Advertisement

Preparation of Low-Density Microcellular Foams from Recycled PET Modified by Solid State Polymerization and Chain Extension

  • Katalin Bocz
  • Béla Molnár
  • György Marosi
  • Ferenc Ronkay
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Recycled polyethylene-terephthalate (RPET) bottle regrinds were physically foamed after two types of industrially feasible molecular weight increasing processes. Intrinsic viscosity (IV) of initial waste (0.71 dL/g) increased both after reactive extrusion carried out using a multifunctional epoxy-based chain extender (0.74 dL/g) and after solid state polycondensation (SSP) (0.78 dL/g), while capillary rheometry revealed higher degree of branching in the chain extended PET material. Despite the relatively low IV values (below 0.80 dL/g), physical foaming, a mild and cost-efficient way, was successful in both cases, uniform microcellular foam structures with void fractions ranging between 75 and 83% were achieved. During the experiments morphology change in the materials was tracked by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) besides recording IV values. The IV drop during foaming was between 0.03 and 0.10 depending on the pre-processing technology. Structure of foams produced from the two different modified RPET materials was compared with each other based on scanning electron microscopic imaging of cryogenic fracture surfaces. The average cell diameters were measured to be 213 and 360 µm in the case of chain extended and SSP-modified materials, respectively.

Keywords

Recycling PET Physical foaming Chain extension, solid state polycondensation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was realized in the framework of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/1-11-1-2012-0001 “National Excellence Program - Elaborating and operating an inland student and researcher personal support system”. The project was subsidized by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund. The research was financially supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K112644, PD121171 and FK 128352) and by the ÚNKP-18-4-BME-138 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities. The project was funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary in the frame of NVKP 16-1-2016-0012, GINOP-2.2.1-15-2016-00015 and FIEK_16-1-2016-0007 projects. Support of grant BME FIKP-VÍZ by EMMI is kindly acknowledged. K. Bocz is thankful for the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang H, Wen Z-G (2014) The consumption and recycling collection system of PET bottles: a case study of Beijing, China. Waste Manag 34:987–998.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartolome L, Imran M, Cho Bong G, Al-Masry WA, Kim DH (2002) Recent developments in the chemical recycling of PET. In: Achilias D (ed) Material recycling—trends and perspectives. Intech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shena L, Worrell E, Pate MK (2010) Open-loop recycling: Aa LCA case study of PET bottle-to fibre recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:34–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Welle F (2011) Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling—an overview. Conserv Recycl 55:865–875.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dobrovszky K, Ronkay F (2014) Alternative polymer separation technology by centrifugal force in a melted state. Waste Manag 34:2104–2112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dobrovszky K (2018) Temperature dependent separation of immiscible polymer blend in a melted state. Waste Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Awaja F, Pavel D (2005) Recycling of PET. Eur Polym J 41:1453–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xanthos M, Dhavalikar R, Tan V, Dey SK, Yilmazer U (2001) Properties and applications of sandwich panels based on PET foams. J Reinf Plast Compos 20:786–793.  https://doi.org/10.1106/38PA-R6GR-YLK5-JH3M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhong H, Xi Z, Liu T, Zhao L (2013) In-situ polymerization-modification process and foaming of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Chin J Chem Eng 21:1410–1418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(13)60543-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Japon S, Boogh L, Leterrier Y, Manson J-A (2000) Reactive processing of poly(ethylene terephthalate) modified with multifunctional epoxy-based additives. Polymer 41:5809–5818.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00768-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ronkay F, Molnár B, Dogossy G (2017) The effect of mold temperature on chemical foaming of injection molded recycled polyethylene-terephthalate. Thermochim Acta 651:65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ronkay F, Molnár B (2017) Time dependence of morphology and mechanical properties of injection molded recycled PET. Int Polym Process 32:203–208.  https://doi.org/10.3139/217.3307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szabó V, Dogossy G (2017) Recycling of mineral water bottles with chemical foaming. Acta Tech Jaurinensis 10:157–167.  https://doi.org/10.14513/actatechjaur.v10.n2.446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xanthos M, Young M-W, Karayanndis GP, Bikiaris DN (2001) Reactive modification of polyethylene terephthalate with polyepoxides. Polym Eng Sci 41:643–655.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Awaja F, Daver F, Kosior E (2004) Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) chain extension by a reactive extrusion process. Polym Eng Sci 44:1579–1587.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu B, Xu Q (2013) Effects of bifunctional chain extender on the crystallinity and thermal stability of PET. J Mater Sci Chem Eng 1:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.4236/msce.2013.16002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang K, Qian J, Lou F, Yan W, Wu G, Guo W (2017) The effects of two-step reactive processing on the properties of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polym Bull 74:2479–2496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1850-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao L, Wang H, Qian Q, Jiang X, Liu X, Huang B, Chen Q (2012) Molecular and structural analysis of epoxide-modified recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) from rheological data. Polym Eng Sci 52:2127–2133.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.23175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Göltner W (2003) Solid-state polycondensation of polyester resins: fundamentals and industrial production. In: Scheirs J, Long TE (eds) Modern polyesters: chemistry and technology of polyesters and copolyesters. Wiley, Chichester, pp 195–239Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karayannidis GP, Kokkalas DE, Bikiaris DN (1993) Solid-state polycondensation of poly(thylene Terephthalate) recycled from postconsumer soft-drink bottles. I. J Appl Polym Sci 50:2135–2142.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1993.070501213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karayannidis GP, Kokkalas DE, Bikiaris DN (1995) Solid-state polycondensation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) recycled from postconsumer soft-drink bottles. II. J Appl Polym Sci 56:405–410.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1995.070560311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhong H, Xi Z, Liu T, Xu Z, Zhao L (2013) Integrated process of supercritical CO2-assisted melt polycondensation modification and foaming of poly(ethylene terephthalate). J Supercrit Fluids 74:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2012.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Michaeli W, Kropp D, Heinz R, Schumacher H (2008) Foam extrusion using carbon dioxide as a blowing agent. In: Lee S, Scholz KD, Lee S (eds) Polymeric foams. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xia T, Xi Z, Yi X, Liu T, Zhao L (2015) Melt foamability of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/ clay nanocomposites prepared by extrusion blending in the presence of pyromellitic dianhydride. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:6922–6931.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu H, Wang X, Liu W, Liu B, Zhou H (2014) Reactive modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and its foaming behavior. Cell Polym 33:189–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li J, Tang S, Wu Z, Zheng A, Guan Y, Wei D (2017) Branching and cross-linking of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and its foaming properties. Polym Sci Ser B 59:164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560090417020051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coccorullo I, Di Maio L, Montesano S, Incarnato L (2009) Theoretical and experimental study of foaming process with chain extended recycled PET. Express Polym Lett 3:84–96.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xanthos M, Yilmazer U, Quintans J (2000) Melt viscoelasticity of polyethylene terephthalate resins for low density extrusion foaming. Polym Eng Sci 40:554–566.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xanthos M, Wan C, Dhavalikar R, Karayannidis GP, Bikiaris DN (2004) Identification of rheological and structural characteristics of foamable poly(ethylene terephthalate) by reactive extrusion. Polym Int 53:1161–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jiang XL, Luo SJ, Sun K, Chen XD (2007) Effect of nucleating agents on crystallization kinetics of PET. Express Polym Lett 1:245–251.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bocz K, Tábi T, Vadas D, Sauceau M, Fages J, Marosi G (2016) Characterisation of natural fibre reinforced PLA foams prepared by supercritical CO2 assisted extrusion. Express Polym Lett 10:771–779.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vassiliou AA, Chrissafis K, Bikiaris DN (2010) In situ prepared PET nanocomposites: effect of organically modified montmorillonite and fumed silica nanoparticles on PET physical properties and thermal degradation kinetics. Thermochim Acta 500:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2009.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vadas D, Igricz T, Sarazin J, Bourbigot S, Marosi G, Bocz K (2018) Flame retardancy of microcellular poly(lactic acid) foams prepared by supercritical CO2-assisted extrusion. Polym Degrad Stab 153:100–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Badia JD, Strömberg E, Karlsson S, Ribes-Greus A (2012) The role of crystalline, mobile amorphous rigid amorphous fractions in the performance of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Polym Degrad Stab 97:98–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Osswald TA, Rudolph N (1978) Polymer rheology fundamentals and application. Hanser Publishers, MunichGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rao MA (2014) Rheology of fluid, semisolid, and solid foods. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xanthos M, Patel A, Dey S, Dagli SS, Jacob C, Nosker TJ, Renfree RW (1994) Compatibilization of refined commingled post-consumer plastics. Adv Polym Technol 13:231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.1994.060130306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Incarnato L, Scarfato P, Di Maio L, Acierno D (2000) Structure and rheology recycled PET modified by reactive extrusion. Polymer 41:6825–6831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00032-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology and BiotechnologyBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Department of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringBudapest University of Technology and EconomicsBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Material Testing LaboratoryImsys Ltd.BudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations