Mimicking Others’ Nonverbal Signals is Associated with Increased Attitude Contagion
Observing nonverbal signals being directed toward unfamiliar individuals is known to influence attitudes and behavior toward those individuals. Specifically, observing biased nonverbal signals in favor of one individual over another can produce nonverbal signal-consistent attitudes among preschool children. Research has also shown that people have a tendency to mimic the behavior of others. The phenomenon of mimicking another’s nonverbal emotional response and “catching” their emotions has long been established. However, it has yet to be examined whether this phenomenon is associated with attitude contagion. We hypothesized that preschool children who mimic the biased nonverbal signals of others will be more likely to adopt their social attitudes. Results of the current study indicated that as emotional mimicry became more frequent, children showed an increasingly greater probability of acquiring nonverbal signal-consistent attitudes. Moreover, the frequency of negative—but not positive—emotional mimicry was related to an increased probability of showing nonverbal signal-consistent attitudes. Our findings provide initial support for the notion that mimicking others’ biased nonverbal signals may help facilitate attitude contagion.
KeywordsSocial bias Nonverbal signals Children Mimicry Emotional mimicry Attitude contagion
- Castelli, L., De Dea, C., & Nesdale, D. (2008). Learning social attitudes: Children’s sensitivity to the nonverbal behaviors of adult models during interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1504–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coles, N. A., Larsen, J. T., & Lench, H. (2017). A meta-analysis of the facial feedback hypothesis literature. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/svjru.
- Geangu, E., Quadrelli, E., Conte, S., Croci, E., & Turati, C. (2016). Three-year-olds’ rapid facial electromyographic responses to emotional facial expressions and body postures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 144, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossard, C., Chaby, L., Hun, S., Pellerin, H., Bourgeois, J., Dapogny, A., et al. (2018). Children facial expression production: Influence of age, gender, emotion subtype, elicitation condition and culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 151–177.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E. C., Bensman, L., Thornton, P. D., & Rapson, R. L. (2014). New perspectives on emotional contagion: A review of classic and recent research on facial mimicry and contagion. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 8, 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2017). The role of emotional mimicry in intergroup relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murata, A., Saito, H., Schug, J., Ogawa, K., & Kameda, T. (2016). Spontaneous facial mimicry is enhanced by the goal of inferring emotional states: Evidence for moderation of “automatic” mimicry. Higher Cognitive Processes, 11(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar