Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 269–287 | Cite as

An Examination of the Communication Styles Associated with Psychopathy and Their Influence on Observer Impressions

  • Leanne ten Brinke
  • Stephen Porter
  • Natasha Korva
  • Katherine Fowler
  • Scott O. Lilienfeld
  • Christopher J. Patrick
Original Paper


Psychopathic individuals are characterized as “intra-species predators”—callous, impulsive, aggressive, and proficient at interpersonal manipulation. For example, despite their high risk for re-offending, psychopathic offenders often receive early release on parole. While reputed to be social chameleons, research suggests that even naive observers can accurately infer high levels of psychopathic traits in others with very brief exposures to behavior, but accuracy degrades with extended observation. We utilized a lens model approach to examine the communication styles (emotional facial expressions, body language, and verbal content) of offenders varying in levels of psychopathic traits using “thin slice” video clips of psychological assessment interviews and to reveal which cues observers use to inform their evaluations of psychopathy. Psychopathic traits were associated with more (a) Duchenne smiles, (b) negative (angry) emotional language, and (c) hand gestures (illustrators). Further, psychopathy was associated with a marked behavioral incongruence; when individuals scoring high in psychopathic traits engaged in Duchenne smiles they were also more likely to use angry language. Naïve observers relied on each of these valid behavioral signals to quickly and accurately detect psychopathic traits. These findings provide insight into psychopathic communication styles, opportunities for improving the detection of psychopathic personality traits, and may provide an avenue for understanding successful psychopathic manipulation.


Psychopathy First impressions Communication Nonverbal behavior Lens model 


  1. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits: When psychopaths go to work. New York: Regan Books/Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, P. J., Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (2014). The big bad wolf? The relation between the Dark Triad and the interpersonal assessment of vulnerability. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Book, A., Methot, T., Gauthier, N., Hosker-Field, A., Forth, A., Quinsey, V., et al. (2015). The Mask of Sanity revisited: Psychopathic traits and affective mimicry. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carney, D. R., Colvin, C. R., & Hall, J. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleckley, H. (1946). Psychopath: A problem for society. Federal Probation, 10, 22–25.Google Scholar
  10. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies. New York: Norton. (Original work published 1985).Google Scholar
  13. Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hagar, J. C. (2002). Facial action coding system. Salt Lake City, UT: Network Information Research. (Original work published 1976).Google Scholar
  15. Fowler, K. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Patrick, C. J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21, 68–78. doi: 10.1037/a0014938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowles, D. C., & Dindo, L. (2006). A dual-deficit model of psychopathy. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy (pp. 14–34). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Friesen, W. V., Ekman, P., & Wallbott, H. (1979). Measuring hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillespie, S. M., Rotshtein, P., Wells, L. J., Beech, A. R., & Mitchell, I. J. (2015). Psychopathic traits are associated with reduced attention to the eyes of emotional faces among adult male non-offenders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00552.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillstrom, B. J., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Language-related hand gestures in psychopaths. Journal of Personality Disorders, 2, 21–27. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1988.2.1.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunnery, S. D., Hall, J. A., & Ruben, M. A. (2013). The deliberate Duchenne smile: Individual differences in expressive control. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunnery, S. D., & Ruben, M. A. (2016). Perceptions of Duchenne and non-Duchenne smiles: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 501–515.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Häkkänen-Nyholm, H., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Psychopathy, homicide, and the courts working the system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 761–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hancock, J., Woodworth, M. T., & Porter, S. (2013). Hungry like the wolf: A word pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hare, R. D. (2003). Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  26. Hare, R. D., Clark, D., Grann, M., & Thornton, D. (2000). Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 623–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hare, R. D., Hart, S. D., & Harpur, T. J. (1991). Psychopathy and the DSM-IV criteria for antisocial personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 391–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnston, L., Miles, L., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Why are you smiling at me? Social functions of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 107–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kasl, S. V., & Mahl, G. F. (1965). Relationship of disturbances and hesitations in spontaneous speech to anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 425–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaufmann, G., Drevland, G. C., Wessel, E., Overskeid, G., & Magnussen, S. (2003). The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and witness credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klaver, J. R., Lee, Z., & Hart, S. D. (2007). Psychopathy and nonverbal indicators of deception in offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 337–351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, L. R., & Henson, R. K. (2012). Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(44), 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Krumhuber, E. G., & Manstead, A. S. (2009). Can Duchenne smiles be feigned? New evidence on felt and false smiles. Emotion, 9, 807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lilienfeld, S. O., & Andrews, B. P. (1996). Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 488–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lilienfeld, S. O., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., Berg, J., Sellbom, M., & Edens, J. F. (2012). The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2015). Successful psychopathy A scientific status report. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lynam, D. R., & Miller, J. D. (2012). Fearless dominance and psychopathy: A response to Lilienfeld et al. Personality Disorders: Theory, Treatment, and Research, 3, 241–353.Google Scholar
  40. Oberlander, J., & Gill, A. J. (2006). Language with character: A stratified corpus comparison of individual differences in e-mail communication. Discourse Processes, 42, 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patrick, C. J., & Bernat, E. M. (2009). Neurobiology of psychopathy: A two-process theory. In G. G. Berntson & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences (pp. 1110–1131). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. E., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2007—Operator’s Manual. Austin, TX: Scholar
  44. Pennebaker, J. W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Porter, S., Bhanwer, A., Woodworth, M., & Black, P. J. (2014). Soldiers of misfortune: An examination of the Dark Triad and the experience of schadenfreude. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Porter, S., Doucette, N. L., Woodworth, M., Earle, J., & MacNeil, B. (2008). Halfe the world knowes not how the other halfe lies: Investigation of verbal and non-verbal signs of deception exhibited by criminal offenders and non-offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 27–38. doi: 10.1348/135532507X186653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2008). Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychological Science, 19, 508–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02116.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., Baker, A., & Wallace, B. (2011). Would I lie to you? “Leakage” in deceptive facial expressions relates to psychopathy and emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Wallace, B. (2012). Secrets and lies: Involuntary leakage in deceptive facial expressions as a function of emotional intensity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., & Wilson, K. (2009). Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 109–118. doi: 10.1348/135532508X284310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reynolds, D. J., & Gifford, R. (2001). The sounds and sights of intelligence: A lens model channel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rimé, B., Bouvy, H., Leborgne, B., & Rouillon, F. (1978). Psychopathy and nonverbal behavior in an interpersonal situation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 636–643. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.87.6.636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmid Mast, M. S., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2, 52–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Winston, J. S., Strange, B. A., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 277–283.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne ten Brinke
    • 1
  • Stephen Porter
    • 2
  • Natasha Korva
    • 3
  • Katherine Fowler
    • 4
  • Scott O. Lilienfeld
    • 4
  • Christopher J. Patrick
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada
  3. 3.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Emory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations