Advertisement

Vocational Rehabilitation Services and Employment Outcomes for People with Disabilities: A United States Study

  • Alo DuttaEmail author
  • Robert Gervey
  • Fong Chan
  • Chih-Chin Chou
  • Nicole Ditchman
Article

Abstract

Introduction This study examined the effect of vocational rehabilitation services on employment outcomes of people with sensory/communicative, physical, and mental impairments in the United States. Methods The sample frame includes 5,000 clients for each of the three disability groups whose cases were closed as either rehabilitated or not rehabilitated by state vocational rehabilitation agencies in the fiscal year 2005. The dependent variable is employment outcome. The predictor variables include a set of personal history variables and vocational rehabilitation service variables. Results Sixty-two percent of the clients in this study were gainfully employed after receiving vocational rehabilitation services. Individuals with sensory/communicative impairments had the highest success rate (75%) compared to 56% for the physical impairments group and 55% for those with mental impairments. Logistic regression analyses identified job placement, on-the-job support, maintenance, and other services (e.g., medical care for acute conditions) as significant predictors of employment success across all impairment groups. In addition, diagnostic and treatment (D&T) services (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.35–1.82) and rehabilitation technology services (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.67–2.33) were found to uniquely contribute to employment outcomes for the sensory impairments group as well as the physical impairments group (D&T services: OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15–1.48; RT services: OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13–1.75), but not the mental impairments group. Substantial counseling was associated with employment outcomes for the physical (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.32) and mental impairments groups (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03–1.35). Miscellaneous training (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09–1.49) was specifically associated with employment outcomes of the mental impairments group. Conclusion This study provides some empirical support documenting the association between vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes of people with disabilities.

Keywords

Vocational rehabilitation Employment Rehabilitation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by funding from the Rehabilitation Research Institute for Underrepresented Populations (National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Grant #H133A031705) at Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan F, Leahy M, Saunders J. Case management for rehabilitation health professionals (volume 1): foundational aspects. Osage Beach, MO: Aspen Professional Services; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruffaerts R, Sabbe M, Demyttenaere K. Effects of patient & health-system characteristics on community tenure of discharged psych inpatients. Psychiatr Serv (Washington DC). 2004;55:685–90. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.6.685.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dooley D, Fielding J, Levi L. Health and unemployment. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:449–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dooley D, Catalano R, Wilson G. Depression and unemployment: panel findings from the epidemiologic catchment area study. Am J Community Psychol. 1994;22(6):745–65. doi: 10.1007/BF02521557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dooley D, Catalano R, Hough R. Unemployment and alcohol disorder in 1910 and 1990: drift versus social causation. J Occup Org Psychol. 1992;65:277–90.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fawber HL, Wachter JF. Job Placement as a treatment component of the vocational rehabilitation process. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1987;2:27–33. doi: 10.1097/00001199-198703000-00006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kasl SV, Rodriguez E, Lasch KE. The impact of unemployment on health and well-being. In: Dohrenwend B, editor. Adversity, stress and psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 111–31.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lennon MC. Work and unemployment as stressors. In: Horwitz A, Scheid T, editors. A handbook for the study of mental health: social contexts, theories and systems. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 287–94.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linn MW, Sandifer R, Stein SS. Effects of unemployment on mental and physical health. Am J Public Health. 1985;75(5):502–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Dongen CJ. Quality of life and self-esteem in working and non-working persons with mental illness. Community Ment Health J. 1996;32:535–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02251064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marrone J, Golowka E. If you think work is bad for people with mental illness, then try poverty, unemployment, and social isolation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2000;23(2):187–93.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chan F, Wong DW, Rosenthal DA, Kundu MM, Dutta A. Eligibility rates of traditionally underserved individuals with disabilities revisited: a data mining approach. J Appl Rehabil Counsel. 2005;36(3):3–10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan F, Reid C, Roldan G, Kaskel L, Rahimi M, Mpofu E. Vocational assessment and evaluation of people with disabilities. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1997;8:311–25.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin S, Roessler R. Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process. 5th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. Vocational rehabilitation: better measures and monitoring could improve the performance of the VR program (GAO-05-865), Washington, DC; 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bellini J, Bolton B, Neath J. Rehabilitation counselors’ assessments of applicants’ functional limitations as predictors of rehabilitation services provided. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 1998;41(4):242–59.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bolton B, Bellini JL, Brookings JB. Predicting client employment outcomes from personal history, functional limitations, and rehabilitation services. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 2000;44:10–21. doi: 10.1177/003435520004400103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Capella-McDonnall ME. Predictors of competitive employment for blind and visually impaired consumers of vocational rehabilitation services. J Visual Impair Blind. 2005;99(5):303–15.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan F, Cheing G, Chan JYC, Rosenthal DA, Chronister JA. Predicting employment outcomes of rehabilitation clients with orthopedic disabilities: a CHAID analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:257–70. doi: 10.1080/09638280500158307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gamble D, Moore CL. The relation between VR services and employment outcomes of individuals with traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil. 2003;69:31–8.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaye HS. Vocational rehabilitation in the United States. Disabil Stat Abstr. 1998;20:1–4.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenthal DA, Chan F, Wong DW, Kundu M, Dutta A. Predicting employment outcomes based on race, gender, disability, work disincentives, and vocational rehabilitation service patterns. J Rehabil Adm. 2006;29:229–43.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hennessey JC. Factors affecting the work efforts of disabled worker beneficiaries. Soc Secur Bull. 1997;60:3–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Atkins BJ, Wright GN. Vocational rehabilitation of Blacks: the statement. J Rehabil. 1980;46(2):42–6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dziekan KI, Okocha AG. Accessibility of rehabilitation services: comparison by racial-ethnic status. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 1993;36:183–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herbert J, Martinez MY. Client ethnicity and vocational rehabilitation case service outcome. J Job Placement. 1992;8(1):10–6.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feist-Price S. African Americans with disabilities and equity in vocational rehabilitation services: one state’s review. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 1995;39(2):119–29.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson KB. Predicting vocational rehabilitation acceptance based on race, education, work status, and source of support at application. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 2000;43(2):97–105. doi: 10.1177/003435520004300205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wilson KB. Exploration of VR acceptance and ethnicity: a national investigation. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 2002;45(3):168–76. doi: 10.1177/003435520204500306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson KB. Vocational rehabilitation closure statuses in the United States: generalizing to the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. J Appl Rehabil Counsel. 2005;36(2):4–11.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ross MG, Biggi IM. Critical vocational rehabilitation service delivery issues at referral (02) and closure (08, 26, 28, 30) in serving select disabled persons. In: Walker S, Belgrave F, Banner AM, Nicholls RW, editors. Equal to the challenge: perspective, problems, and strategies in the rehabilitation of the nonwhite disabled: Proceedings of the National Conference. Howard University, Washington DC; 1986. p. 39–50.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cardoso E, Romero M, Chan F, Dutta A, Rahimi M. Disparities in vocational rehabilitation services for Hispanic consumer. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(2):85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Main L, Haig J. Occupational therapy and vocational rehabilitation: an audit of an outpatient occupational therapy service. Brit J Occup Therapy. 2006;69(6):288–92.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Horn W, Yoels W, Barolucci A. Factors associated with patients’ participation in rehabilitation services: a comparative injury analysis 12 months post-discharge. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(8):358–62. doi: 10.1080/096382800296601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alo Dutta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Gervey
    • 2
  • Fong Chan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chih-Chin Chou
    • 4
  • Nicole Ditchman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation and Disability StudiesSouthern UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Special EducationUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Stout Vocational Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of WisconsinStoutUSA
  4. 4.Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and School PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations