Surprising Smiles and Unanticipated Frowns: How Emotion and Status Influence Gender Categorization
- 770 Downloads
Beliefs about who typically expresses which emotions are deeply ingrained and likely affect how people perceive and respond to emotional displays by others. We examined how emotional expressions and social status separately and in combination affect how quickly participants can categorize faces by their gender. The speed with which people categorize targets is informative about what combinations are expected or not. In Study 1, participants categorized the gender of targets displaying angry, happy, and neutral expressions. Response times were slower to incongruent gender-emotion pairs (angry female faces, happy male faces) relative to both neutral and congruent expressions. In Study 2, participants again categorized the gender of targets, this time presented as having high or low status. Target status affected response times to female targets only. Female targets were categorized more slowly when they both had high status and expressed anger (vs. happiness or no emotion). No differences by emotion were found for low-status female targets. In sum, anger was incongruent with women at an automatic level both when they had high status and when their status was unmarked, whereas explicit low-status information eliminated this incongruity. These data confirm the existence of deeply-ingrained associations linking status, gender, and emotion and underscore the importance of emotional expression and status in how women are perceived.
KeywordsGender Emotion Status Facial expressions Stereotypes
- Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 395–408). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Condry, J., & Condry, S. (1976). Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development, 47(3), 812–819.Google Scholar
- Dovidio, J. F., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 204–237). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). The Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Everhart, D. E., & Harrison, D. W. (2000). Facial affect perception in anxious and nonanxious men without depression. Psychobiology, 28(1), 90–98.Google Scholar
- Hess, U., Adams, R. B., Grammer, K., & Kleck, R. E. (2009). Face gender and emotion expression: Are angry women more like men? Journal of Vision, 9(12), 19, 1–8. doi:10.1167/9.12.19.
- Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2011). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0025335.
- LaFrance, M., & Banaji, M. (1992). Toward a reconsideration of the gender-emotion relationship. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 178–201). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 221–234. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<221:AID-JOB36>3.0.CO;2-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maybury, K. K. (1997). The influence of status and sex on observer judgements of anger displays (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis.Google Scholar