Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 115–130 | Cite as

Surprising Smiles and Unanticipated Frowns: How Emotion and Status Influence Gender Categorization

  • Jacqueline S. Smith
  • Marianne LaFrance
  • Kevin H. Knol
  • Donald J. Tellinghuisen
  • Paul Moes
Original Paper

Abstract

Beliefs about who typically expresses which emotions are deeply ingrained and likely affect how people perceive and respond to emotional displays by others. We examined how emotional expressions and social status separately and in combination affect how quickly participants can categorize faces by their gender. The speed with which people categorize targets is informative about what combinations are expected or not. In Study 1, participants categorized the gender of targets displaying angry, happy, and neutral expressions. Response times were slower to incongruent gender-emotion pairs (angry female faces, happy male faces) relative to both neutral and congruent expressions. In Study 2, participants again categorized the gender of targets, this time presented as having high or low status. Target status affected response times to female targets only. Female targets were categorized more slowly when they both had high status and expressed anger (vs. happiness or no emotion). No differences by emotion were found for low-status female targets. In sum, anger was incongruent with women at an automatic level both when they had high status and when their status was unmarked, whereas explicit low-status information eliminated this incongruity. These data confirm the existence of deeply-ingrained associations linking status, gender, and emotion and underscore the importance of emotional expression and status in how women are perceived.

Keywords

Gender Emotion Status Facial expressions Stereotypes 

References

  1. Algoe, S. B., Buswell, B. N., & DeLamater, J. D. (2000). Gender and job status as contextual cues for the interpretation of facial expression of emotion. Sex Roles, 42(3), 183–208. doi:10.1023/A:1007087106159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, D. V., Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Blackwell, K. C., & Smith, D. M. (2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 179–190. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijlstra, G., Holland, R. W., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010). The social face of emotion recognition: Evaluations versus stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 657–663. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (Vol. 3, pp. 395–408). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, L. R., Lovas, G. S., & Hay, D. H. (1995). Gender differences in anger and fear as a function of situational context. Sex Roles, 32(1–2), 47–48. doi:10.1007/BF01544757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carney, D., Hall, J. A., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 105–123. doi:10.1007/s10919-005-2743-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Condry, J., & Condry, S. (1976). Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development, 47(3), 812–819.Google Scholar
  9. Dépret, E., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(5), 461–480. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dovidio, J. F., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 204–237). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). The Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  15. Everhart, D. E., & Harrison, D. W. (2000). Facial affect perception in anxious and nonanxious men without depression. Psychobiology, 28(1), 90–98.Google Scholar
  16. Fabes, R. A., & Martin, C. L. (1991). Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 532. doi:10.1177/0146167291175008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & Smith LeBeau, L. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hecht, M. A., & LaFrance, M. (1998). License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1332. doi:10.1177/01461672982412007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hess, U., Senécal, S., Kirouac, G., Herrera, P., Philippot, P., & Kleck, R. E. (2000). Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Cognition and Emotion, 14(5), 609–642. doi:10.1080/02699930050117648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hess, U., Adams, R. B., Grammer, K., & Kleck, R. E. (2009). Face gender and emotion expression: Are angry women more like men? Journal of Vision, 9(12), 19, 1–8. doi:10.1167/9.12.19.
  22. Hugenberg, K. (2005). Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: Target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. Emotion, 5(3), 267–276. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hugenberg, K., & Sczesny, S. (2006). On wonderful women and seeing smiles: Social categorization moderates the happy face response latency advantage. Social Cognition, 24(5), 516–539. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2011). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0025335.
  25. Kring, A. M. (2000). Gender and anger. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 211–231). Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LaFrance, M., & Banaji, M. (1992). Toward a reconsideration of the gender-emotion relationship. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior (pp. 178–201). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. LaFrance, M., Hecht, M. A., & Paluck, E. L. (2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 305–334. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 221–234. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<221:AID-JOB36>3.0.CO;2-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. doi:10.1177/0146167207311910.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maybury, K. K. (1997). The influence of status and sex on observer judgements of anger displays (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  32. Moretti, M. M., Charlton, S., & Taylor, S. (1996). The effects of hemispheric asymmetries and depression on the perception of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 32(1), 67–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Plant, E. A., Hyde, J. S., Keltner, D., & Devine, P. G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 81–92. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01024.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Plant, E. A., Kling, K. C., & Smith, G. L. (2004). The influence of gender and social role on the interpretation of facial expressions. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 187–196. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000037762.10349.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ratcliff, N. J., Franklin, R. G, Jr, Nelson, A. J., & Vescio, T. K. (2012). The scorn of status: A bias toward perceiving anger on high-status faces. Social Cognition, 30(5), 631–642. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.5.631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rotter, N. G., & Rotter, G. S. (1988). Sex differences in the encoding and decoding of negative facial emotions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stroessner, S. J. (1996). Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social Cognition, 14(3), 247–276. doi:10.1521/soco.1996.14.3.247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas, E. L., Dovidio, J. F., & West, T. V. (2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 370–376. doi:10.1037/a0035096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Sentimental stereotypes: Emotional expectations for high- and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(5), 560. doi:10.1177/0146167200267004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline S. Smith
    • 1
  • Marianne LaFrance
    • 1
  • Kevin H. Knol
    • 2
  • Donald J. Tellinghuisen
    • 2
  • Paul Moes
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCalvin CollegeGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations