Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 275–285 | Cite as

The Concept of Work Ability

  • Per-Anders Tengland
Article

Abstract

Introduction The concept of “work ability” is central for many sciences, especially for those related to working life and to rehabilitation. It is one of the important concepts in legislation regulating sickness insurance. How the concept is defined therefore has important normative implications. The concept is, however, often not sufficiently well defined. Aim and Method The objective of this paper is to clarify, through conceptual analysis, what the concept can and should mean, and to propose a useful definition for scientific and practical work. Results Several of the defining characteristics found in the literature are critically scrutinized and discussed, namely health, basic standard competence, occupational competence, occupational virtues, and motivation. These characteristics are related to the work tasks and the work environment. One conclusion is that we need two definitions of work ability, one for specific jobs that require special training or education, and one for jobs that most people can manage given a short period of practice. Having work ability, in the first sense, means having the occupational competence, the health required for the competence, and the occupational virtues that are required for managing the work tasks, assuming that the tasks are reasonable and that the work environment is acceptable. In the second sense, having work ability is having the health, the basic standard competence and the relevant occupational virtues required for managing some kind of job, assuming that the work tasks are reasonable and that the work environment is acceptable. Conclusion These definitions give us tools for understanding and discussing the complex, holistic and dynamic aspects of work ability, and they can lay the foundations for the creation of instruments for evaluating work ability, as well as help formulate strategies for rehabilitation.

Keywords

Health Competence Definition Work ability Work disability Work environment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Lennart Nordenfelt, Kerstin Ekberg and the research group at FAR at Linköping University, Bengt Brülde, and Katarina Graah-Hagelbäck for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. This work has been financed by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Fleishman EA, Reilly ME. Handbook of human abilities: definitions, measurements and job task requirements. Bethseda, MD: Management Research Institute, Inc; 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DOT 2009. Dictionary of Occupational Titles. [Revised 2003 Apr 18; Cited 2009 Mar 3] Available from http://www.occupationalinfo.org/.
  3. 3.
    Nordenfelt L. The concept of work ability. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuoppala J, Lamminpää A, Husman P. Work health promotion, job well-being, and sickness absences—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(11):1216–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandqvist JL, Henriksson CM. Work functioning: a conceptual framework. Work. 2004;23:147–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boer WEL de. Quality of evaluation of work disability. Ph D Thesis. TNO: Hoofddorp, 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Westerhäll L. Rättsliga aspekter på arbetsoförmåga på grund av sjukdom. [Legal aspects on work ability due to disease.] Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 1997; 8–9: 356–365.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swedish Government Bill, 1962:381. Lagen om allmän försäkring [The National Insurance Act]. Stockholm: Ministry of Social Affairs, 1962.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    SOU 2008:66. Arbetsförmåga? En översikt av bedömningsmetoder i Sverige och andra länder [Work ability? A survey of assessment methods in Sweden and in other countries.] Stockholm: Socialdepartementet, 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare] [Updated 2005; Cited 2005 Oct 21]. Available from http://www.sos.se/sosfs/1992_16/1992_16.htm.
  11. 11.
    SOU 1997:166. Ohälsoförsäkringen: Trygghet och aktivitet [Ill health insurance: Safety and activity]. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baggini J. Fosl PS. The philosopher’s toolkit. A compendium of philosophical concepts and methods. Oxford: Blackwell; 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Audi R. Action, intention and reason. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nordenfelt L. On the nature of health: an action-theoretic approach, second revised edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1995.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tengland P-A. Begreppet arbetsförmåga [The Concept of Work Ability]. Linköpings Universitet: IHS Rapport, 2006:1.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [2008 Sep 17; Cited 2009 Dec 21] Available from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-kinds/
  17. 17.
    Carnap R. The logical foundation of probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1971.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayer AJ. The central questions of philosophy. London: Penguin Books; 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ilmarinen J. Functional capacities and work ability as predictors of good 3rd age. In: Shiraki K, Sagawa S, Mohamed Yousef K, editors. Physical fitness and health promotion in active ageing. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 2001. p. 61–80.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Westerholm P, Bostedt G. Kan företagshälsovården lösa sjukskrivningskrisen? [Can the Industrial Health Service solve the crisis in sick-listing?]. In: Hogstedt C, Bjurvald M, Marklund S, Palmer E, Theorell T, editors. Den höga sjukfrånvaron—sanning och konsekvens. Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2004. p. 303–44.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brülde B. Arbetsförmåga: Begrepp och etik [Work ability: Concepts and ethics]. In: Vahlne Westerhäll L, editor. Arbets(o)förmåga—ur ett mångdisciplinärt perspektiv. Santérus förlag: Stockholm; 2008. p. 195–224.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Velozo CA. Work evaluations: critique of the state of the art of functional assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47:203–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Innes E, Straker L. A clinician’s guide to work-related assessments, 2—Design problems. Work. 1998;11:191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nordenfelt L. Action theory, disability and ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1075–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boorse C. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science. 1977;44:542–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pörn I. An equilibrium model of health. In: Lindahl I, Nordenfelt L, editors. Health, disease and causal explanations in medicine. Dordrecht: Reidel; 1984. p. 3–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    WHO. Official Records of the World Health Organization, 1948; 2, 100.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tengland P-A. A two-dimensional theory of health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2007;28(4):257–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    UNICEF. Childhood under threat. The state of the world’s children [2005; Cited 2009 Dec 1] Available from http://www.unicef.org/sowc05/english/index.html
  31. 31.
    Nordenfelt L. On ability, opportunity and competence: an inquiry into people’s possibility for action. In: Holmström-Hintikka G, Toumela R, editors. Contemporary action theory, vol I. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1997. p. 145–58.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ryle G. Collected papers. New York: Barnes and Noble; 1971.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. Mind over machine. New York: Free Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Culver CM, Gert B. Philosophy in medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tengland P-A. Health promotion and disease prevention: logically different conceptions? Health Care Anal. 2009; doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0125-0.
  36. 36.
    Johansson G, Lundberg I. Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence of attendance, empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1857–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brülde B. Långtidfrisk eller långtidssjukskriven? [Long-term healthy or long-term sick-listed?] Del 1 [Part 1]. Report 2005:02. University West.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Freud S. Orientering i Psykoanalysen [German original: Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse, and Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse]. Natur och Kultur: Stockholm; 1955.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maslow A. Motivation and personality. HarperCollins: New York; 1987.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rachels J, Rachels S. The elements of moral philosophy. London: McGraw-Hill; 2006.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:975–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Järvholm B, Netz P. Arbetsförmåga [Work ability]. In: Järvholm B, Olofsson C, editors. Försäkringsmedicin [Insurance Medicine]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2002. p. 36–40.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Costa G, Goedhard WJA, Ilmarinen J. Assessment and promotion of work ability, health and well-being of ageing workers. International Congress Series. No. 1280. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health, Health and SocietyMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations