Advertisement

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 507–524 | Cite as

Prevention of Work Disability Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Challenge of Implementing Evidence

  • Patrick LoiselEmail author
  • Rachelle Buchbinder
  • Rowland Hazard
  • Robert Keller
  • Inger Scheel
  • Maurits van Tulder
  • Barbara Webster
Article

Abstract

Background: The process of returning disabled workers to work presents numerous challenges. In spite of the growing evidence regarding work disability prevention, little uptake of this evidence has been observed. One reason for limited dissemination of evidence is the complexity of the problem, as it is subject to multiple legal, administrative, social, political, and cultural challenges. Purpose and methods: A literature review and collection of experts' opinion is presented, on the current evidence for work disability prevention, and barriers to evidence implementation. Recommendations are presented for enhancing implementation of research results. Conclusion: The current evidence regarding work disability prevention shows that some clinical interventions (advice to return to modified work and graded activity programs) and some non-clinical interventions (at a service and policy/community level but not at a practice level) are effective in reducing work absenteeism. Implementation of evidence in work disability is a major challenge because intervention recommendations are often imprecise and not yet practical for immediate use, many barriers exist, and many stakeholders are involved. Future studies should involve all relevant stakeholders and aim at developing new strategies that are effective, efficient, and have a potential for successful implementation. These studies should be based upon a clearer conceptualization of the broader context and inter-relationships that determine return to work outcomes.

Key Words

work disability occupational health health plan implementation evidence-based medicine intervention studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Forssell MZ. The back school. Spine 1981; 6: 104–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waddell G. Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 1987; 12: 632–644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feurerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehabil 1991; 1: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 54–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults. Spine 2001; 26: 262–269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hlobil H, Staal JB, Spoelstra M, Ariëns GAM, Smid T, van Mechelen W. The effectiveness of a return to work intervention for sub-acute low back pain: A systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005; 31: 249–257.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: A review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998; 8: 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Systematic review. BMJ 2001; 322: 1511–1516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schonstein E, Kenny DT, Keating J, Koes BW. Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003: CD001822.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Reid S, McFarlane G, MacDonald L. Early physician notification of patient disability risk and clinical guidelines after low back injury: A randomized, controlled trial. Spine 1997; 22: 2951–2958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verbeek JH, van der Weide WE, van Dijk FJ. Early occupational health management of patients with back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2002; 27: 1844–1851; discussion 1851.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Lemaire J. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997; 22: 2911–2918.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rossignol M, Abenhaim L, Seguin P, Neveu A, Collet JP, Ducruet T, Shapiro S. Coordination of primary health care for back pain. A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2000; 25: 251–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine 2000; 25: 1973–1976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 1995; 20: 473–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001; 26: 2535–2542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, Carling C, Oxman AD. Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Spine 2002; 27: 2734–2740.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunt HA, Habeck RV. The Michigan disability prevention study: Research highlights. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, Pransky G, McLellan RK. Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 129–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shaw WS, Robertson MM, McLellan RK, Verma S, Pransky GA. Controlled study of supervisor training to optimize injury response in the meatpacking industry. Work (in press).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Waddell G. Models of disability: Using low back pain as an example. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burton AK. Spine update: Back injury and work loss. Spine 1997; 22: 2575–2580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Redman S, Spencer EA, Sanson-Fisher RW. The role of mass media in changing health-related behaviour: A critical appraisal of two methods. Health Promot Int 1990; 5: 85–101.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grilli R, Freemantle N, Minozzi S, Domenighetti G, Finer D. Mass media interventions: Effects on health services utilisation.[update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 1: CD000389; PMID: 11869574]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000: CD000389.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: Three part evaluation. BMJ 2001; 322: 1516–1520.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buchbinder R, Jolley D. Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: Three year follow up population survey. BMJ 2004; 328: 321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Staal JB, Hlobil H, van Tulder MW, Waddell G, Burton AK, Koes BW, van Mechelen W. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: An international comparison. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 618–626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 153: 1423–1431.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O'Brien MA. Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001; 39: II2–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD. Active sick leave for patients with back pain: All the players onside, but still no action. Spine 2002; 27: 654–659.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lomas J. Teaching old (and not so old) dogs new tricks: Effective ways to implement research findings. In: Dunn EV, Norton PG, Stewart M, Tudiver F, MJ Bass, ed. Disseminating research/changing practice. London: Sage, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Forstlund L, Toward evidence-based public health practice. Dissertation thesis. Oslo: Faculty of medicine, University of Oslo, 2004.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovation, 4th edn. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Is evidence-based implementation of evidence-based care possible? Med J Aust 2004; 180: s50–s51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Caplan N, Morrison A, Stambaugh RJ. The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at national level: A report to respondents. Michigan: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan (Ann Arbor), 1975.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: A systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002; 7: 239–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—Current models and opportunities for improvement. Disab Rehabil 2004; 26: 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schers H, Braspenning J, Drijver R, Wensing M, Grol R. Low back pain in general practice: Reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in The Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50: 640–644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mahmud MA, Webster BS, Courtney TK, Matz S, Tacci JA, Christiani DC. Clinical management and the duration of disability for work-related low back pain. J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 1178–1187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bishop PB, Wing PC. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines in family physicians managing worker's compensation board patients with acute lower back pain. Spine J 2003; 3: 442–450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Di Iorio D, Henley E, Doughty A. A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 1015–1021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458–1465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hopayian K, Mugford M. Conflicting conclusions from two systematic reviews of epidural steroid injections for sciatica: Which evidence should general practitioners heed? Br J Gen Pract 1999; 49: 57–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Tulder MW, Tuut M, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Assendelft WJ. Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: E357–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R. The back pain beliefs of health care providers: Are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 223–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shye D, Freeborn DK, Romeo J, Eraker S. Understanding physicians' imaging test use in low back pain care: The role of focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10: 83–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Benbadis SR, Herrera M, Orazi U. Does the neurologist contribute to the care of patients with chronic back pain? Eur Neurol 2002; 48: 61–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Verbeek J, Sengers MJ, Riemens L, Haafkens J. Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Spine 2004; 29: 2309–2318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Abenhaim L, Rossignol M, Gobeille D, Bonvalot Y, Fines P, Scott S. The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries. Spine 1995; 20: 791–795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Deyo RA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Terrific test or tar baby? N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 115–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Deyo RA, Diehl AK. Patient satisfaction with medical care for low-back pain. Spine 1986; 11: 28–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sullivan MJ, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, Keefe F, Martin M, Bradley LA, Lefebvre JC. Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 2001; 17: 52–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Coia P, Morley S. Medical reassurance and patients' responses. J Psychosom Res 1998; 45: 377–386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shrey DE. Worksite disability management and industrial rehabilitation: An overview. In: Shrey DE and Lacerte M, ed. Principles and practices of disability management in industry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997, pp. 3–53.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Amick BC, Habeck RV, Hunt A, Fossel AH, Chapin A, Keller RB, Katz JN. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehabil 2000; 10: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Baril R, Berthelette D, Massicotte P. Early return to work of injured workers: Multidimensional patterns of individual and organizational factors. Saf Sci 2003; 41: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13: 11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lippel K. Therapeutic and anti-therapeutic consequences of workers' compensation. Int J Law Psychiatr 1999; 22: 521–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, Bero L, Bonair A, Cochet C, Freemantle N, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, Levi R, Marshall D, Oxman A, Pasart L, Raisanen V, Rius E, Espinas JA. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 220–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E. Cost, controversy, crisis: Low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 1991; 12: 141–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A systematic approach, 7th edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2004.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Durand M-J, Vachon B, Loisel P, Berthelette D. Constructing the program impact theory for an evidence-based work rehabilitation program for workers with low back pain. Work 2003; 21: 233–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Main CJ. Concepts of treatment and prevention in musculoskeletal disorders. In: Linton SJ, ed. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Armsterdam, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 47–63.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Durand M-J, Loisel P, Hong QN, Charpentier N. Helping clinicians in Work Disability Prevention: The Work Disability Diagnosis Interview. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 12: 191–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shaw WS, Feuerstein M, Miller VI, Wood PM. Identifying barriers to recovery from work related upper extremity disorders. AAOHN J 2003; 51: 337–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hazard RG, Haugh LD, Reid S, Preble JB, MacDonald L. Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury. Spine 1996; 21: 945–951.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Stock S, Baril R, Dion-Hubert C, Lapointe C, Paquette S, Sauvage J, Simoneau S, Vaillancourt C. Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Guide and Tools for Modified Work. Direction de santé publique. Montréal: Agence de développement des réseaux locaux de services de santé et de services sociaux de Montréal, 2005.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain - New Evidence gives new hope – If we can just get all the players onside. Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158: 1625–1631.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jeannot JG, Scherer F, Pittet V, Burnand B, Vader JP. Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: A feasibility study. J Med Int Res 2003; 5: e12.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Buhrman M, Faltenhag S, Strom L, Andersson G. Controlled trial of internet-based treatment with telephone support for chronic back pain. Pain 2004; 111: 368–377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lorig KR, Laurent DD, Deyo RA, Marnell ME, Minor MA, Ritter PL. Can a back pain e-mail discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs?: A randomized study. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 792–796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    O'Shea SF, Hendersen D, Nachemson AL, Linton SJ, Nordin M, Theorell T, Hugar EG, Westin-Miller M. e-Triage, right employee, right care, right time, 2000. http://www.e-triage.com/index.html.
  74. 74.
    Loisel P, Côté P, Durand M-J, Franche RL, Sullivan MJL, all other mentors. Training the next generation of researchers in work disability prevention: The Canadian Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program. J Occup Rehabil 2005; 15: 273–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Scheel IB. The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients. A cluster-randomised trial, In Faculty of Medicine. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2004.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, Oxman AD. A call for action. A randomised controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain. Spine 2002; 27: 561–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Keller RB, Wennberg DE, Soule DN. Changing physician behavior: The Maine Medical Assessment Foundation. Qual Manage Health Care 1997; 5: 1–11.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Keller RB, Chapin AM, Soule DN. Informed inquiry into practice variations: The Maine Medical Assessment Foundation. Qual Assur Health Care 1990; 2: 69–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD. The unbearable lightness of healthcare policy making: A description of a process to give it some weight. J Epidemiol Commun Health 2003; 57: 483–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM, Deluca F, Jones F, Zeide MS, Rothman RH. Acute low-back pain. An objective analysis of conservative therapy. Spine 1980; 5: 324–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson L, Fordyce WE, Nachemson AL. The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: A randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 279–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Staal JB, Hlobil H, Twisk JW, Smid T, Koke AJ, van Mechelen W. Graded activity for low back pain in occupational health care: A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, Heinrichs ML, Koskenniemi L, Kuosma E, Lappi S, Paloheimo R, Servo C, Vaaranen V, Hernberg S. The treatment of acute low back pain—bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 351–355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N. Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine 1999; 24: 2484–2491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Anema JR, Low back pain, workplace intervention and return-to-work. Dissertation thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije University, 2004.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Steenstra I, Back pain management in Dutch occupational health care. Dissertation thesis. Amsterdam, Vrije University, 2004.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vezina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Lariviere C, Tremblay C. Disability prevention—new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2001; 9: 351–360.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Loisel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rachelle Buchbinder
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rowland Hazard
    • 4
  • Robert Keller
    • 5
  • Inger Scheel
    • 6
  • Maurits van Tulder
    • 7
    • 8
  • Barbara Webster
    • 9
  1. 1.Disability Prevention Research and Training CenterUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  2. 2.Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Cabrini HospitalMalvern VictoriaAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Departments of Orthopaedics and MedicineDartmouth Medical SchoolLebanonUSA
  5. 5.Maine Medical Assessment FoundationAugustaUSA
  6. 6.The Norwegian Back Pain NetworkUllevål University HospitalOsloNorway
  7. 7.Institute for Research in Extramural MedicineVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Institute for Health SciencesFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  9. 9.Liberty Mutual Research Institute for SafetyCenter for Disability ResearchHopkintonUSA

Personalised recommendations