The Expression of Victory and Loss: Estimating Who’s Leading or Trailing from Nonverbal Cues in Sports
- 2k Downloads
The goal of the paper was to test if humans can detect whether athletes are trailing or leading in sports based on the perception of thin slices of athletes’ nonverbal behavior. In Experiment 1, participants who were unexperienced in the respective sports watched short videos depicting basketball and table tennis players and rated whether athletes were trailing or leading. Results indicated that participants could significantly differentiate between trailing and leading athletes in both team and individual sports. Experiment 2 showed that children were also able to distinguish between trailing and leading athletes based on nonverbal behavior. Comparison with the adult results from Experiment 1 revealed that the adult ratings corresponded to a higher degree with the actual scores during the game compared to the children’s. In Experiment 3, we replicated the findings from Experiment 1 with both expert and unexperienced participants and a different set of stimuli from team handball. Both experts and unexpert participants were able to differentiate between leading and trailing athletes. Our findings are in line with evolutionary accounts of nonverbal behavior and suggest that humans display nonverbal signals as a consequence of leading or trailing which are reliably interpreted by others. By comparing this effect as a function of different age groups we provide evidence that although even young children can differentiate between leading and trailing athletes, the decoding of subtle nonverbal cues continues to develop with increasing experience and maturation processes.
KeywordsSport Emotion expression Nonverbal behavior Thin slices Development
Special thanks go to Manuel Thiel, Christoph Haberl, Christoph Sobotta, and Wolfgang Walther for helping with the data collection and programming in this study. Further we would like to thank William D. Furley for copy editing the manuscript.
- Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 344–390). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Clark-Carter, D. (1997). Doing quantitative psychological research: From design to report. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.Google Scholar
- de Waal, F. (1998). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
- Furley, P., & Dicks, M. (2012). “Hold your head high”. The influence of emotional versus neutral nonverbal expressions of dominance and submissiveness in baseball. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43, 294–311.Google Scholar
- Greenlees, I. A., Buscombe, R., Thelwell, R. C., Holder, T. P., & Rimmer, M. (2005b). Impact of opponents’ clothing and body language on impression formation and outcome expectations. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27, 39–52.Google Scholar