Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1831–1843 | Cite as

Optimized Removal of Acid Blue 62 from Textile Waste Water by SBA-15/PAMAM Dendrimer Hybrid Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Maryam Mirzaie
  • Abosaeed Rashidi
  • Habib Allah Tayebi
  • Mohammad Esmail Yazdanshenas
Original Paper
First Online:
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

SBA-15/PAMAM Nano adsorbent was synthesized by the proficiency of SBA-15 as an original compound, 3-chloropropyltrimethoxysilane as a bridge chemical compound and polyamidoamine dendrimer (PAMAM) in the role of a multifunctional amine end group for adsorption of acid blue 62 (AB62) from aqueous media. The synthesized adsorbent was characterized by transmission electron microscope, field emission scanning electron microscope and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscope. A response surface methodology was employed to evaluate the simple and amalgamated factors of the operating variables subtending initial pH (2–12), adsorbent dosage(0.01–0.03 g), contact time (5–120 min), initial dye concentration (40–600 ppm) and temperature (25–45 °C) to optimize the operating statues of the treatment method. These parameters were altered at five levels pursuant to the central composite design to appraise their effects on AB62 removal through analysis of variance. Analysis of variance represented a high coefficient of definition amount (R2 = 0.9999) and acceptable prediction quadratic polynomial model was concluded which ascertain the suitability of the model and a high correlation among the predicted and empirical amounts. Utmost color removal efficiency was auspicated and empirically accredited. The optimum conditions relied on acquired results for AB62 removal were at an initial pH of 2, adsorbent dosage of 0.03 g SBA-15/PAMAM, dye concentration of 40 mg l−1, time contact of 60 min and temperature of 25 °C.

Keywords

Response surface methodology Polyamidoamine SBA-15 Dye removal 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Verma AK, Dash R, Bhunia P (2012) Review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. J Environ Manage 93: 154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang CH, Chang KP, Ou HD, et.al (2011) Adsorption of cationic dyes onto mesoporous silica. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 14: 102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orfao JJM, Silva AIM, Pereira JCV, et al (2006) Adsorption of a reactive dye on chemically modified activated carbons—influence of pH. J Colloid Interface Sci 296:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demirbas A (2009) Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. J Hazard Mater 167:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannan C, Muthuraja K, Devi MR (2013) Hazardous dyes removal from aqueous solution over mesoporous alumina phosphate with textural porosity by adsorption. J Hazard Mater 10:244–245Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ngai EWT, To CKM, Ching VSM, et al (2012) Development of the conceptual model of energy and utility management in textile processing: a soft systems approach. Int J Prod Econ 135:607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang CH, Chang KP, Ou HD, et al (2011) Characterization and application of Ti-containing mesoporous silica for dye removal with synergistic effect of coupled adsorption and photo catalytic oxidation. J Hazard Mater 186:174–1182Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faria P, Orfao J, Pereira M (2004) Adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes on activated carbons with different surface chemistries. Water Res 38:2043–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baskaralingam P, Pulikesi M, Ramamurthi V, et al (2006) Equilibrium studies for the adsorption of Acid dye onto modified hectorite. J Hazard Mater 136:989–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bechtold T, Burtscher E, Turcanu A (2001) Cathodic decolourisation of textile waste water containing reactive dyes using a multi-cathode electrolyser. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hachem C, Bocquillon F, Zahraa O, et al (2001) Decolourization of textile industry wastewater by the photocatalytic degradation process. Dyes and Pigments 49: 117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papic S, Koprivanac N, Bozic AL, et al (2004) Removal of some reactive dyes from synthetic wastewater by combined Al(III) coagulation/carbon adsorption process. Dyes and Pigments 62:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahmoodi NM (2013) Photocatalytic ozonation of dyes using multiwalled carbon nanotube. J Mol Catal A Chem 366:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali l, Gupta VK (2006) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ali l (2010) The quest for active carbon adsorbent substitutes: inexpensive adsorbents for toxic metal ions removal from wastewater. Sepn Purif Rev 39:95–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ali l (2012) New generation adsorbents for water treatment. Chem Rev 112:5073–5091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ali l (2012) Low cost adsorbents for removal of organic pollutants from wastewater. J Environ Manag 113:170–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ali l (2014) Water treatment by adsorption columns: evaluation at ground level. Sepn Purif Rev 43:175–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sadeghi-Kiakhani M, Arami M, Gharanjig K (2013) Dye removal from colored-textile wastewater using chitosan-PPI dendrimer hybrid as a biopolymer: optimization, kinetic, and isotherm studies. J Appl Polym Sci 127:2607–2619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zarezadeh-Mehrizi M, Badiei A (2014) Highly efficient removal of basic blue 41 with nano porous silica. Water Res Ind 5:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, et al (1992) Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves tailored using different synthesis conditions. Nature 359:710–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taguchi A, Schuth F (2005) Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 77:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stein A, Melde BJ, Schroden RC (2000) Hybrid inorganic-organic mesoporous silicates-nanoscopic reactors coming of age. Adv Mater 12:1403–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vinu A, Hossain KZ, Ariga K (2005) Recent advances in functionalization of mesoporous silica. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5:347–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blencowe A, Tan JF, Goh TK, et al (2009) Core crosslinked star polymers via controlled radical polymerization. Polymer 50:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jiang Y, Gao Q (2006) Heterogeneous hydrogenation catalyses over recyclable Pd(0) nanoparticle catalysts stabilized by PAMAM-SBA-15 organic–inorganic hybrid composites. J Am Chem Soc 128:716–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pisal D, Yellepeddi V, Kumar A, et al (2008) Permeability of surface-modified polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers across Caco-2 cell monolayers. Int J Pharm 350:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kovvali S, Sirkar K (2001) Dendrimer liquid membranes: CO2 separation from gas mixture. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:2502–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kouketsu T, Duan S, Kai T, et al (2007) PAMAM dendrimer composite membrane for CO2 separation: formation of a chitosan gutter layer. J Membr Sci 287:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang W, Simanek EE (2000) Dendrimers based on melamine, divergent and orthogonal, convergent syntheses of a G3 dendrimer. Org Lett 2:843–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aguado J, Arsuaga JM, Arencibia A, et al (2009) Aqueous heavy metals removal by adsorption on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica. J Hazard Mater 163:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vasiliev AN, Golovko LV, Trachevsky GS, et al (2009) Adsorption of heavy metal cations by organic ligands grafted on porous materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 118:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang L, Yu C, Zhao W, et al (2007) Preparation of multiamine-grafted mesoporous silicas and their application to heavy metal ions adsorption. J Non-Cryst Solids 353:4055–4061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jiang Y, Gao Q, Yu H, et al (2007) Intensively competitive adsorption for heavy metal ions by PAMAM-SBA-15 and EDTA–PAMAM–SBA-15 inorganic-organic hybrid materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 103:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bouchemal N, Azoudj Y, Merzougui Z, et al (2012) Adsorption modeling of orange G dye on mesoporous activated carbon prepared from Algerian date pits using experimental designs. Desalination Water Treat 45:284–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhao D, Huo Q, Stucky G, et al (1998) Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J Am Chem Soc 120:6024–6036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bagheryan Z, Jahan-Bakhsh R, Ojani R, et al (2014) Development of a new biosensor based on functionalized SBA-15 modified screen-printed graphite electrode as a nano-reactor for Gquadruplex recognition. Talanta 119:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bhagiyalakshmi M, Yun LJ, Anuradha R, et al (2010) Utilization of rice husk ash as silica source for the synthesis of mesoporoussilicas and their application to CO2 adsorption through TREN/TEPA grafting. J Hazard Mater 175:928–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cheng Q, Pavlinek V, Li C, et al (2006) Synthesis and characterization of new mesoporous material with conducting polypyrrole confined in mesoporous silica. Mater Chem Phys 98:504–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cao J, Wu Y, Jin Y, et al (2014) Response surface methodology approach for optimization of the removal of chromium(VI) by NH2-MCM-41. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:860–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lim CL, Morad N, Teng TT, et al (2011) Chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction of a reactive dye wastewater using H2O2/pyridine/Cu(II) system. Desalination Water Treat 278:26–30Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moghaddam SS, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Arami M (2011) Response surface optimization of acid red 119 dye from simulated wastewater using Al based waterworks sludge and polyaluminium chloride as coagulant. J Environ Manag 92:1284–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rauf MA, Marzouki N, Körbahti BK (2008) Photolytic decolorization of Rose Bengal by UV/H2O2 and data optimization using response surface method. J Hazard Mater 159:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brereton RG (2003) Chemometrics: data analysis for the laboratory and chemical plant. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hamzeh Y, Azadeh E, Izadyar S (2011) Removal of reactive Remazol Black B from contaminated water by lignocellulose waste of canola stalks. J Color Sci Technol 5:77–85Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guaracho VV, Kaminari NMS, Ponte MJJS, et al (2009) Central composite experimental design applied to removal of lead and nickel from sand. J Hazard Mater 172:1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Olmez-Hanci T, Kartal Z, Arslan-Alaton I (2012) Electrocoagulation of commercial naphthalene sulfonates: process optimization and assessment of implementation potential. J Environ Manag 99:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang Z, Zheng H (2009) Optimization for decolorization of azo dye acid green 20 by ultrasound and H2O2 using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 172:1388–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kayan B, Gözmen B (2012) Degradation of Acid red 274 using H2O2 in subcritical water: application of response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 201–202:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Annadurai G (2002) Adsorption of basic dye on strongly chelating polymer: batch kinetics studies. Iran Polym J 11:237–244Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Crini G, Gimbert F, Robert C, et al (2008) The removal of Basic blue 3 from aqueous solutions by chitosan-based adsorbent: batch studies. J Hazard Mater 153:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zonoozi MH, Alavi Moghaddam MR, Arami M (2008) Removal of acid red 398 dye from aqueous solutions by coagulation/flocculation process. Environ Eng Manag J 7:695–699Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chiou MS, Li HY (2003) Adsorption behavior of reactive dye in aqueous solution on chemical cross-linked chitosan beads. Chemosphere 50:1095–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Alley ER (2000) Water quality control handbook. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yoshida H, Okamoto A, Kataoka T (1993) Adsorption of acid dye on cross-linked chitosan fibers: equilibria. Chem Eng Sci 48:2267–2272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wang S, Ng CW, Wang W, et al (2012) A comparative study on the adsorption of acid and reactive dyes on multiwall carbon nanotubes in single and binary dye systems. J Chem Eng Data 57:1563–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sun D, Zhang X, Wu Y, et al (2010) Adsorption of anionic dyes from aqueous solution on fly ash. J Hazard Mater 181:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Santhi T, Manonmani S, Smitha T (2010) Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution by activated carbon prepared from the epicarp of Ricinus communis by adsorption. J Hazard Mater 179:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Shirmardi M, Mesdaghinia A, Mahvi AH, et al (2012) Kinetics and equilibrium studies on adsorption of Acid Red 18 (Azo-Dye) using multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) from aqueous solution. Euro J Chem 9:2371–2383Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang S, Ng CW, Wang W, et al (2012) Synergistic and competitive adsorption of organic dyes on multiwalled carbon. Chem Eng J 197:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Anbia M, Salehi S (2012) Removal of acid dyes from aqueous media by adsorption onto amino-functionalized nanoporous silica SBA-3. Dyes and Pigments 94:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ho KY, Mckay G, Yeung KL (2003) Selective adsorbents from ordered mesoporous silica. Langmuir 19:3019–3024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Qin Q, Ma J, Liu K (2009) Adsorption of anionic dyes on ammonium-functionalized MCM-41. J Hazard Mater 162:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryam Mirzaie
    • 1
  • Abosaeed Rashidi
    • 1
  • Habib Allah Tayebi
    • 2
  • Mohammad Esmail Yazdanshenas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Textile Engineering, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Textile EngineeringIslamic Azad University, Qaemshahr BranchQaemshahrIran
  3. 3.Department of Textile EngineeringIslamic Azad University, Yazd BranchYazdIran

Personalised recommendations