Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 535–546 | Cite as

Reflection Phase Measurements for Ultrasonic NDE of Titanium Diffusion Bonds

  • Edwill Escobar-Ruiz
  • David C. Wright
  • Ian J. Collison
  • Peter Cawley
  • Peter B. Nagy
Article

Abstract

The adoption of diffusion bonding in fracture critical titanium components has been limited by the complications that macroscopic anisotropy introduces to typical ultrasonic inspections. Previous attempts to overcome these limitations by using signal phase to extract otherwise hidden interface information showed promise but were susceptible to measurement error and proved impractical for typical aerospace component geometries. In the work presented here, significant improvements to the existing phase measurement approach are proposed alongside adaptations that permit its broader practical implementation. The principal parameters that affect the phase analysis of ultrasonic signals were investigated and their optimisation resulted in up to an order of magnitude improvement in phase measurement reliability, even at low signal-to-noise ratios. The application of these optimised parameters without a priori knowledge of the signal arrival time in an otherwise noisy waveform is illustrated, and the sensitivity of the approach to ambient temperature and annealing effects is also explored.

Keywords

Diffusion bond Interfacial stiffness  Single-sided Signal phase True phase Titanium Ultrasound 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was jointly funded by Rolls-Royce plc, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the UK Research Centre in NDE. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Phill Doorbar and David Rugg.

References

  1. 1.
    Doorbar, P., Dixon, M., Chatterjee, A.: Aero-engine titanium: from alloys to composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 618, 127–134 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pavlov, S.V., Isaev, A.A., Zav’yalova, N.: Ultrasonic inspection in the production of disk blanks made of granulated nickel alloys. Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 33, 934–936 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas, G.H., Spingarn, J.R.: Ultrasonic evaluation of solid-state welds. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 7, 227–235 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panetta, P.D., Margetan, F.J., Yalda, I., Thompson, R.B.: Ultrasonic attenuation measurements in jet-engine titanium alloys. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 15, 1525–1532 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Margetan, F.J., Wasan, H., Thompson, R.B.: An experimental study of microstructure-induced ultrasonic signal fluctuations in jet-engine titanium alloys. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 19, 1433–1440 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blodgett, M.P., Eylon, D.: The influence of texture and phase distortion on ultrasonic attenuation in Ti-6Al-4V. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 20, 1–16 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Derby, B., Briggs, G.A.D., Wallach, E.R.: Non-destructive testing and acoustic microscopy of diffusion bonds. J. Mater. Sci. 18, 2345–2353 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weglein, R.D.: Titanium diffusion bond evaluation via acoustic microscopy. Ultrason. Symp. 2, 1045–1048 (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Windels, F., Leroy, O.: Air-coupled ultrasonic testing of diffusion bonds. Ultrasonics 40, 171–176 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas, G.H., Chinn, D.: Signal analysis approach to ultrasonic evaluation of diffusion bond quality. Nondestruct. Charact. Mater. IX 497, 536–542 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavrentyev, A.I., Beals, J.T.: Ultrasonic measurement of the diffusion bond strength. Ultrasonics 38, 513–516 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, L., Shi, Y.W., Chen, J., Li, X.M., Guo, G.P.: Ultrasonic testing of the diffusion bonding of titanium alloys. Insight 48, 415–417 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Milne, K., Cawley, P., Nagy, P.B., Wright, D.C., Dunhill, A.: Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation of titanium diffusion bonds. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 30, 225–236 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baik, J.M., Thompson, R.B.: Ultrasonic scattering from imperfect interfaces: a quasi-static model. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 4, 177–196 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Margetan, F.J., Thompson, R.B., Gray, T.A.: Interfacial spring model for ultrasonic interactions with imperfect interfaces: theory of oblique incidence and application to diffusion-bonded butt joints. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 7, 131–152 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palmer, D.D., Rehbein, D.K., Smith, J.F., Buck, O.: Nondestructive characterization of the mechanical strength of diffusion bonds. I. Experimental results. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 7, 153–166 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lavrentyev, A.I., Rokhlin, S.I.: Ultrasonic spectroscopy of imperfect contact interfaces between a layer and two solids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 657–664 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brotherhood, C.J., Drinkwater, B.W., Guild, F.J.: The effect of compressive loading on the ultrasonic detectability of kissing bonds in adhesive joints. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 21, 95–104 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buck, O., Thompson, R.B., Rehbein, D.K., Palmer, D.D., Brasche, L.J.H.: Contacting surfaces: a problem in fatigue and diffusion bonding. Metall. Trans. A 20, 627–636 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagy, P.B., Adler, L.: Ultrasonic NDE of solid-state bonds: inertia and friction welds. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 7, 199–215 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pilant, W.L., Knopoff, L., Schwab, F.: Transmission and reflection of surface waves at a corner. 3. Rayleigh waves (Experimental). J. Geophys. Res. 69, 291–297 (1964)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Instanes, G., Pedersen, A., Toppe, M., Nagy, P.B.: Constant group velocity ultrasonic guided wave inspection for corrosion and erosion monitoring in pipes. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 28, 1386–1393 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Escobar-Ruiz, E., Cawley, P., Nagy, P.B., Collison, I.J., Wright, D.C.: Ultrasonic NDE of titanium diffusion bonds using signal phase. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 32, 1409–1416 (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Desilets, C.S., Fraser, J.D., Kino, G.S.: The design of efficient broadband piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 25, 115–125 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kossoff, G.: The effects of backing and matching on the performance of piezoelectric ceramic transducers. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 13, 20–30 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gachagan, A., Harvey, G., O’Leary, R.L., Mackersie, J.: Investigating the influence of the constituent materials on the performance of periodic piezoelectric composite arrays. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 26, 759–766 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oppenheim, A., Schafer, R.: Digital Signal Processing, 1st edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1975)MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harris, F.J.: On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete fourier transform. Proc. IEEE 66, 51–83 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shiavi, R.: Introduction to Applied Statistical Signal Analysis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Burlington (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paliwal, K., Wójcicki, K., Shannon, B.: The importance of phase in speech enhancement. Speech Commun. 53, 465–494 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reddy, N.S., Swamy, M.N.S.: Derivative of the phase spectrum of truncated autoregressive signals. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 32, 616–618 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Instanes, G., Toppe, M., Lakshminarayan, B., Nagy, P.B.: Corrosion and erosion monitoring of pipes by an ultrasonic guided wave method. In: Kundu, T. (ed.) Advanced Ultrasonic Methods for Materials and Structure Inspection, pp. 115–157. ISTE Ltd, London (2007) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wenbo, H., Kaifeng, Z., Guofeng, W.: Superplastic forming and diffusion bonding for honeycomb structure of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 183, 450–454 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vázquez, M., Ramos, A., Leija, L., Vera, A.: Noninvasive temperature estimation in oncology hyperthermia using phase changes in pulse-echo ultrasonic signals. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 7991–7998 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    British Standards Institution BS EN 583–1:1999: Non-Destructive Testing: Ultrasonic Examination-General Principles. BSI, London (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edwill Escobar-Ruiz
    • 1
    • 2
  • David C. Wright
    • 2
  • Ian J. Collison
    • 2
  • Peter Cawley
    • 1
  • Peter B. Nagy
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.RCNDEImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Rolls-Royce plcDerbyUK
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering MechanicsUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations