Synthesis and Characterization of Biodegradable Starch-Polyacrylamide Graft Copolymers Using Starches with Different Microstructures
- 637 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
The effects of starch structures, in particular amylose content, on grafting reactions were investigated using thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray diffraction (XRD). As a model system, corn starches with different amylose contents (0, 26, 50 and 80 %) were grafted onto acrylamide to produce superabsorbent polymers (SAPs). The weight loss measured by TGA at different temperature was used to analyze the grafting ratio in quantity. In general, the grafting ratio increased (about 10 %) with increasing starch amylose content, and graft chain segment lengths were much lower for the amylopectin-rich (waxy) starch. The high molecular weight and branched structure of the amylopectin reduced the mobility of the polymer chains and increased viscosity, which resulted in resistance to chain growth. The water absorption capability was increased with increasing amylose content for the starch-based SAPs. XRD detection showed that the crystalline structure of all starches was destroyed after grafting reactions. The thermal stability of the polyacrylamide grafted onto the starches increased by about 10 °C, which could be explained by the strong bonding between the grafted polymer chains and the starch matrices.
Keywords
Starch Amylose Superabsorbent polymer Miscrostructure TGANotes
Acknowledgments
The authors from SCUT, China, would like to acknowledge the research funds NFSC (21174043, 31130042), RFDPHE (20110172110027) and FRFCU (2012ZZ0085). Thanks also to Dr S. Li (CSIRO) for contact angle measurements and analysis.
References
- 1.Lanthong P, Nuisin R, Kiatkamjornwong S (2006) Carbohydr Polym 66:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Zohuriaan MJ, Kabiri K (2008) Iran Polym J 17:451Google Scholar
- 3.Arvanitoyannis I (1999) J. Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys C39:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Psomiadou E, Arvanitoyannis I, Biliaderis CG, Ogawa H, Kawasaki N (1997) Carbohydr Polym 33:227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Zhang LM, Chen DQ (2001) Starch-Stärke 53:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Zhang LM, Hu ZH (2002) Starch-Stärke 54:290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Shaikh MM, Lonikar SV (2009) J Appl Polym Sci 114:2893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Han TL, Kumar RN, Rozman HD, Noor MAM (2003) Carbohydr Polym 54:509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Nakason C, Wohmang T, Kaesaman A, Kiatkamjornwong S (2010) Carbohydr Polym 81:348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Cho CG, Lee K (2002) Carbohydr Polym 48:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Song H, Zhang SF, Ma XC, Wang DZ, Yang JZ (2007) Carbohydr Polym 69:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fanta GF, Felker FC, Shogren RL (2004) Carbohydr Polym 56:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ma YHC, Manolache S, Sarmadi M, Denes FS (2004) Starch-Stärke 56:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Samaha SH, Nasr HE, Hebeish A (2005) J Polym Res 12:343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Xu SM, Wei J, Feng S, Wang JD, Li XS (2004) J Polym ResTaiwan 1(1):211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Xu S, Wang J, Wu R, Wang J (2006) Carbohydr Polym 66:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Meshram MW, Patil VV, Mhaske ST, Thorat BN (2009) Carbohydr Polym 75:71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mostafa KM, Morsy MS (2004) Starch-Stärke 56:254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kaith BS, Jindal R, Jana AK, Maiti M (2010) Bioresour Technol 101:6843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Salam A, Pawlak JJ, Venditti RA, Ei-tahlawy K (2010) Biomacromolecules 11:1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yamaguchi M, Watamoto H, Sakamoto M (1988) Carbohydr Polym 9:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.De Bruyn H, Sprong E, Gaborieau M, Roper JA, Gilbert RG (2007) J Polym Sci Pol Chem 44:4185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Comer CM, Jessop JLR (2008) Starch-Stärke 60:335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Zou W, Yu L, Liu X, Qiao DL, Zhang X, Chen L, Zhang R (2012) Carbohydr Polym 87:1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Meister JJ (1981) J Rheol 25:487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wu J, Lin J, Zhou M, Wei C (2000) Macromol Rapid Commun 21:1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.McNeill IC, Sadeghi SMT (1990) Polym Degrad Stab 29:233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Athawale VD, Lele V (2000) Starch-Stärke 52:205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Liu X, Yu L, Xie F, Li M, Chen L, Li X (2010) Starch-Stärke 62:139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Liu X, Yu L, Liu H, Chen L, Li L (2009) Cereal Chem 86:383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Soares RMD, Lima AMF, Oliveira RVB, Pires ATN, Soldi V (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 90:449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Zhang X, Golding J, Burgar I (2002) Polymer 43:5791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Beninca C, Demiate IM, Lacerda LG, Carvalho Filho MAS, Ionashiro M, Schnitzler E (2008) Eclet Quím São Paulo 33:13Google Scholar
- 34.Fares MM, Ei-faqeeh AS, Osman ME (2003) J Polym Res Taiwan 10:119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Athawale VD, Lele V (1998) Carbohydr Polym 35:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Athawale VD, Rathi SC (1999) J Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem Phys C39:445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Liu H, Yu L, Xie W, Chen L (2006) Carbohydr Polym 65:357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Gurruchaga M, Goni I, Vazquez B, Valero M, Guzman GM (1992) Macromolecules 25:3009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Pal S, Nasim T, Patra A, Ghosh S, Panda AB (2010) Int J Biol Macromol 47:623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Sen G, Kumar R, Ghosh S, Pal S (2009) Carbohydr Polym 77:822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Zhang Q, Xu K, Wang P (2008) Fibers Polym 9:271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Michaels AS (1954) Ind Eng Chem 46:1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Ghosh S, Sen G, Jha U, Pal S (2010) Bioresour Technol 101:9638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Rath SK, Singh RP (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 66:1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Rath SK, Singh RP (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Douzals JP, Marechal PA, Coquille JC, Gervais P (1996) J Agric Food Chem 44:1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Cheetham NWH, Tao LP (1998) Carbohydr Polym 36:277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Liu H, Yu L, Simon G, Dean K, Chen L (2009) Carbohydr Polym 77:662CrossRefGoogle Scholar