Estimating Pain and Disability in Virtual Patients with Low Back Pain: The Contribution of Nonverbal Behaviors
It is well recognized that chronic low back pain (cLBP) can be estimated from nonverbal pain behaviors. However, only a few studies examined how clinicians rely on those when estimating specific outcomes, such as pain intensity and pain disability. Therefore, the present study examines (1) if facial expressions and guarding behaviors (including speed of the movement and lifting strategy) contribute to the prediction of pain intensity and disability in patients with cLBP; and (2) if these pain behaviors have been given the same importance according to the outcome. Twenty-five experienced clinicians and thirty-one novice clinicians were asked to estimate low back pain intensity and disability from a realistic virtual character performing a lifting lowering task. The studied pain behaviors were manipulated across different conditions. Pain intensity and disability were judged higher when the character moved more slowly and displayed painful facial expression. Speed of the movement and facial expressions explained a greater portion of variance when related to pain intensity assessment than to pain disability assessment. Results also showed a significant interaction between the lifting strategy, the speed of the movement and facial expressions, but only when estimating the character’s pain-related intensity. Novice clinicians rated pain disability higher than experienced clinicians did. Although pain-related concepts, pain intensity and related disability are not estimated through the same pain behaviors by clinicians. Clinical experience does not contribute to clinical judgments through the use of nonverbal pain behaviors when estimating pain outcomes but contributes to pain disability rating overall.
KeywordsClinical judgment Low back pain Nonverbal behaviors Medical expertise
The authors thank Pierre Black for his assistance in creating the 3D realistic characters, and Geneviève Côté for her help in preparing the manuscript.
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
- Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S240–S252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang, D.-H., Chou, S.-W., Chen, Y.-L., & Chiou, W.-K. (2014). Frowning and jaw clenching muscle activity reflects the perception of effort during incremental workload cycling. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(4), 921–928.Google Scholar
- IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. (1994). Part III: Pain terms, a current list with definitions and notes on usage. In H. Merskey & N. Bogduk (Eds.), Classification of chronic pain (2nd ed., pp. 209–214). Seattle: IASP Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, M., Christensen, N., & Carr, J. (1994). Clinical reasoning in orthopaedic manual therapy. In R. Grant (Ed.), Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine (2nd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
- Lehman, G. J. (2004). Biomechanical assessments of lumbar spinal function. How low back pain sufferers differ from normals. Implications for outcome measures research. Part I: Kinematic assessments of lumbar function. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 27(1), 57–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- May, S., Withers, S., Reeve, S., & Greasley, A. (2010). Limited clinical reasoning skills used by novice physiotherapists when involved in the assessment and management of patients with shoulder problems: A qualitative study. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 18(2), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayer, T., Proctor, T., & Gatchel, R. J. (2002). The million visual analogue scale: Its utility for predicting outcomes after tertiary rehabilitation. The Spine Journal, 2(S1), 15–16.Google Scholar
- Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., et al. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2163–2196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar