study. This work was supported by the Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant(s) FRN: 53909.
- 1.Wikipedia. World population. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population. 2010.
- 2.Escobar P. Guangdong, the unstoppable “world’s factory”. Asia Times Online. Retrieved from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/GA25Ad05.html. 2010.
- 3.Chen G. The constitution of work injury insurance system and the development of work injury rehabilitation in China. Proceedings of 2009 international seminar on work injury rehabilitation: challenges of 21st century occupational rehabilitation. Guangzhou, China; 2009.Google Scholar
- 4.Tian XB, Zhou XZ. Social security in China. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press; 2006.Google Scholar
- 5.Li Z. Realistic option for the work injury rehabilitation system in China. Proceeding of national symposium on work injury rehabilitation. Guangzhou, China; 2005.Google Scholar
- 6.China Labour Bulletin. Compensation for work-related injury and occupational disease in China. Retrieved from http://www.china-labour.org.hk/en/node/100207; 2009.
- 10.Szymanski E, Parker G, Ryan C, Nerz M, Trevino-Espinoza B, Johnston-Rodriguez S. Work and disability: basic constructs. In: Szymanski E, Parker R, editors. Work and disability. Austin, TX: Pro-ed; 2003.Google Scholar
- 21.Krueger RA. Quality control in focus group research. In: Morgan DL, editor. Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. California: Sage; 1993. p. 65–85.Google Scholar
- 22.Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
- 24.Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: application to practice. Prentice-Hall, NJ; 2000, pp. 560–7.Google Scholar
- 30.Seff MA, Gecas V, Ray MP. Injury and depression: the mediating effects of self-concept. Soc Perspect. 1992;35(4):573–91.Google Scholar
- 31.Dawis RV, Lofquist LH. A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1984.Google Scholar
- 36.Stowell AW, McGeary DD. Musculoskeletal injury: a three-stage continuum form cause to disability to decision. In: Schultz IZ, Gatche RJ, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
- 37.Kelly M, Field D. Comments on the rejection of biomedical model in sociological discourse. Med Sociol News. 1994;19(3):34–7.Google Scholar
- 43.Zhuo DH. Education and training of the professionals in work injury rehabilitation. Proceedings of 2009 international seminar on work injury rehabilitation: challenges of 21st century occupational rehabilitation. Guangzhou, China; 2009.Google Scholar
- 46.Shrey D, Lacerte M. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Winter Park, FL: GR Press; 1995.Google Scholar
- 48.Bruyère S, Shrey D. Disability management in industry: a joint labor-management process. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1991;34(3):227–42.Google Scholar
- 54.Zhang J. The role of trade unions under the corporatist model. Theory Pract Trade Unions. 2001;1:1–6.Google Scholar
- 55.Sun CL. Protecting workers’ rights or serving the party: the way forward for China’s trade unions. China Labour Bulletin, 2009.Google Scholar
- 57.Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2000;17(1):11–22.Google Scholar