Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 3187–3196 | Cite as

Transfer of Graphene CVD to Surface of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) Films: Effect on Biodegradation Process

  • Luiz F. Maldonado
  • Pablo A. R. Muñoz
  • Guilhermino J. M. Fechine
Original Paper
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

Here, the influence of graphene as a coating on the biodegradation process for two different polymers is investigated, poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) (biodegradable) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) (non-biodegradable). Chemical vapor deposition graphene was transferred to the surface of two types of polymers using the Direct Dry Transfer technique. Polymer films, coated and uncoated with graphene, were buried in a maturated soil for up to 180 days. The films were analyzed before and after exposure to microorganisms in order to obtain information about the integrity of the graphene (Raman Spectroscopy), the biodegradation mechanism of the polymer (molecular weight and loss of weight), and surface changes of the films (atomic force microscopy and contact angle). The results prove that the graphene coating acted as a material to control the biodegradation process the PBAT underwent, while the LDPE covered by graphene only had changes in the surface properties of the film due to the accumulation of solid particles. Polymer films coated with graphene may allow the production of a material that can control the microbiological degradation, opening new possibilities in biodegradable polymer packaging. Regarding the possibility of graphene functionalization, the coating can also be selective for specific microorganisms attached to the surface.

Keywords

Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) Low-density polyethylene CVD graphene Biodegradation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grants 2012/50259-8 and 2014/22840-3. This work was also partially funded by Fundo Mackenzie de Pesquisa (MackPesquisa), grant 068/2014. Pablo A. R. Muñoz are supported by a fellowship from FAPESP (2015/16591-3).

Author Contributions

All authors reviewed, revised, commented on and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3:e1700782.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lebreton LCM, Van Der Zwet J, Damsteeg JW et al (2017) River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat Commun 8:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amass W, Amass A, Tighe B (1998) A review of biodegradable polymers: uses, current developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters, blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studies. Polym Int 47:89–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(1998100)47:2<89::AID-PI86>3.0.CO;2-FGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Almeida D, Peças P, Ribeiro I et al (2011) Application of life cycle engineering for the comparison of biodegradable polymers injection moulding performance. In: Hesselbach J, Herrmann C (eds) Glocalized solutions for sustainability in manufacturing SE-106. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bastioli C (2005) Handbook of biodegradable polymers, 1st edn. Rapra Technology Limited, ShawburyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozsagiroglu E, Guvenihr YA, Iyisan B (2012) Biodegradation and characterization studies of different kinds of polyurethane with several enzyme solutions. Polym J Environ Study 21:1777–1782Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsuji H, Echizen Y, Nishimura Y (2006) Enzymatic degradation of poly(L-lactic acid): effects of UV irradiation. J Polym Environ 14:239–248.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0023-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho K, Lee J, Kwon K (2001) Hydrolytic degradation behavior of poly(butylene succinate)s with different crystalline morphologies. J Appl Polym Sci 79:1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20010207)79:6<1025::AID-APP50>3.0.CO;2-7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shangguan YY, Wang YW, Wu Q, Chen GQ (2006) The mechanical properties and in vitro biodegradation and biocompatibility of UV-treated poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). Biomaterials 27:2349–2357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucas N, Bienaime C, Belloy C et al (2008) Polymer biodegradation: mechanisms and estimation techniques—a review. Chemosphere 73:429–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang Y, Asiri AM, Tang Z et al (2013) Graphene based materials for biomedical applications. Mater Today 16:365–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez CLC, Kessler F, Dubey N et al (2017) CVD graphene transfer procedure to the surface of stainless steel for stem cell proliferation. Surf Coat Technol 311:10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pokharel P DL (2014) Thermal and mechanical properties of reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposite. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:5718–5721.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2014.8824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yousefi N, Gudarzi MM, Zheng Q et al (2013) Highly aligned, ultralarge-size reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites: mechanical properties and moisture permeability. Composites A 49:42–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das TK, Prusty S (2013) Graphene-based polymer composites and their applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng 52:130227104444003.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2012.751410 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bae S, Kim SJ, Shin D et al (2012) Towards industrial applications of graphene electrodes. Phys Scr T146:14024.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T146/014024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fechine GJM, Martin-Fernandez I, Yiapanis G et al (2015) Direct dry transfer of chemical vapor deposition graphene to polymeric substrates. Carbon 83:224–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kang J, Hwang S, Kim JH et al (2012) Efficient transfer of large-area graphene films onto rigid substrates by hot pressing. ACS Nano 6:5360–5365.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn301207d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y et al (2010) Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat Nanotechnol 5:574–578.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liang X, Sperling B, Calizo I et al (2011) Toward clean and crackless transfer of graphene. ACS Nano 5:9144–9153.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn203377t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferreira FV, Cividanes LS, Gouveia RF, Lona LMF (2017) An overview on properties and applications of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)-PBAT based composites. Polym Eng Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24770 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu D, Wu L, Zhou W et al (2010) Crystallization and biodegradation of polylactide/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Eng Sci 50:1721–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10:19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021013921916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Potts JR, Dreyer DR, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 52:5–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li X, Cai W, An J et al (2009) Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science 324:1312–1314.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shimizu RN, Demarquette NR (2000) Evaluation of surface energy of solid polymers using different models. J Appl Polym Sci 76:1831–1845. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000620)76:12<1831::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-QGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V et al (2006) Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett 97:187401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kessler F, Rocha COC, Medeiros GS, Fechine GJM (2016) Chemical vapor deposition graphene transfer process to a polymeric substrate assisted by a spin coater. Mater Res Express 3:9.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/3/3/035601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Luckachan GE, Pillai CKS (2011) Biodegradable polymers—a review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. J Polym Environ 19:637–676.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-011-0317-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shih CJ, Wang QH, Lin S et al (2012) Breakdown in the wetting transparency of graphene. Phys Rev Lett 109:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.176101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang S, Zhang Y, Abidi N, Cabrales L (2009) Wettability and surface free energy of graphene films. Langmuir 25:11078–11081.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la901402f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Austin D, Moss MO (1986) Numerical Taxonomy of red-pigmented bacteria isolated from a Lowland River, with the description of a New Taxon, Rugamonas rubra gen. nov., sp. nov. Microbiology 132:1899–1909.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-132-7-1899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra AK et al (2012) Chemical functionalization of graphene and its applications. Prog Mater Sci 57:1061–1105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yu J, Yue B, Wu X et al (2016) The covalently organic functionalization of graphene: methodologies and protocols. Curr Org Chem 20:1284–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB et al (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr3000412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luiz F. Maldonado
    • 1
  • Pablo A. R. Muñoz
    • 1
  • Guilhermino J. M. Fechine
    • 1
  1. 1.MackGraphe – Graphene and Nanomaterials Research CenterMackenzie Presbyterian UniversitySão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations