Pulsed Eddy Current Data Analysis for the Characterization of the Second-Layer Discontinuities

  • Yihao Liu
  • Shuo Liu
  • Huan Liu
  • Catalin Mandache
  • Zheng LiuEmail author


Pulsed eddy current (PEC) technique has been applied as a viable method to detect hidden discontinuities in metallic structures. Conventionally, selected time-domain features are employed to characterize the PEC data, such as peak value, lift-off point of intersection, rising point, crossing time, and differential time to peak. The research presented in this paper continues the effort in a previous study on detecting the radial cracks starting from the fastener hole in second layer of a two-layer mock-up aircraft structure. A large diameter excitation coil with ferrite core is used to induce a strong pulse, and the magnetic field generated by eddy current is detected by Hall sensors. Instead of analyzing the limited time-domain features, we propose using machine learning methods to interpret the raw data without feature extraction. Thus, the second-layer discontinuities can be characterized presumably with all the information contained in a waveform. An automated detection framework is proposed in this paper and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.


Pulse eddy current Lift-off intersection Second-layer crack Machine learning Classification 



Mr. Marc Genest at National Research Council of Canada is acknowledged for his valuable comments and feedback, which help improve the quality of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Sophian, A., Tian, G.Y., Taylor, D., Rudlin, J.: Electromagnetic and eddy current NDT: a review. INSIGHT 43(5), 302–306 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sophian, A., Tian, G., Fan, M.: Pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing and evaluation: a review. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 30(3), 500–514 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kriezis, E., Tsiboukis, T., Panas, S.M., Tegopoulos, J.: Eddy currents: theory and applications. Proc. IEEE 80(10), 1559–1589 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tian, G.Y., Zhao, Z.X., Baines, R.W.: The research of inhomogeneity in eddy current sensors. Sens. Actuators A Physi. 69(2), 148–151 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park, D.-G., Sekar Angani, C., Rao, B.P.C., Vértesy, G., Lee, D.-H., Kim, K.-H.: Detection of the subsurface cracks in a stainless steel plate using pulsed eddy current. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 32(4), 350–353 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Angani, C.S., Park, D.G., Kim, C.G., Leela, P., Kollu, P., Cheong, Y.M.: The pulsed eddy current differential probe to detect a thickness variation in an insulated stainless steel. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 29(4), 248–252 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghoni, R., Dollah, M., Sulaiman, A., Mamat Ibrahim., F.: Defect characterization based on eddy current technique: technical review. Adv. Mech. Eng. 6, 182496 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, T., Tian, G.Y., Sophian, A., Que, P.W.: Feature extraction and selection for defect classification of pulsed eddy current NDT. NDT & E Int. 41(6), 467–476 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Safizadeh, M.S., Forsyth, D.S., Liu, Z., Lepine, B.A., Liao, M.: Pulsed eddy current inspections of aircraft structures in support of holistic damage tolerance. In: Proceedings of the Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference & Exposition. SAE International (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, Z., Wu, X., Li, J., Kang, Y.: Assessment of wall thinning in insulated ferromagnetic pipes using the time-to-peak of differential pulsed eddy-current testing signals. NDT & E Int. 51, 24–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    He, Y., Luo, F., Pan, M., Weng, F., Xiangchao, H., Gao, J., Liu, Bo: Pulsed eddy current technique for defect detection in aircraft riveted structures. NDT & E Int. 43(2), 176–181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Y., Chen, Z., Qi, Y.: Generalized analytical expressions of liftoff intersection in pec and a liftoff-intersection-based fast inverse model. IEEE Trans. Magn. 47(10), 2931–2934 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tian, G.Y., Li, Y., Mandache, C.: Study of lift-off invariance for pulsed eddy-current signals. IEEE Trans. Magn. 45(1), 184–191 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tian, G.Y., Sophian, A.: Defect classification using a new feature for pulsed eddy current sensors. NDT & E Int. 38(1), 77–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He, Y., Luo, F., Pan, M., Xiangchao, H., Gao, J., Liu, B.: Defect classification based on rectangular pulsed eddy current sensor in different directions. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 157(1), 26–31 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stott, C.A., Underhill, P.R., Babbar, V.K.: Pulsed eddy current detection of cracks in multilayer aluminum lap joints. IEEE Sens. J. 15(2), 956–962 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Butt, D.M., Underhill, P.R., Krause, T.W.: Examination of pulsed eddy current for inspection of second layer aircraft wing lap-joint structures using outlier detection methods. CINDE J. 37(5), 6–10 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Butt, D., Underhill, R., Krause,T.W.: Pulsed eddy current detection of second layer cracks at ferrous fasteners in aircraft lap-joint structures. In: Proceedings of the 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing, pp. 1–8, Munich, Germany (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pan, M., He, Y., Tian, G., Chen, D., Luo, F.: PEC frequency band selection for locating defects in two-layer aircraft structures with air gap variations. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 62(10), 2849–2856 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Safizadeh, M.S., Lepine, B.A., Forsyth, D.S., Fahr, A.: Time–frequency analysis of pulsed eddy current signals. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 20(2), 73–86 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hosseini, S.M.S.: Detection of hidden corrosion by pulsed eddy current using time frequency analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    He, Y., Pan, M., Luo, F., Chen, D., Xiangchao, H.: Support vector machine and optimised feature extraction in integrated eddy current instrument. Measurement 46(1), 764–774 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, Z., Forsyth, D.S., Lepine, B.A., Hammad, I., Farahbakhsh, B.: Investigations on classifying pulsed eddy current signals with a neural network. INSIGHT 45(9), 608–614 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mandache, C., Whalen, P.: A gradual approach for the detection of second layer cracks using the pulsed eddy current technique. In: Proceedings of the Aircraft Airworthiness&Sustainment Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zheng, B., Yoon, S.W., Lam, S.S.: Breast cancer diagnosis based on feature extraction using a hybrid of k-means and support vector machine algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(4), 1476–1482 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tehrany, M.S., Pradhan, B., Jebur, M.N.: Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam) 512, 332–343 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    John, V., Mita, S., Liu, Z., Qi, B.: Pedestrian detection in thermal images using adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 14th IAPR International Conference on Machine Vision Applications (MVA), pp. 246–249. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995). CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ho, T.K.: Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 278–282. IEEE (1995)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. ICML 96, 148–156 (1996)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Friedman, J.H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29(5), 1189–1232 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2(5), 359–366 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oshiro, T.M., Perez, P.S., Baranauskas, J.A.: How many trees in a random forest? In: Proceedings of the MLDM, pp. 154–168. Springer (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British Columbia (Okanagan)KelownaCanada
  2. 2.School of AutomationChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  3. 3.National Research Council of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations