Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 180–198 | Cite as

Workplace Health Understandings and Processes in Small Businesses: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Literature

  • Ellen MacEachen
  • Agnieszka Kosny
  • Krista Scott-Dixon
  • Marcia Facey
  • Lori Chambers
  • Curtis Breslin
  • Natasha Kyle
  • Emma Irvin
  • Quenby Mahood
  • The Small Business Systematic Review Team
Article

Abstract

Introduction Small businesses (SBs) play an important role in global economies, employ half of all workers, and pose distinct workplace health problems. This systematic review of qualitative peer-reviewed literature was carried out to identify and synthesize research findings about how SB workplace parties understand and enact processes related to occupational health and safety (OHS). Methods The review was conducted as part of a larger mixed-method review and in consultation with stakeholders. A comprehensive literature search identified 5067 studies. After screening for relevance, 20 qualitative articles were identified. Quality assessment led to 14 articles of sufficient quality to be included in the meta-ethnographic findings synthesis. Results This review finds that SBs have distinctive social relations of work, apprehensions of workplace risk, and legislative requirements. Eight themes were identified that consolidate knowledge on how SB workplace parties understand OHS hazards, how they manage risk and health problems, and how broader structures, policies and systems shape the practice of workplace health in SBs. The themes contribute to ‘layers of evidence’ that address SB work and health phenomena at the micro (e.g. employer or worker behavior), meso (e.g. organizational dynamics) and macro (e.g. state policy) levels. Conclusions This synthesis details the unique qualities and conditions of SBs that merit particular attention from planners and occupational health policy makers. In particular, the informal workplace social relations can limit workers’ and employers’ apprehension of risk, and policy and complex contractual conditions in which SBs are often engaged (such as chains of subcontracting) can complicate occupational health responsibilities. This review questions the utility of SB exemptions from OHS regulations and suggests a legislative focus on the particular needs of SBs. It considers ways that workers might activate their own workplace health concerns, and suggests that more qualitative research on OHS solutions is needed. It suggests that answers to the SB OHS problems identified in this review might lie in third party interventions and improved worker representation.

Keywords

Qualitative research Systematic review Prevention Small business Occupational health 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Ontario Workplace Safety & Insurance Board Prevention Reviews Initiative and The Institute for Work & Health. We thank the scholars who assisted with the assessment and translation of some papers in this review, and also the reviewer of this paper for the helpful suggestions for improvement. We are grateful to Shanti Raktoe and Diana Pugliese for their editorial support.

References

  1. 1.
    The Small Business Economy. Report to the President. [Website] 2009 [cited 2009 Nov 17, 2009]; Available from: http://www.sba.gov/advo/research/sb_econ2009.pdf.
  2. 2.
    State USDo. Small Business in the United States. 2009 [cited 2009 June 19, 2009]; Available from: http://economics.about.com/od/smallbigbusiness/a/us_business.htm.
  3. 3.
    Canada I. Small business research and policy: key small business statistics. [Website] 2005 [cited 2009 June 24, 2009]; Available from: http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/sbrp-rppe.nsf/eng/rd01224.htm.
  4. 4.
    Audretsch D, van der Horst R, Kwaak T, Thurisk R. First section of the annual report on EU small and medium-sized enterprise. [Report on Website] 2009 [cited 2009 19 Nov 2009]; Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/craft/sme_perf_review/doc_08/spr08_annual_reporten.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Walters D. Working safety in small enterprises in Europe: toward a sustainable system for worker participation and representation. Brussels: European Trade Union Confederation 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabiano B, Currò F, Pastorino R. A study of the relationship between occupational injuries and firm size and type in the Italian industry. Saf Sci. 2004;42:587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frick K. Health and safety representation in small firms: a Swedish success under threat. In: Walters D, Nichols T, editors. Workplace Health and Safety–International Perspectives on Worker Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian; 2009. p. 154–67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McVittie D, Banikin H, Brocklebank W. He effects of firm size on injury frequency in construction. Saf Sci. 1997;27(1):19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sorensen O, Hasle P, Bach E. Working in small enterprise–Is there a special risk? Saf Sci. 2007;45:1044–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health NIfOSa. Identifying high-risk small-business industries: the basis for preventing occupational injury, illness, and fatality. Cincinatti, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lentz TJ, Wenzl TB. Small businesses with high fatality rates: assessment of hazards and their prevention. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006;3(2):D8–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasle P, Limborg HJ. A review of the literature on preventive occupational health and safety in small enterprises. Ind Health. 2006;44:6–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lamm F, Walters D. Regulating occupational health and safety in small businesses. In: Bluff E, Gunningham N, Johnstone R, editors. OHS regulation for a changing world of work. Sydney: The Federation Press; 2004. p. 94–119.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antonsson A. Small companies. 1997. p. 466–77.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamm F. A research design for Occupational Health and Safety in the small business sector 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olson E. A move to ease safety rules for some employers. New York Times 2009. C6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacEachen E, Breslin C, Kyle N, Irvin E, Kosny A, Bigelow P, et al. Effectiveness and Implementation of Health and Safety in small enterprises. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Breslin C, Kyle N, Bigelow P, Irvin E, Morassaei S, MacEachen E, et al. Effectiveness of health and safety in small enterprises: A systematic review of quantitative evaluations of interventions. J Occup Rehabil. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9212-1.
  19. 19.
    Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pope C, Mays N, Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: a guide to methods. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2007.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacEachen E, Chambers L, Clarke J, Mahood Q. Literature on work and health in small businesses. Toronto: Prevention Intitaives, WSIB; 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spencer L, Ritchie J, Lewis J, Dillon L. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence: National Centre for Social Research; 2003 June. Report No.: Occasional Papers Series No. 2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scan J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eakin JM, Mykhalovskiy E. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):187–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barbour RS, Barbour M. Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: the need to develop a distinctive approach. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):179–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noblit G, Hare R. Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications; 1988.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:671–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Corneliusson F. The impact of regulations on firms: a case study of the biotech industry. Law Policy. 2005;27(3):429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eakin JM, MacEachen E. Health and social relations of work: a study of health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illn. 1998;20(6):896–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eakin JM. Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspectives on the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(4):689–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Clarke J. ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Practi Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–42.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mayhew C, Quinlan M. Subcontracting and occupational health and safety in the residential building industry. Ind Relat J. 1997;28(3):192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andersen L, Kiens P, Hasle P. Owner attitudes and self reported behavior towards modified work after occupational injury absence in small enterprises: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aragon A, Aragon C, Thorn A. Pests, peasants and pesticides on the northern Nicaraguian Pacific plain. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001;7:295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eakin JM, Cava M, Smith TF. From theory to practice: a determinants approach to workplace health promotion in small businesses. Health Promot Pract. 2001;2(2):172–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holmes NLH, Yesilyurt Z, De Munk F. An exploratory study of meanings of risk control for long term and acute effect occupational health and safety risks in small business construction firms. J Safety Res. 1999;30(4):251–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Niewohner J, Cox P, Garrard S, Pidgeon N. Evaluating the efficacy of a mental models approach for improving occupational chemical risk protection. Risk Anal. 2004;24(2):349–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shain M, Eakin JM, Suurvali H, Currie A. Small business owners and the management of employees with problems: a descriptive study. Employee Assistance Q. 1998;14(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Walters D. Health and safety and trade union workplace organisation: a case study in the printing industry. Ind Relat J. 1987;18(1):40–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walters D. Health and safety strategies in a changing Europe. Int J Health Serv. 1998;28(2):305–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wulfhorst B, Schobel K, Schwanitz X. Prevention of work-related skin diseases in hairdressers First results. Prev Rehabil. 1996;8(1):22–8.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Akande A. Coping with entrepreneurial stress: a Nigerian case study. Leadersh Org Dev J. 1992;13(2):27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dugdill LKC, Barlow J, Nevin I, Platt G. The development and uptake of health and safety interventions aimed at small businesses. Health Educ J. 2000;59(2):157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fishwick T. Human factors in small and medium sized enterprises–some safety problems and solutions. Loss Prevention Bulletin (Rugby) 2005.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hetzel CFT, Weber A, Schian HM. Problems of implementing integration management at company level in small and medium-sized enterprises [German]. Gesundheitswesen. 2006;68(5):303–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Johansson J, Johansson B. Work environment functions in small enterprises in Sweden. Appl Ergon. 1992;23(2):91–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lingard H. The effect of first aid training on Australian construction workers’ occupational health and safety motivation and risk control behavior. J Safety Res. 2002;33(2):209–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Walters D. Employee representation on health and safety in small enterprises. Employee Relat. 1998;20(2):164–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pawson R. Digging for nuggets: How ‘bad’ research can yield ‘good’ evidence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006;9(2):127–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Massey C. Growing small and medium enterprises in New Zealand: He tangata, he tangata, he tangata. An inaugural professorial address. Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand 2007.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Watson T. Entrepreneurial action, identity work and the use of multiple discursive resources. Int Small Bus J. 2009;27(3):251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Matlay H. Employee relations in small firms. A Micro-business perspective. Employee Relat. 1999;21(3):285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Coviello NE, Brodie RJ, Munro HJ. An investigation of marketing practice by firm size. J Bus Ventur. 2000;15:523–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Marlow S. Regulating labour management in small firms. Hum Resour Manag J. 2002;12(3):25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Marlow S, Patton D. Minding the gap between employers and employees. The challenge for owner-managers of smaller manufacturing firms. Employee Relat. 2002;24(5):523–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J. You are free to set your own hours: governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(5):1019–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zoller HM. Manufacturing health: employee perspectives on problematic outcomes in a workplace health promotion initiative. West J Commun. 2004;68(3):278–301.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Frick K, Walters D. Worker representation n health and safety in small enterprises: lessons from a Swedish approach. Int Labour Rev. 1998;137(3):367–89.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ram M, Edwards P, Gilman M, Arrowsmith J. The dynamics of informality: employment relations in small firms and the effects of regulatory change. Work Employ Soc. 2001;15(4):845–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Quinlan M. The implications of labour market restructuring in industrialised societies for occupatiopnal health and safety. Stockholm: National Institute fro Working Life; 1997.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Quinlan M. Submission to the standing committee on law and justice: Inquiry into workplace health and safety in New South Wales. Sydney, University of New South Wales, Department of Industrial Relations and Organisational Behaviour 1997.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kramer D, Bigelow P, Peter V, Garritano E, Carlan N, Wells R. Spreading good ideas: a case study of the adoption of an innovation in the contruction sector. Appl Ergon. 2008;40:826–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Walters D. One step forward, two steps back: worker representation and health and safety in the United Kingdom. Occup Health Policy. 2006;36(1):87.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Walters D. Worker representation and health and safety in small enterprises in Europe. Ind Relat J. 2004;35(2):169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellen MacEachen
    • 1
    • 4
  • Agnieszka Kosny
    • 1
    • 4
  • Krista Scott-Dixon
    • 1
  • Marcia Facey
    • 2
  • Lori Chambers
    • 3
  • Curtis Breslin
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Natasha Kyle
    • 1
  • Emma Irvin
    • 1
  • Quenby Mahood
    • 1
  • The Small Business Systematic Review Team
  1. 1.Institute for Work & HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of NursingUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.The Ontario HIV NetworkTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Seneca CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations