Effect of Solvent Composition on Porosity, Surface Morphology and Thermal Behavior of Metal Alginate Prepared from Algae (Undaria pinnatifida)
- 205 Downloads
Alginates, extracted from algae are linear unbranched polymers containing β-(1→4)-linked d-mannuronic acid (M) and α-(1→4)-linked l-guluronic acid (G) residues. The conversion of alginic acid into the metal alginate is confirmed using FTIR spectroscopy. Asymmetric and symmetric stretching of free carboxyl group present in metal alginate occurs almost at the same position in various solvent compositions. Total intrusion volume of metal alginate prepared in propanol (0.0742 mL/g) is greater compared to those in ethanol (0.0648 mL/g) and methanol (0.0393 mL/g) as solvent. Surface morphology as well as porosity and pore size distribution of metal alginate are greatly influenced by solvent. It can be seen from thermal analysis results that calcium alginate prepared using different solvent compositions started decomposing at 100 °C, but rapid degradation started around 200 °C. The results showed a stepwise weight loss during thermal sweep, indicating different types of reactions during degradation. First and second step of rapid degradation was situated around 200–300 and 300–550 °C, respectively; whereas the final step is situated around 550–650 °C. The trend of degradation was similar for all the solvents, although the amount of final residue varied from one solvent to another. At the same time, lower thermal stability was also observed with higher heating rates. Additionally, a kinetic analysis was performed to fit with TGA data, where the entire degradation process has been considered as three consecutive first order reactions.
KeywordsMetal alginate Porosity Surface morphology Thermal behavior Kinetic analysis
This study was supported by a Grant of Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST), South Korea.
- 1.Muzzarelli RAA (1973) Natural chelating polymers International series of monographs in analytical chemistry. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- 6.Timmins P, Delargy AM, Minchom CM, Howard R (1992) Eur J Pharm Biopharm 38:113–118Google Scholar
- 8.Sabra W, Deckwer WD (2005) In: Dumitriu S (ed) Polysaccharides structural diversity and functional versatility. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 515Google Scholar
- 9.Stanford P, Baird J (1983) The polysaccharides. Academic press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chanda SK, Hirst EL, Percival BGV, Ross AG (1952) J Chem Soc 1833–1837Google Scholar
- 35.Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Bloch D, Abe A, Grulke EA (1999) In: Grulke EA (ed) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar