Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 3250–3261 | Cite as

Towards Synthesis, Characterization and Properties of Smart Material Based on Chitosan Using Mn-IV Itaconic Acid as a Novel Redox Pair

  • Kh. M. Mostafa
  • E. Osman
  • R. I. Mahmoud
  • A. A. El-Sanabary
Original Paper

Abstract

The precipitation technique of Mn-IV/itaconic acid redox pair was chosen for grafting meth acrylic acid onto chitosan. This was done to maximize the graft yield and minimize the homopolymer formation to lower extent in addition to prepare water soluble chitosan instead of non-eco friendly acid soluble one. Evidence of grafting was confirmed instrumentally by (FTIR, SEM, and TGA), titrimetrically using carboxyl content and gravimetrically using dry weight method. The mechanism of grafting and factors affected grafting reaction were studied in details, and the optimum reaction conditions were obtained at [chitosan] 2 g, [MnO2] 25.9 mmol/100 g sample, [itaconic acid],100 mmol/L, [MAA] 50% bows,[liquor ratio], 25, reaction time, 2 h, and [reaction temperature], 65 °C. It is also seen from the obtained results that, the resultant copolymer showed the following findings: (a) only nitric acid solutions are proved to be a superior solvent for the grafted product; (b) superabsorbent towards water (197 g H2O/g polymer) and saline absorbency (60 g saline solution/g polymer) after cross-linked with epichlorohydrin, (c) higher water solubility (21%) at 48% graft yield and (d) 73.5% copper ion removal in comparison with 41% for chitosan.

Keywords

Chitosan Grafting Water solubility, super absorbent FTIR SEM TGA 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by National Institute of Standards, NIS, Egypt

References

  1. 1.
    Brine CJ, Sanford PA, Zikakis JP (eds) (1992) Advances in chitin and chitosan. Elsevier Applied Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jayakumara R, Prabaharana M, Reisa RL, Manoa JF (2005) Graft copolymerized chitosan—present status and applications. Carbohyd Polym 62:142–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stevens WF, Rao MS, Chandrkrachang S (eds) (1996) Chitin and chitosan. Asian Institute of Technology, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehsan S, Parisa D, Ahmad AS (2016) A review on chitosan-based adsorptive membranes. Carbohydr Polym 152(5):419–432Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wen JL, Tze DC, Chia -Wen L (2009) Synthesis and characterization of lactobionic acid grafted pre-gylated chitosan and nanoparticle complex application. Polymer 50(17):4166–4174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiankang H, Dichen L, Yaxiong LY, Yao B, Bingheng L, andLian Q (2007) Fabrication and characterization of chitosan/gelatin porous scaffolds with predefined internal microstructures. Polymer 48(15):4578–4588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yinsong W, Qian J, Ling RL, Qiqing Z (2007) The interaction between bovine serum albumin and the self-aggregated nanoparticles of cholesterol-modified O-carboxymethyl chitosan. Polymer 48(14):4135–4142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    David WJ, Samuel MH (2001) Review of vinyl graft copolymerization featuring recent advances toward controlled radical-based reactions and illustrated with chitin/chitosan trunk polymers. Chem Rev 101:3245–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang ZK, Yuan Y (2001) Studies on the synthesis and properties of hydroxyl azacrown ether-grafted chitosan. J Appl Polym Sci 82(8):1838–1843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen S, Wang Y (2001) Study on β-cyclodextrin grafting with chitosan and slow release of its inclusion complex with radioactive iodine. J Appl Polym Sci 82(10):2414–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jung BO, Kim CH, Choi KS, Lee YM, Kim JJ (1999) Preparation of amphiphilic chitosan and their antimicrobial activities. J Appl Polym Sci 72(13):1713–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kotze AF, Lueßen HL, De Leeuw BJ, De Boer AG, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE (1997) N-Trimethyl chitosan chloride as a potential absorption enhancer across mucosal surfaces: in vitro evaluation in intestinal epithelial cells (caco-2). Pharm Res 14(9):1197–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thanou M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE (2001) Oral drug absorption enhancement by chitosan and its derivatives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 52(2):117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huafei X (2011) Study on the preparation of superabsorbent composite of chitosan-g-poly (acrylic acid)/kaolin by in-situ polymerization. Int J Chem 3(3):69–74Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Don TM, King CF, Chiu WY (2002) Synthesis and properties of chitosan-modified poly (vinyl acetate). J Appl Polym Sci 86(12):3057–3063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yinghai L, Rongyue Z, Jianping Z, Weiqi Z, Shengxian L (2006) Graft copolymerization of sodium acrylate onto chitosan via redox polymerization. Iran Polym J 15(12):935–942Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ying-Chien C, Jan - Ying Y, Cheng-Fang T (2011) Antibacterial characteristics and activity of water-soluble chitosan derivatives prepared by the Maillard reaction. Molecules 16:8504–8514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jigar MJ, Vijay KS (2007) Ceric ammonium nitrate induced grafting of polyacrylamide onto carboxymethyl chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 67(3):427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shantha KL, Bala U, Rao KP (1995) Tailor-made chitosans for drug delivery. Eur Polymer J 31(4):377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarhan AA, Monier M, Ayad DM, Badawy DS (2010) Evaluation of the potential of polymeric carriers based on chitosan-grafted-polyacrylonitrile in the formulation of drug delivery systems. J Appl Polym Sci 118(3):1837–1845Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pourjavadi A, Mahdavinia GR, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Omidian H (2003) Modified chitosan I. Optimized cerium ammonium nitrate-induced synthesis of chitosan-graft-polyacrylonitrile. J Appl Polym Sci 88(8):2048–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kurita K (1996) In: Salamone JC (ed) Polymeric materials encyclopedia, vol 2. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 1205–1208Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell G, Wijnberg AC (1995) Standardization of methodology for chemical functions in starch derivatives. Part 1. Starch/Starke 47(2):46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khalil MI, Mostafa KhM, Hebeish A (1993) Graft polymerization of acryl amide onto maize starch using potassium persulfate as initiator. Die Angew Makromol Chem 213(1):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mostafa KhM, Samarkandy AR, El-Sanabary AA (2011) Grafting onto carbohydrate polymer using novel potassium persulfate/tetramethylethylenediamine redox system for initiating grafting. Adv Polym Technol 30(2):138–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mostafa KhM, El-Sanabary AA (2013) Synthesis and characterization of novel smart flocculant based on poly (MAam)-pregelled starch graft copolymers and their degraded products. Adv Polym Technol 32(2):21339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mostafa KhM, Samarkandy AR, El-Sanabary AA (2010) Synthesis and characterization of (poly (N-vinyl formamide)—pregelled starch graft copolymer. J Polym Res 17(6):889–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mostafa KhM, Morsy MS (2004) Modification of carbohydrate polymers via grafting of methacrylonitrile onto pregelled starch using potassium monopersulfate/Fe2+ redox pair. Polym Int 53(7):885–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mostafa KhM, El-Sanabary AA (2012) Harnessing of novel tailored modified pregelled starch derived products in sizing of cotton textiles. Adv Polym Technol 31(1):52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mostafa KhM, Samarkandy AR, El-Sanabary AA (2010) Preparation of poly (DMAEM)-cross linked pregelled starch graft copolymer and its application in waste water treatments. Carbohydr Polym 86:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mostafa KhM, Samarkandy AR, El-Sanabary AA (2010) Removal of basic dyes from aqueous medium using novel poly (MAA)-cross linked pregelled starch graft copolymer. J Appl Polym Sci 118(5):2728–2735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mostafa KhM, Samarkandy AR, El-Sanabary AA (2009) Preparation of poly (MAA)-cross linked pregelled starch graft copolymer and its application in waste water treatments. J Appl Polym Sci 112:2835–2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mostafa KhM, Morsy MS (2004) Tailoring a new sizing agent via structural modification of pregelled starch molecules: Part: 1: carboxymethylation and grafting. Starch/Starke 56(6):254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hebeish A, Bayazeed A, El-Alfy E, Khalil MI (1988) Synthesis of vinyl polymer-starch composites to serve as size base materials. Starch-Stärke 40(5):191–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hebeish A, El-Alfy E, Bayazeed A (1988) Synthesis and properties of polyacrylamide-starch graft copolymers. Starch-Stärke 40(6):223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pengju L, Yuezhen B, Yongqiang L, Ru C, Xuan W, Baoyan Z (2009) Studies on graft copolymerization of chitosan with acrylonitrile by the redox system. Polymer 50:5675–5680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen CC, Vassallo JC, Chatterjee PK (1985) In: Chatterjee PK (ed) Absorbency. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 197Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hashem A, Afifi MA, El-Alfy EA, Hebeish A (2005) Synthesis, characterization and saponification of poly (AN)-starch composites and properties of their hydrogels. Am J Appl Sci 2(3):614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Aghdas H, Habibollah Y, Zahra M, Harri H (2013) Selective adsorption of Pb(II), Cd(II), and Ni(II) ions from aqueous solution using chitosan–MAA nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol 61:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Textile Metrology Laboratory, Chemical Metrology DivisionNational Institute for Standards (NIS)GizaEgypt
  2. 2.Chemical Industries Research Division, Polymers & Pigments DepartmentNational Research CentreCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations