Early Patient Screening and Intervention to Address Individual-Level Occupational Factors (“Blue Flags”) in Back Disability
- 1.1k Downloads
Objective To develop a consensus plan for research and practice to encourage routine clinician screening of occupational factors associated with long-term back disability. Methods A 3-day conference workshop including 21 leading researchers and clinicians (the “Decade of the Flags Working Group”) was held to review the scientific evidence concerning clinical, occupational, and policy factors in back disability and the development of feasible assessment and intervention strategies. Results The Working Group identified seven workplace variables to include in early screening by clinicians: physical job demands, ability to modify work, job stress, workplace social support or dysfunction, job satisfaction, expectation for resuming work, and fear of re-injury. Five evaluation criteria for screening methods were established: reliability, predictive performance, feasibility, acceptability, and congruence with plausible interventions. An optimal screening method might include a stepped combination of questionnaire, interview, and worksite visit. Future research directions include improving available assessment methods, adopting simpler and more uniform conceptual frameworks, and tying screening results to plausible interventions. Discussion There is a clear indication that occupational factors influence back disability, but to expand clinician practices in this area will require that patient screening methods show greater conceptual clarity, feasibility, and linkages to viable options for intervention.
KeywordsBack pain Back disability Occupational factors Screening Early intervention
The authors would like to acknowledge other members of the “Decade of the Flags” Working Group who contributed to the discussions and conclusions presented in this article: Mansel Aylward, Kim Burton, Peter Croft, Michael Feuerstein, Charles Greenough, Elaine Hay, Nick Kendall, Clement Leech, Michael Nicholas, Ceri Phillips, Glenn Pransky, Mick Sullivan, Johan Vlaeyen, Michael von Korff, Gordon Waddell, and Paul Watson. Also, special thanks to the Conference Organizing Committee at Keele University: Jo Bailey, Jan Cohen, Kate Dunn, Zoe Mayson, Sue Weir, Ross Wilkie, and Gwenllian Wynne-Jones. Sponsors of the 3-day conference included HCML, Healthcare RM, Ceridian, Rolls-Royce, and Rehab Works, Ltd.
- 10.Waddell G. The back pain revolution. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 153–77.Google Scholar
- 17.Costa-Black KM, Durand MJ, Imbeau D, Baril R, Loisel P. Interdisciplinary team discussion on work environment issues related to low back disability: a multiple case study. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2007;28:249–65.Google Scholar
- 23.New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation. Assessing yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. 1997, p. 23–66.Google Scholar
- 25.Main, C.J. Concepts of treatment and prevention in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Linton,SJ, editor. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Pain research and clinical management, 2002, vol. 12 (p. 47–63).Google Scholar
- 27.Frost P, Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Reduction of pain-related disability in working populations: a randomized intervention study of the effects of an educational booklet addressing psychosocial risk factors and screening workplaces for physical health hazards. Spine. 2007;32:1949–54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181342659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003.Google Scholar
- 46.Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Knol DL, Loisel P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(3):291–98. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000253604.90039.ad.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31.Google Scholar
- 49.Heneweer H, Aufdemkampe G, van Tulder MW, Kiers H, Stappaerts KH, Vanhees L. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. Spine. 2007;32(5):586–92. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Nicholas MK. Reducing disability in injured workers: the importance of collaborative management. In: Linton SJ, editor. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2002. p. 33–46.Google Scholar
- 55.Shaw WS, Robertson MM, McLellan RK, Verma SK, Pransky G. A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2006;26:107–14.Google Scholar