Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 64–80 | Cite as

Early Patient Screening and Intervention to Address Individual-Level Occupational Factors (“Blue Flags”) in Back Disability

  • William S. ShawEmail author
  • Danielle A. van der Windt
  • Chris J. Main
  • Patrick Loisel
  • Steven J. Linton
  • the “Decade of the Flags” Working Group
Article

Abstract

Objective To develop a consensus plan for research and practice to encourage routine clinician screening of occupational factors associated with long-term back disability. Methods A 3-day conference workshop including 21 leading researchers and clinicians (the “Decade of the Flags Working Group”) was held to review the scientific evidence concerning clinical, occupational, and policy factors in back disability and the development of feasible assessment and intervention strategies. Results The Working Group identified seven workplace variables to include in early screening by clinicians: physical job demands, ability to modify work, job stress, workplace social support or dysfunction, job satisfaction, expectation for resuming work, and fear of re-injury. Five evaluation criteria for screening methods were established: reliability, predictive performance, feasibility, acceptability, and congruence with plausible interventions. An optimal screening method might include a stepped combination of questionnaire, interview, and worksite visit. Future research directions include improving available assessment methods, adopting simpler and more uniform conceptual frameworks, and tying screening results to plausible interventions. Discussion There is a clear indication that occupational factors influence back disability, but to expand clinician practices in this area will require that patient screening methods show greater conceptual clarity, feasibility, and linkages to viable options for intervention.

Keywords

Back pain Back disability Occupational factors Screening Early intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge other members of the “Decade of the Flags” Working Group who contributed to the discussions and conclusions presented in this article: Mansel Aylward, Kim Burton, Peter Croft, Michael Feuerstein, Charles Greenough, Elaine Hay, Nick Kendall, Clement Leech, Michael Nicholas, Ceri Phillips, Glenn Pransky, Mick Sullivan, Johan Vlaeyen, Michael von Korff, Gordon Waddell, and Paul Watson. Also, special thanks to the Conference Organizing Committee at Keele University: Jo Bailey, Jan Cohen, Kate Dunn, Zoe Mayson, Sue Weir, Ross Wilkie, and Gwenllian Wynne-Jones. Sponsors of the 3-day conference included HCML, Healthcare RM, Ceridian, Rolls-Royce, and Rehab Works, Ltd.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Korff M, Saunders K. The course of back pain in primary care. Spine. 1996;21(24):2833–7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wasiak R, Kim J, Pransky G. Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: longer and more costly than in first episodes. Spine. 2006;31(2):219–25. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194774.85971.df.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quittan M. Management of back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:423–34. doi: 10.1080/09638280110108850.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deyo RA. Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain: reaching a specific diagnosis is often impossible. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1444–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.13.1444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tacci JA, Webster BS, Hashemi L, Christiani DC. Clinical practices in the management of new-onset, uncomplicated low back workers’ compensation disability claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41:397–404. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199905000-00008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hagen KB, Hilde G, Jamtvedt G, Winnem MF. The Cochrane review of advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica. Spine. 2002;27:1736–41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hazard RG, Reid S, Haugh LD, McFarlane G. A controlled trial of an educational pamphlet to prevent disability after occupational low back injury. Spine. 2000;25:1419–23. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waddell G, Burton AK. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:655–70. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waddell G, O’Connor M, Boorman S, Torsney B. Working Backs Scotland: a public and professional health education campaign for back pain. Spine. 2007;32:2139–43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814541bc.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Waddell G. The back pain revolution. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 153–77.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crook J, Milner R, Schultz IZ, Stringer B. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(4):277–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1020278708861.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Fitzgerald TE. Early prognosis for low back disability: intervention strategies for health care providers. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:815–28. doi: 10.1080/09638280110066280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine. 2000;25:2114–25. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linton SJ. Occupational psychological factors increase the risk for back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11:53–66. doi: 10.1023/A:1016656225318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Staal JB, Hlobil H, van Tulder MW, Waddell G, Burton AK, Koes BW, et al. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:618–26. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.9.618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med (Oxford, England). 2001;51:124–35. doi: 10.1093/occmed/51.2.124.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Costa-Black KM, Durand MJ, Imbeau D, Baril R, Loisel P. Interdisciplinary team discussion on work environment issues related to low back disability: a multiple case study. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2007;28:249–65.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, Gervais J, Falardeau M. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:581–90. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8036-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pransky G, Shaw WS, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:625–34. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001672517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cedraschi C, Allaz AF. How to identify patients with a poor prognosis in daily clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:577–91. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2005.03.002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feldman JB. The prevention of occupational low back pain disability: evidence-based reviews point in a new direction. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004;13:1–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaw WS, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors? J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16:591–605. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9061-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation. Assessing yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long-term disability and work loss. 1997, p. 23–66.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kendall NA. Psychosocial approaches to the prevention of chronic pain: the low back paradigm. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 1999;13:545–54. doi: 10.1053/berh.1999.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Main, C.J. Concepts of treatment and prevention in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Linton,SJ, editor. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Pain research and clinical management, 2002, vol. 12 (p. 47–63).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bartys S, Burton K, Main C. A prospective study of psychosocial risk factors and absence due to musculoskeletal disorders—implications for occupational screening. Occup Med. 2005;55:375–9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frost P, Haahr JP, Andersen JH. Reduction of pain-related disability in working populations: a randomized intervention study of the effects of an educational booklet addressing psychosocial risk factors and screening workplaces for physical health hazards. Spine. 2007;32:1949–54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181342659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:507–24. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8031-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work: a conceptual and scientific review. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steenstra IA, Verbeek JH, Heymans MW, Bongers PM. Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62:851–60. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hartvigsen J, Lings S, Leboeuf-Yde C, Bakketeig L. Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(1):e2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pransky G, Shaw WS, Fitzgerald TE. Prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: methodologic and practical considerations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2001;7:1811–25. doi: 10.1080/20018091095410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Linton SJ, Gross D, Schultz IZ, Main C, Cote P, Pransky G, et al. Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):459–74. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8028-x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loisel P. Pain in the workplace, compensation, and disability management. In: Schmidt RF, Willis WD, editors. Encyclopedia of pain. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 1703–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention—new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcome. 2001;9:351–60. doi: 10.2165/00115677-200109070-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sullivan MJ, Feuerstein M, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Pransky G. Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:475–89. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8029-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):38–43. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Patterson W, Linton SJ, Winters T. Patient clusters in acute, work-related back pain based on patterns of disability risk factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:185–93. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000254205.47334.c3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8034-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(2):327–52. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9071-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Linton SJ, Hallden K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14:209–15. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Meloche GR. Predicting return to work after low back injury using the psychosocial risk for occupational disability instrument: a validation study. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:365–76. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-5943-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shaw WS, Pransky G, Patterson W, Winters T. Early disability risk factors for low back pain assessed at outpatient occupational health clinics. Spine. 2005;30:572–80. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000154628.37515.ef.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Durand MJ, Loisel P, Hong QN, Charpentier N. Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):191–204. doi: 10.1023/A:1016846712499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:65–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1015056429505.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Anema JR, Steenstra IA, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Knol DL, Loisel P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32(3):291–98. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000253604.90039.ad.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Abenhaim L. Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Appl Ergon. 2001;32:53–60. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00038-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:607–31.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heneweer H, Aufdemkampe G, van Tulder MW, Kiers H, Stappaerts KH, Vanhees L. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. Spine. 2007;32(5):586–92. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hashemi L, Webster BS, Clancy EA, Volinn E. Length of disability and cost of workers’ compensation low back pain claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39:937–45. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199710000-00005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pransky G, Gatchel RJ, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:453–57. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8027-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Work-ready group. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2101–14. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00131-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nicholas MK. Reducing disability in injured workers: the importance of collaborative management. In: Linton SJ, editor. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2002. p. 33–46.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Training to optimize the response of supervisors to work injuries: needs assessment, design, and evaluation. AAOHN J. 2006;54:226–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, McLellan RK, Verma SK, Pransky G. A controlled case study of supervisor training to optimize response to injury in the food processing industry. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2006;26:107–14.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Derebery VJ, Giang GM, Saracino G, Fogarty WT. Evaluation of the impact of a low back pain educational intervention on physicians’ practice patterns and patients’ outcomes. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44:977–84. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200210000-00018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Noe C, Gardea M, Pulliam C, Thompson J. Treatment and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:1–9. doi: 10.1023/A:1021823505774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Linton SJ, Nordin E. A 5-year follow-up evaluation of the health and economic consequences of an early cognitive behavioral intervention for back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Spine. 2006;31:853–8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209258.42037.02.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, Fitzgerald TE. Prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: methodologic and practical considerations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2001;7:1811–25. doi: 10.1080/20018091095410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK. The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine. 2005;30:2579–84. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186589.69382.1d.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Shaw WS, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:2–15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • William S. Shaw
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Danielle A. van der Windt
    • 3
    • 4
  • Chris J. Main
    • 4
  • Patrick Loisel
    • 5
    • 6
  • Steven J. Linton
    • 7
    • 8
  • the “Decade of the Flags” Working Group
    • 9
  1. 1.Liberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyHopkintonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family Medicine & Community HealthUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.EMGO InstituteVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care CentreKeele UniversityStaffordshireUK
  5. 5.Centre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and RehabilitationHôpital Charles LeMoyneLongueuilCanada
  6. 6.Université de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  7. 7.Department of Behavioral, Social and Legal Sciences—Psychology & Örebro Medical Center HospitalÖrebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
  8. 8.Department of Occupational and Environmental MedicineÖrebroSweden
  9. 9.StaffordshireUK

Personalised recommendations