The Flotation by Selected Depressants as an Efficient Technique for Separation of a Mixed Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, Polycarbonate and Polyoxymethyleneplastics in Waste Streams
- 7 Downloads
The virgin acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC) and polyoxy methylene (POM) available in a plastic mix were separated from each other by a flotation technique with the aid of several depressants. Also, a Design-Expert® statistical software was used to predict plastics flotation using input data including conditioning time, flotation tank temperature and pH and depressants concentration. It revealed that the flotation technique was effective for separation of studied plastics by selected depressants. Understanding the adsorption–desorption phenomena and effective parameters on this process was crucial to explain the activity and selectivity of a depressant on a plastic surface. The increasing conditioning time up to 15 min had adverse effect on the floatability of the all studied plastics conditioned with tannic acid (TA). TA and methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) had not any effect on floatability of PC and POM in all studied depressant concentrations. The flotation of ABS reached to 85% for flotation tank pH of 6.5 with 15 min depressant conditioning at 35 °C as flotation tank temperature. A complicate phenomenon involved and predominated in flotation of studied plastics. Proposed equations by Design-Expert® predicted close plastic flotation values when compared with corresponding experimental values.
KeywordsDepressant Engineering plastic Flotation Plastics mix Recycling
The authors sincerely thank the staffs of the AKAM company laboratory located in MarkazRoshd, the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad for their sincere cooperation. Approval no. 3/45811.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have not any financial/commercial conflicts of interest.
- 14.Deiringer G, Edelmann G, Rauxloh B (1993) U.S.Patent 5248041Google Scholar
- 16.Izumi S, Tanaka H (1975) Method for separation of mixture of plastics, USGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yuce AE, Kilic M (2015) separation of PVC/PET mixture from plastic wastes using column flotation technique. J Environ Prot Ecol 16:705–715Google Scholar
- 26.Beckman EJ (1992) Separation of physically co-mingled plastics using a supercritical fluid to facilitate recycling, USGoogle Scholar
- 31.Qureshi A, Shah S, Pelagade S, Singh NL, Mukherjee Tripathi SA, Shripathi UPDA (2010) Surface modification of polycarbonate by plasma treatment. J Phys 208:1–6Google Scholar
- 36.Nagy M, Skvarla J, Sisol M (2011) A possibility of using the flotation process to separate plastics. Ann Fac Eng Hunedoara 9:275Google Scholar
- 37.Mallampati SR, HoLee B, Mitoma Y, Simion C (2017) Heterogeneous nano-Fe/Ca/CaO catalytic ozonation for selective surface hydrophilization of plastics containing brominated and chlorinated flame retardants (B/CFRs): separation from automobile shredder residue by froth flotation. Environ Sci Pollut R 24:4469–4479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Mallampati R, Lee C, Thanh Truc NT, Lee B (2015) Hazardous PVC plastics separation from ASR by froth flotation after microwave assisted surface modification. Int Conf Adv Environ Res 87:680–749Google Scholar
- 41.IAPD Education Committee. “Amorphous and Semi-Crystalline Engineering Thermoplastics, Module 4”. Basic Plastics Education tutorials. International Association of Plastics Distributors. Archived from the original on 2 March 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2012Google Scholar
- 42.Stat-Ease Handbook for Experimenters, Copyright © (2018) Stat-Ease, Inc. 2021 East Hennepin Ave, Suite 480 Minneapolis, MN 55413Google Scholar
- 46.Gregg GC, Sing KSW (1982) Adsorption, surface area and porosity, 2nd edn. Academic press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 47.Masel IR (1996) Principles of adsorption and reaction on solid surfaces. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 52.Montgomery DC (2013) Design and analysis of experiments, 8th edn. Wiley, DanversGoogle Scholar