Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 220–227 | Cite as

The Return-To-Work Coordinator Role: Qualitative Insights for Nursing

  • Carole James
  • Erica Southgate
  • Ashley Kable
  • Darren A. Rivett
  • Maya Guest
  • Joanna Bohatko-Naismith
Article

Abstract

Introduction Few studies have examined the role of RTW Coordination from the perspective of RTW Coordinator’s. Furthermore there is little health specific literature on returning injured nurses to work despite the critical workforce shortages of these professionals. The study aimed to examine barriers and facilitators identified by the RTW Coordinator to returning injured nurses to work and influences on specific health sector or geographic location. The study sought to gain insights into the professional backgrounds and everyday work practices of RTW Coordinators. Method Five focus groups were conducted in metropolitan and rural areas of NSW, Australia. Twenty-five RTW Coordinators from 14 different organisations participated in the study. The focus groups included participants representing different health sectors (aged, disability, public and private hospital and community health). Results The data analysis identified information pertaining to the qualifications and backgrounds of RTW Coordinators; the role of RTW Coordinators’ within organisational structures; a range of technical knowledge and personal qualities for RTW Coordination and important elements of the case management style used to facilitate RTW. Conclusions The findings identified a wide range of professional backgrounds that RTW Coordinators bring to the role and the impact of organisational structures on the ability to effectively undertake RTW responsibilities. The study found that interpersonal skills of RTW Coordinators may be more important to facilitate RTW than a healthcare background. A collaborative case management style was also highlighted and the difficulties associated with juggling conflicts of interest, multiple organisational roles and the emotional impact of the work.

Keywords

Workplace based return to work RTW coordinators Health sector Qualitative 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded under the WorkCover NSW WorkCover Assist Program. The research conclusions are those of the authors and any views expressed are not necessarily those of WorkCover NSW.

Conflicts of interests

The authors were employees of the University of Newcastle during the conduct of this study. These authors and organisation have no financial interests that may be affected by the content of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Nelson A, Fragala G, Mensel N. Myths and facts about back injuries in nursing. Am J Nurs. 2003;103:32–40.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang EM, Daly JW, Hancock KM, Bidewell J, Johnson A, Lambert VA, et al. The relationships among workplace stressors, coping methods, demographic characteristics, and health in Australian nurses. J Prof Nurs. 2006;22(1):30–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duckett D. Health workforce design for the 21st century. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(2):201–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senate Community Affairs References Committee: The patient profession: time for action: report on the inquiry into nursing (2002) [cited 29/04/2009; Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/Committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2002-04/nursing/report/index.htm.
  5. 5.
    Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, et al. Nurse turnover: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(2):237–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw W, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foreman P, Murphy G, Swerissen H. Barriers and facilitators to return to work: a literature review. Melbourne: Australian Insitute for Primary Care, La Trobe University; 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roberts-Yates C. Employers’ perceptions of claims/injury management and rehabilitation in South Australia. Asia Pac J Hum Resour. 2006;44(1):102–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    WorkCover NSW. Guidelines for return to work programs. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8(5):499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Merriam SB. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics: Census geography paper 03/01 ASGC remoteness classification—purpose and use (2001) [cited July 2008]; Available from: www.abs.gov.au/…/f9c96fb635cce780ca256d420005dc02!OpenDocument -.
  17. 17.
    Fern E. Advanced focus group research. London: Sage; 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage; 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    QSRInternational. NVivo 7.0. Doncaster, Victoria:QSR International (2007).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erickson F, editor. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. New York: Macmillan; 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    WorkCover NSW. Guidelines for employers, return to work programs. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 2003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus study group. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Institute for Work & Health. Seven ‘principals’ for successful return to work. March 2007 [cited 31/03/2009; Available from: http://www.iwh.on.ca/seven-principles-for-rtw.
  24. 24.
    Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts-Yates C. Examining the role of rehabilitation in the South Australian workers compensation system. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2003;9(2):82–101.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenny D. Barriers to return to work in New South Wales: research findings and theoretical considerations. Sydney: WorkCover NSW; 1995.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langford E. Buried but not dead: a survey of occupational illness and injury incurred by nurses in the Victorian health service industry. The Australian Nursing Federation (Victorian Branch); 1997.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Case Management Society of America: What is a case manager and how do I find one? (2009) [cited 2009 18 August]; Available from: http:www.cmsa.org/Consumer/tabid/61/Default.aspx.
  29. 29.
    Beardwood B, Kirsh B, Clark N. Victims twice over: perceptions and experiences of injured workers. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):30–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of the return to work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parrish M, Schofield T. Injured workers experiences of the workers compensation claims process: institutional disrespect and the noeliberal state. Health Sociol Rev. 2005;14(1):33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nadler SF, Mulford GJ, Wagner KL, Stitik TP, Malanga GA, Levy AS, et al. Improving the workers compensation system: case management perspective. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(1):97–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Roberts-Yates C. The Dilemma of the case manager in workers’ compensation : decision-maker, system player, para legal/medical specialist, mediator or enermy? Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2002; 8(2); 99–113.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hochschild A. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):129–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andersen LP, Kines P, Hasle P. Owner attitudes and self reported behavior towards modified work after occupational injury absence in small enterprises: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):107–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seland K, Cherry N, Beach J. A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49(3):197–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work. 2007;29:155–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jansson I, Bjorklund A. The experience of returning to work. Work. 2007;28(2):121–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Higgs J. Communicating in the health sciences. 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kenny D. Case management in occupational rehabilitation: would the real case manager please stand up? Aust J Rehabil Couns. 1995;1(2):104–17.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sager L, James C. Injured workers’ perspectives of their rehabilitation process under the New South Wales workers compensation system. Aust Occup Ther J. 2005;52(2):127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):159–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carole James
    • 1
  • Erica Southgate
    • 2
  • Ashley Kable
    • 3
  • Darren A. Rivett
    • 1
  • Maya Guest
    • 1
  • Joanna Bohatko-Naismith
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Health Sciences, Faculty of HealthUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Education, Faculty of Education and ArtsUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of HealthUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations