Advertisement

Analysis of Hybrid Sorubim Protein Films Incorporated with Glycerol and Clove Essential Oil for Packaging Applications

  • Rosiane de Souza Silva
  • Barbara Matias Moreira Santos
  • Gustavo Graciano FonsecaEmail author
  • Carlos Prentice
  • William Renzo Cortez-Vega
Original Paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The indiscriminate disposal and the accumulation of non-biodegradable packaging have been causing serious environmental problems. One of the alternatives is the use of biodegradable films. Proteins are among the natural biopolymers most used to produce biofilms. This study aimed to produce and characterize biofilms obtained from hybrid sorubim (Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum × Pseudoplatystoma corruscans) protein isolate (HSPI) incorporated with glycerol (G) and clove essential oil (CEO). The HSPI was obtained by the pH shift method, using as raw material the mechanically separated meat of hybrid sorubim. The films presented different properties depending on the concentrations of the studied variables. In general, the film with the best characteristics was the treatment 6 (25% G, 2.5 g HSPI and 0.5 g CEO). Due to the low concentration of CEO used, the films were not able to efficiently inhibit microbial activity.

Graphic Abstract

Keywords

Polymers Fish protein isolate Essential oil 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Brazilian research funding agencies CNPq, CAPES and FUNDECT for the financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Mostafa NA, Farag AA, Abo-dief Hala M, Tayeb AM (2018) Production of biodegradable plastic from agricultural wastes. Arab J Chem 11:546–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rhim JW, Ng PKW (2007) Natural biopolymer-based nanocomposite films for packaging applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 47:411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoque S, Benjakul S, Prodpran T (2010) Effect of heat treatment of film-forming solution on the properties of film from cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) skin gelatin. J Food Eng 96:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zavareze ER, El Halal SLM, Telles AC, Prentice C (2012) Biodegradable films based on myofibrillar proteins of fish. Braz J Food Technol IV SSA:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rocha M, Loiko MR, Tondo EC, Prentice C (2014) Physical, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of Argentine anchovy (Engraulis anchoita) protein films incorporated with organic acids. Food Hydrocoll 37:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rocha M, Prietto L, Souza MM, Furlong EB, Prentice C (2018) Effect of organic acids on physical-mechanical and antifungicidal properties of anchovy protein films. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 27:316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paiva LB, Morales AR, Guimarães TR (2006) Mechanical properties of polypropylene and organophilic montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polím – Ciênc Tecnol 16:136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ojagh SM, Rezaei M, Razavi SH, Hosseini SMH (2010) Development and evaluation of a novel biodegradable film made from chitosan and cinnamon essential oil with low affinity toward water. Food Chem 122:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cavenaghi-Altemio AD, Hashinokuti AA, Albuquerque DM, Fonseca GG (2018) Transglutaminase addition increases quality and acceptation of sausages obtained from mechanically separated meat of hybrid sorubins. Emir J Food Agric 30:952–958Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silva RS, Santos BMM, Pizato S, Fonseca GG, Cortez-Vega WR (2018) Evaluation of protein isolate obtained from byproducts of hybrid sorubim (Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum x Pseudoplatystoma corruscans). J. Bioener Food Sci 5:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ardakani KM, Navarchian AH, Sadegui F (2010) Optimization of mechanical propertiens of thermoplastic starch/clay nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 79:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrade CS, Fonseca GG, Innocentini-Mei LH, Fakhouri FM (2017) Development and characterization of multilayer films based on polyhydroxyalkanoates and hydrocolloids. J Appl Polym Sci 134:44458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romani VP, Olsen B, Collares MP, Oliveira JRM, Prentice-Hernández C, Martins VG (2019) Improvement of fish protein films properties for food packaging through glow discharge plasma application. Food Hydrocoll 87:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gontard N, Duchez C, Cuq J, Guilbert S (1994) Edible composite films of wheat gluten and lipids. Water vapor permeability and other physical properties. Int J Food Sci Technol 29:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM (2000) American Society for Testing and Material, ASTM E96–00: Standard test method for water vapor transmission of materials. ASTM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pimentel T, Pizzuti L, Fakhouri FM, Innocentini-Mei LH, Fonseca GG (2018) Development of multilayer films obtained from epoxidized methyl esters, polyhydroxyalkanoates and their combinations. J Polym Environ 26:1661–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gennadios A, McHugh TH, Weller CL, Krochta JM (1994) Edible coatings and films for processed foods. In: Krochta JM, Baldwin EA, Nisperos-Carriedo M (eds) Edible coatings and films to improve food quality. Technomic Publishing Co Inc, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM (1980) American Society for Testing and Material, ASTM D 882–83: Standard test methods for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. ASTM, ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanada-Palmu PS, Hélen H, Hyvönen L (2000) Preparation, properties and applications of wheat gluten edible films. J Agric Food Sci 9:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    NCCLS (2003) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests Approved standard, 8th ed NCCLS document M2-A8. NCCLS, WayneGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    De Santis F, Pantani R (2013) Optical properties of polypropylene upon recycling. Sci World J.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/354093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferreira FA (2014) Antimicrobial nanocomposites films obtained from fish proteins and nanoclay incorporated with essential oils. Dissertation. Federal University of Rio Grande: Rio Grande, Brazil, p 105Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    El Halal SLM, Zavareze ER, Rocha M, Pinto VZ, Nunes MR, Luvielmo MM, Prentice C (2016) Films based on protein isolated from croaker (Micropogonias furnieri) and palm oil. J Sci Food Agric 96:2478–2485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourtoom T, Chinnan MS, Jantawat P, Sanguandeekul R (2006) Effect of plasticizer type and concentration on the properties of edible film from water-soluble fish proteins in surimi wash-water. Food Sci Technol Int 12:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perez-Gago MB, Krochta JM (2001) Denaturation time and temperature effects on solubility, tensile properties, and oxygen permeability of whey protein edible films. J Food Sci 66:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cuq B, Gontard N, Guilbert S (1998) Proteins as agricultural polymers for packaging production. Cereal Chem 75:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guerrero P, Stefani PM, Ruseckaite RA, de la Caba K (2011) Functional properties of films based on soy protein isolate and gelatin processes by compression molding. J Food Eng 105:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tanada-Palmu PS, Grosso CRF (2002) Edible wheat gluten films: development, mechanical and barrier properties and application to strawberries (Fragaria ananassa). Bol Cent Pesq Process Alim 20:291–308Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adamu AD, Jikan SS, Talip BHA, Badarulzaman NA, Yahaya S (2017) Effect of glycerol on the properties of tapioca starch film. Mat Sci Forum 888:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paschoalick TM, Garcia FT, Sobral PJA, Habitante AMQB (2003) Characterization of some functional properties of edible films based on muscle proteins of Nile tilapia. Food Hydrocoll 17:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chirita M (2008) Mechanical properties of collagen biomimetic films formed in the presence of calcium, silica and chitosan. J Bionic Eng 5:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gacula MC, Singh J (1984) Statistical methods in food and consumer research. Academic Press Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nakashima AY, Chevalier RC, Cortez-Vega WR (2016) Development and characterization of collagen films with added essential oil of clove India. J Bioener Food Sci 3:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oliveira SPLF, Bertan LC, De Rensis CMVB, Bilck AP, Vianna PCB (2017) Whey protein-based films incorporated with oregano essential oil. Polím—Ciênc Tecnol 27:158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang L, Auty MAE, Rau A, Kerry JF, Kerry JP (2009) Effect of pH and addition of corn oil on the properties of gelatin- based biopolymer films. J Food Eng 90:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mali S, Grossmann MVE, Garcia MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE (2006) Effects of controlled storage on thermal, mechanical and barrier properties of plasticized films from different starch sources. J Food Eng 75:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pattabi M, Amma BS, Manzoor K (2007) Photoluminescence study of PVP capped CdS nanoparticles embedded in PVA matrix. Mat Res Bull 42:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Lima MSD, Carvalho DS, Malta SHS, Vinhas CVF, GM. (2007) Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of clove essential oil on polyvinyl chloride films. Rev Bras Agrotecnol 7:294–298Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Menezes BS, Cortez-Vega WR, Prentice C (2017) Nanocomposites films obtained from protein isolates of mechanically deboned chicken meat added with montmorillonite. Polím—Ciênc Tecnol 27:75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Bioengineering, Faculty of Biological and Environmental SciencesFederal University of Grande DouradosDouradosBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratory of Food Technology, School of Food and ChemistryFederal University of Rio GrandeRio GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations