Leadership Qualities in the Return to Work Process: A Content Analysis
Introduction Supervisors have a core role to play in facilitating the safe and effective return to work (RTW) of employees on long-term sick leave. Previous studies have revealed that the risk of long-term sick leave increases with lower social support from the supervisor and lower management quality. The aim of this study was to elucidate leadership qualities that are valued in the RTW process of employees. Methods The study formed part of the Rogaland RTW study, and was designed as a qualitative case study that included interviews with subordinates (n = 30) on long-term sick leave (>8 weeks) and their supervisors (n = 28) from 19 companies. The informants represented a heterogeneous sample regarding diagnoses, types of occupations, positions, company sector, branches, and sizes. Qualitative and quantitative content analysis of the transcripts obtained during interviews identified leadership qualities. Results Three-hundred-and-forty-five descriptions of leadership qualities were identified, which were categorized into 78 distinct leadership qualities and 7 leadership types. The five most valued leadership qualities were “ability to make contact”, “being considerate”, “being understanding”, “being empathic”, and “being appreciative”. The three most valued leadership types were the Protector, Problem-Solver, and Contact-Maker. While the subordinates gave more descriptions to the Encourager, Recognizer, and Protector types, the supervisors described the Responsibility-Maker and Problem-Solver most often. The most frequent reported combination of types was the Protector and Problem-Solver, reported by 54% of the informants, while the most common three-types-combination was the Protector, Problem-Solver, and Contact-Maker reported by 37% of the informants. Conclusions This study revealed that there is a wide spectrum of valued leadership qualities, with those reported as being valuable differing between employees and supervisors.
KeywordsSick leave Disability management Return to work Content analysis Occupational rehabilitation Workplace Leadership Rogaland RTW study
We are very grateful to the 19 participating companies, especially to the 30 subordinates and 28 supervisors who shared their experiences with us. We also thank the funding sources: the National Research Council of Norway, Program for Work and Health, and the Norwegian Employers’ Organization (NHO) Working Environment fund.
- 1.Larsson G. Utvecklande ledarskap. Psykologtidningen 1999;12–3.Google Scholar
- 2.Hemphill HK. Relations between the size of the group and the behavior of “superior” leaders. J Soc Psychol. 1950;32:11–2.Google Scholar
- 3.Burns JH. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row; 1978.Google Scholar
- 4.Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press; 1985.Google Scholar
- 5.Fiedler F. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.Google Scholar
- 6.Nyberg A, Bernin P, Theorell T. The impact of leadership on the health of subordinates. SALTSA; Working life research in Europe; 2005. Report No.: 1:2005.Google Scholar
- 12.Sosial og helsedepartementet. NOU 2000:27. Sykefravær og uførepensjonering. Et inkluderende arbeidsliv. 2000.Google Scholar
- 13.Norwegian Government. Letter of intent regarding a more inclusive working life 2006–2009. http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/AID/temadokumenter/velferd/ia/A_more_inclusive_working_life_2006-2009.pdf. 2006. Ref Type: Internet Communication.
- 16.Cavanagh S. Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Res. 1997;4(3):5–16.Google Scholar
- 21.International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniformed requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publications. 2007. Report No.: Updated October 2007.Google Scholar
- 22.House J. Work, stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing; 1981.Google Scholar
- 23.Johnsen JV. The impact of workplace social support, job demands and work controlupon cardiovascular disease in Sweden. Stockholm: Department of Psychology; 1986.Google Scholar
- 25.Karasek R, Theorell T. Health work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. USA: Basic Books, A division of Harper Collins Publishers; 1990.Google Scholar
- 28.Hursh N, Rosenthal D. Dynamic changes in the field of disability management: responding to employer needs with broader responsibilities. Case Manag. 2005;11:16–22.Google Scholar
- 32.Chan F, Taylor D, Currier K, Chan CCH, Wood C, Lie A, et al. Disability management practitioners: a work behavior analysis. J Vocat Rehabil. 2000;15:47–56.Google Scholar
- 33.Caggianelli P. New skills, expertise needed for disability managers as part of workplace teams. Case Manag. 2006;12:15.Google Scholar