Advertisement

Effect of Liquefied Lignin Content on Synthesis of Bio-based Polyurethane Foam for Oil Adsorption Application

  • Raziyeh Mohammadpour
  • Gity Mir Mohamad SadeghiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The present study focused on synthesizing polyurethane foams with different contents of liquefied lignin. To fulfill that, the weight ratios of liquefied lignin to polypropylene glycol triol (PPG as chain extender) were altered from 25 to 100%. The lignin based polyurethane foams (LPUFs) were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and compression strength test. The experimental results revealed that LPUFs structures became more disorganized and their density diminished while their heat stability increased with increasing lignin polyol content. Moreover, the specific compressive properties of LPUFs grew from 1.35 to 35.23 kPa Kg−1 m3 and their glass transition temperature elevated from 38.5 to 90 °C with an increase in lignin polyol due to the three-dimensional lignin structure. Finally, the oil adsorption behavior of LPUFs was studied with Langmuir, Freundlich and Redlich–Peterson isotherms. It was observed that oil adsorption properties enhanced for LPUFs with higher contents of lignin polyol. The current work demonstrated that lignin polyol in polyurethane formulation even up to high concentrations, can be appropriately used in the production of soft and rigid bio based foams for different applications such as bio-friendly oil absorbent.

Keywords

Microwave liquefaction Lignin polyols Polyurethane foam Oil adsorption 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mahmood N, Yuan Z, Schmidt J, Xu C (2016) Review: Depolymerization of lignins and their applications for the preparation of polyols and rigid polyurethane foams. J Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:317–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashida K (2007) Polyurethane and related foams: chemistry and technology. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu J, Jiang J, Hse CY, Shupe TF (2014) Preparation of polyurethane foams using fractionated products in liquefied wood. J Appl Polym Sci 131:40096–40103.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Souza J, Yan N (2013) Producing bark-based polyols through liquefaction: effect of liquefaction temperature. J ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:534–540.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400013e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Faris AH, Ibrahim MNM, Rahim AA, Hussin MH, Brosse N (2015) Preparation and characterization of lignin polyols from the residues of oil palm empty fruit bunch. Bio resources 10:7339–7352Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amaral JS, Sepúlveda M, Cateto CA, Fernandes IP, Rodrigues AE, Belgacem MN, Barreiro MF (2012) Fungal degradation of lignin-based rigid polyurethane foams. J Polym Degrad Stabil 97:2069–2076.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cinelli P, Anguillesi I, Lazzeri A (2013) Green synthesis of flexible polyurethane foams from liquefied lignin. Eur Polym J 49:1174–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keshavarz A, Zilouei H, Abdolmaleki A, Asadinezhad A (2015) Enhancing oil removal from water by immobilizing multi-wall carbon nanotubes on the surface of polyurethane foam. J Environ Manag 157:279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li J, Wang B, Chen K, Tian X, Zeng J, Xu J, Gao W (2017) The use of lignin as cross-linker for polyurethane foam for potential application in adsorbing materials. BioResources 12:8653–8671.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.4.8653-8671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yona AMC, Budija F, Kricej B, Kutnar A, Pavlic M, Pori P, Tavzes C, Petric M (2014) Production of biomaterials from cork: liquefaction in polyhydric alcohols at moderate temperatures. Ind Crops Prod 54:296–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mathews SL, Pawlak J, Grunden AM (2015) Bacterial biodegradation and bioconversion of industrial lignocellulosic streams. J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2939–2954.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6471-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shruti SA, Malik DK (2015) Lignocellulose biomass degradation by microbial consortium isolated from harvested rice field. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4:274–280Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ng SW, Lee CS, Chuah CH, Cheng SF (2017) Preparation and modification of water-blown porous biodegradable polyurethane foams with palm oil-based polyester polyol. Ind Crops Prod 97:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adnan S, Ismail T, Noor N, Din N, Hanzah N, Kian Y, Hassan H (2016) Development of flexible polyurethane nanostructured biocomposite foams derived from palm olein-based polyols. Adv Mater Sci Eng 4316424:12.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4316424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oprea S, Potolinca VO, Gradinariu P, Joga A, Oprea V (2016) Synthesis, properties, and fungal degradation of castor-oil based polyurethane composites with different cellulose contents. Cellulose 23:2515–2526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0972-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hassan EBM, Shukry N (2008) Polyhydric alcohol liquefaction of some lignocellulosic agricultural residues. Ind Crop Prod 27:33–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang H, Chen HZ (2007) A novel method of utilizing the biomass resource: rapid liquefaction of wheat straw and preparation of biodegradable polyurethane foam (PUF). J Chin Inst Chem Eng 38:95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcice.2006.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dsouza J, Camargo R, Yan N (2017) Biomass liquefaction and alkoxylation: a review of structural characterization methods for bio-based polyols. Polym Rev 57:668–694.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2017.1283328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xue BL, Wen JL, Sun RC (2015) Producing lignin-based polyols through microwave-assisted liquefaction for rigid polyurethane foam production. Materials 8:586–599.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8020586 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Griffini G, Passoni V, Suriano R, Levi M, Turri S (2015) Polyurethane coatings based on chemically unmodified fractionated lignin. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:1145–1154.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bernardini J, Cinelli P, Anguillesi I, Coltelli MB, Lazzeri A (2015) Flexible polyurethane foams green production employing lignin or oxypropylated lignin. Eur Polym J 64:147–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahmood N, Yuan Z, Schmidt J, Xu C (2013) Production of polyols via direct hydrolysis of kraft lignin: effect of process parameters. Bioresour Technol 139:13–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.199 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xue BL, Wen JL, Sun RC (2014) Lignin-based rigid polyurethane foam reinforced with pulp fiber: synthesis and characterization. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:1474–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1021/sc5001226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Habashi R, Abdollahi M (2017) Functional groups and structural characterization of unmodified and functionalized lignin by titration, elemental analysis, 1H NMR and FTIR techniques. Iran J Polym Sci Technol 30:405–418.  https://doi.org/10.22063/JIPST.2017.1515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Serrano L, Esakkimuthu E, Marlin N, Brochier-Salon M, Mortha G, Bertaud F (2018) Fast, easy, and economical quantification of lignin phenolic hydroxyl groups: comparison with classical techniques. Energy Fuels 32:5969–5977.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keshavarz A, Zilouei H, Abdolmaleki A, Asadinezhad A, Nikkhah AA (2016) Impregnation of polyurethane foam with activated carbon for enhancing oil removal from water. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:699–710.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0908-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crini G, Badot PM (2008) Application of chitosan, a natural aminopolysaccharide, for dye removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption processes using batch studies: a review of recent literature. Prog Polym Sci 33:399–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghosal PS, Gupta AK (2017) Determination of thermodynamic parameters from Langmuir isotherm constant-revisited. J Mol Liq 225:137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nikkhah AA, Zilouei H, Asadinezhad A, Keshavarz A (2015) Removal of oil from water using polyurethane foam modified with nanoclay. Chem Eng J 262:278–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu FC, Liu BL, Wu KT, Tseng RL (2010) A new linear form analysis of Redlich-Peterson isotherm equation for the adsorptions of dyes. Chem Eng J 162:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Santos OSH, Silva MCd, Silva VR, Mussel WN, Yoshida MI (2017) Polyurethane foam impregnated with lignin as a filler for the removal of crude oil from contaminated water. J Hazard Mater 324:406–413.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kang SM, Lee SJ, Kim BK (2012) Shape memory polyurethane foams. Express Polym Lett 6:63–69.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Członka S, Bertinob MF, Strzeleca K, Strąkowskaa A, Masłowskia M (2018) Rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with solid waste generated in leather industry. Polym Test 69:225–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garrett JT, Xu R, Cho J, Runt J (2003) Phase separation of diamine chain-extended poly(urethane) copolymers: FTIR spectroscopy and phase transitions. Polymer 44:2711–2719.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00165-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ning L, Dning W, Kang Y (1997) Hydrogen-bonding properties of segmented polyether poly(urethane urea) copolymer. Macromolecules 30:4405–4409.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma951386e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yue D, Oribayo O, Rempel GL, Pan Q (2017) Liquefaction of waste pine wood and its application in the synthesis of a flame retardant polyurethane foam. RSC Adv 7:30334–30344.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra03546b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ertem SP, Yilgor E, Kosak C, Wilkes GL, Zhang M, Yilgor I (2012) Effect of soft segment molecular weight on tensile properties of poly(propylene oxide) based polyurethaneureas. Polymer 53:4614–4622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang S, Liu W, Yang D, Qiu X (2019) Highly resilient lignin-containing polyurethane foam. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:496–504.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b05072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bernardini J, Anguillesi I, Coltelli MB, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A (2015) Optimizing the lignin based synthesisof flexible polyurethane foams employing reactive liquefying agents. Polym Int 64:1235–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Suait MS, Ahmad A, Badri KH, Mohamed NS, Rahman MYA, Ricardo CLA, Scardi P (2014) The potential of polyurethane bio-based solid polymer electrolyte for photoelectrochemical cell application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:3005–3017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ayres E, Vasconcelos WL, Oréfice RL (2007) Attachment of inorganic moieties onto aliphatic polyurethanes. Mat Res 10:119–125.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392007000200005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Komalan C, George KE, Kumar PAS, Varughese KTS, Thomas S (2007) Dynamic mechanical analysis of binary and ternary polymer blends based on nylon copolymer/EPDM rubber and EPM grafted maleic anhydride compatibilizer. Express Polym Lett 1:641–653.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hassan MK, Tucker SJ, Abukmail A, Wiggins JS, Mauritz KA (2016) Polymer chain dynamics in epoxy based composites as investigated by broadband dielectric spectroscopy. Arab J Chem 9:305–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Verdolotti L, Lavorgna M, Lamanna R, Di Maio E, Iannace S (2015) Polyurethane-silica hybrid foam by solegel approach: chemical and functional properties. Polymer 56:20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kattiyaboota T, Thongpina C (2016) Effect of natural oil based polyols on the properties of flexible polyurethane foams blown by distilled water. Energy Procedia 89:177–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Onder OC, Yilgor E, Yilgor I (2018) Preparation of monolithic polycaprolactone foams with controlled morphology. Polymer 136:166–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.12.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Duong HTT, Burford RP (2006) Effect of foam density, oil viscosity, and temperature on oil sorption behavior of polyurethane. J Appl Polym Sci 99:360–367.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pandey A, Bera D, Shukla A, Ray L (2007) Potential of agarose for biosorption of Cu(II) in aqueous system. Am J Biochem Biotechnol 3:55–59.  https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2007.55.59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Haghseresht F, Lu GQ (1998) Adsorption characteristics of phenolic compounds onto coal-reject-derived adsorbents. Energy Fuels 12:1100–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9801165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hasany SM, Saeed MM, Ahmed M (2002) Sorption and thermodynamic behavior of zinc(II)–thiocyanate complexes onto polyurethane foam from acidic solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 252:477–484.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015890317697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ogunmodede OT, Ojo AA, Adewole E, Adebayo OL (2015) Adsorptive removal of anionic dye from aqueous solutions by mixture of Kaolin and Bentonite clay: characteristics, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Iran J Energy Environ 6:147–153.  https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijee.2015.06.02.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Polymer Engineering and Color TechnologyAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations