Advertisement

Journal of Polymers and the Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 175–182 | Cite as

Leather Insole with Acupressure Effect: New Perspectives

  • Rethinam SenthilEmail author
  • Thotapalli Parvathaleswara Sastry
  • Gnanasundaram Saraswathy
  • Bhabendra Nath Das
  • Nallathambi Gobi
Original Paper

Abstract

Some wastes contain many reusable substances of high value. Solid leather waste is one such potential waste which can be converted into value added products. This study attempts to prepare leather insoles with acupressure effect from finished leather wastes and used leather wastes. Leather with acupressure effect (LAE) was fabricated using regenerated leather. LAE was characterized physico-chemically using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermo gravimetric analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Foot pressure measurements were done using LAE insoles on healthy individuals. Results proved that LAE insoles were able to increase the foot pressure of the wearer and thereby created an acupressure effect in them. Wearing of footwear with LAE insoles were beneficial compared to regular insoles. LAE possessed the required mechanical properties for insole production and it was also biodegradable in nature. The study proves that these composites could be successfully used for the production of cost-effective leather goods and therapeutic footwear. Production of useful byproducts from wastes is income generating and at the same time reduces environmental pollution and a feasible technology for waste recycling has been proved in this study.

Keywords

Leather waste Leather fiber Natural polymer Acupressure insole 

Notes

Acknowledgements

R. Senthil acknowledges the funding support granted by the Department of Science and Technology. India.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Midhaand V, Dey A (2008) Biological treatment of tannery waste water for sulfide removal. Int J Chem Sci 6:472–486Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FAO (1998) World statistical compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear. 1979–1997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gish AJ (2000) Leather board, a practical use of tannery offal. J Am Leather Chem As 95:43–47Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senthil R, Hemalatha T, Kumar BS, Uma, TS, Das BN, Sastry TP (2015) Recycling of finished leather wastes: a novel approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pati A, Chaudhary R, Subramani S (2014) A review on management of chrome-tanned leather shavings: a holistic paradigm to combat the environmental issues. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3055-9 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raghava Rao J, Thanikaivelan P, Sreeram KJ, Unni Nair B (2002) Green route for the utilization of chrome shavings (Chromium-containing solid waste) in tanning industry. Environ Sci Technol 36:1372–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lakrafli H, Tahiri S, Albizane A, EI Otmani ME (2012) Effect of wet blue chrome shaving and buffing dust of leather industry on the thermal conductivity of cement and plaster based materials. Constr Build Mater 30:590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sastry TP, Sehgal PK, Ramasamy T (2005) Value added eco- friendly products from tannery solid wastes. J Environ Sci Eng 47:250–255Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senthil R, Hemalatha T, Manikandan R, Das BN, Sastry TP (2015) Leather boards from buffing dust: a novel perspective. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viswanathan V, Kesavan R, Kavitha KV, Kumpatle S (2011) A pilot study on the effects of a polyherbal formulation cream on diabetic foot ulcers. Indian J Med Res 134:168–173Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsay SL, Chen ML (2003) Acupressure and quality of sleep in patients with end-stage renal disease–a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 40:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Embong NH, Soh YC, Wong TW (2015) Revisiting reflexology: concept, evidence, current practice and practitioner training. J Tradit Complement Med 5:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Senthil R, Vedakumarai WS, Hemalatha T, Das BN, Sastry TP (2015) Leather fibers as reinforcement for epoxy composites: a novel perspective. Fiber Polym 16: 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swarnalatha S, Srinivasulu T, Srimurali M, Sekaran G (2008) Safe disposal of toxic chrome buffing dust generated from leather industries. J Hazard Mater 150:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis.15th edn. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peavy HS, Rowe DR, Tchobanogloas G (1985) Environmental Enginering, Mc Graw Hill, International Editions. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, pp. 584–585Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li L, Frey M, Browning KJ (2010) Biodegradability Study on Cotton and Polyester Fabrics. J Eng Fiber Fabr 5:42–53Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fourti O, Jedidi N, Hassen A (2010) Humic substances change during the co-composting process of municipal solid wastes and sewage sludge. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:2117–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roy RV, Das M, Banerjee R, Bhowmick AK (2006) Comparative studies on crosslinked and uncrosslinked natural rubber biodegradation by Pseudomonas sp. Bioresour Technol 97:2485–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rohana, Yahya YS, Azura AR, Ahmad Z (2011) Effect of Curing Systems on Thermal Degradation Behaviour of Natural Rubber (SMR CV 60). J Physica Sci 22:1–14Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prompunjai W, Sridach (2010) Preparation and Some Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials Made from Sawdust, Cassava Starch and Natural Rubber Latex. World Aca Sci Eng Technol 48:12–25Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dodwell G (1989) Components: guidelines and characteristics. SATRA Bulletin 208–209Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pantazi M, Stefan DM, Constantinescu R, Vasilescu AM (2014) Comparative Study on the Enzymatic Biodegradation of Synthetic and Tanned Leather Wastes. Rev Chim 65:233–236Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharmila S, Jeyanthi Rebecca L (2014) A Comparative Study on the Degradation of Leather Industry Effluent by Marine Algae. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 25:46–50Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Senthil R, Inbasekaran S, Kobi N, Das BN, Sastry TP (2015) Utilization of finished leather wastes for the production of blended fabrics. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1535–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tatano F, Acerbi N, Monterubbiano C, Pretelli S, Tombari L, Mangani F (2012) Shoe manufacturing wastes: characterisation of properties and recovery options. Resour Conser Recy 66:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bernal MP, Paredes C, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Cegarra J (1998) Maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared with a wide range of organic wastes. Bioresour Technol 63:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brodsky JW, Kourosh S, Stills M, Mooney V (1998) Objective evaluation of insert material for, diabetic and athletic footwear. J Foot Ankle Res 9:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whittle MW, Chattanooga TN (1996) The Use of Viscoelastic Materials in Shoes and Insoles A Review. Magister Corporation, Printed in Canada. 07/05 LIB 7/05 LIBGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Janisse DJ (1995) Prescription insoles and footwear. Clin Podiatr Medicine Surg 12:41–61Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karthikeyan R, Chandra Babu NK, Ramesh R (2013) Therapeutic applications of stingray leather. Glop J Biosci Biotechnol 2:287–289Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rethinam Senthil
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thotapalli Parvathaleswara Sastry
    • 1
  • Gnanasundaram Saraswathy
    • 2
  • Bhabendra Nath Das
    • 2
  • Nallathambi Gobi
    • 3
  1. 1.Biological Materials LabCSIR-Central Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Shoe Design and Development CentreCSIR-Central Leather Research InstituteChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Textile TechnologyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations