Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 107–127 | Cite as

The Perception and Parameters of Intentional Voice Manipulation

  • Susan M. Hughes
  • Justin K. Mogilski
  • Marissa A. Harrison
Original Paper

Abstract

Evidence suggests that people can manipulate their vocal intonations to convey a host of emotional, trait, and situational images. We asked 40 participants (20 men and 20 women) to intentionally manipulate the sound of their voices in order to portray four traits: attractiveness, confidence, dominance, and intelligence to compare these samples to their normal speech. We then asked independent raters of the same- and opposite-sex to assess the degree to which each voice sample projected the given trait. Women’s manipulated voices were judged as sounding more attractive than their normal voices, but this was not the case for men. In contrast, men’s manipulated voices were rated by women as sounding more confident than their normal speech, but this did not hold true for women’s voices. Further, women were able to manipulate their voices to sound just as dominant as the men’s manipulated voices, and both sexes were able to modify their voices to sound more intelligent than their normal voice. We also assessed all voice samples objectively using spectrogram analyses and several vocal patterns emerged for each trait; among them we found that when trying to sound sexy/attractive, both sexes slowed their speech and women lowered their pitch and had greater vocal hoarseness. Both sexes raised their pitch and spoke louder to sound dominant and women had less vocal hoarseness. These findings are discussed using an evolutionary perspective and implicate voice modification as an important, deliberate aspect of communication, especially in the realm of mate selection and competition.

Keywords

Voice manipulation Voice attractiveness Voice pitch Dominance Intelligence Confidence 

References

  1. Amir, O., & Biron-Shental, T. (2004). The impact of hormonal fluctuations on female vocal folds. Current Otolaryngological Head and Neck Surgery, 12, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anolli, L., & Ciceri, R. (2002). Analysis of the vocal profiles of male seduction: From exhibition to self-disclosure. Journal of General Psychology, 129, 149–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., Feinberg, D. R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers. Biology Letters, 3, 682–684.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apple, W., Streeter, L. A., & Krauss, R. M. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkowska, B., & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. Animal Behaviour, 82, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody, L., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 447–460). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J., & Rencher, A. C. (1973). Perceptions of personality from acoustic speech: Effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(1), 29–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J., & Rencher, A. C. (1974). Fifty-four voices from two: The effects of simultaneous manipulations of rate, mean fundamental frequency, and variance of fundamental frequency on ratings of personality from speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(2), 313–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002). What’s new, pussycat? Talking to babies and animals. Science, 296(5572), 1435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intra sexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buss, D. M. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. L. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, R. S., and Garcia, J. R. (2011). Behind closed doors: On the use of loverese and pet-names between romantic partners. Poster session presented at the Annual Conferences of the Northeast Evolutionary Society, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1994). Developmental differences in infant attention to the spectral properties of infant-directed speech. Child Development, 65, 1663–1677.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dabbs, J. M., & Mallinger, A. (1999). High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2001). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking nature of a rival’s body build. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(5), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1976). Body movements and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, S., Neave, N., & Wakelin, D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology, 72, 160–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farley, S. D., Hughes, S. M., & LaFayette, J. N. (2013). People will know we are in love: Evidence of differences between vocal samples directed toward lovers and friends. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37(3), 123–138. doi:10.1007/s10919-013-0151-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37, 615–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernald, A. (1985). Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernald, A., & Kuhl, P. (1987). Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 10(3), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher, M., Cox, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). Self-promotion versus competitor derogation: The influence of sex and romantic relationship status on intra sexual competition strategy selection. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fitch, W. T., & Hauser, M. D. (1995). Vocal production in nonhuman primates: Acoustic, physiology, and functional constraints on ‘honest’ advertisement. American Journal of Primatology, 37, 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Floyd, K., & Ray, G. B. (2003). Human affection exchange: IV: Vocalic predictors of perceived affection in initial interactions. Western Journal of Communication, 67(1), 56–73.Google Scholar
  30. Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hall, J. A., & Braunwald, K. G. (1981). Gender cues in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, S. M., Dispenza, F., & Gallup Jr, G. G. (2004). Ratings of voice attractiveness predict sexual behavior and body configuration. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, S. M., Farley, S. D., & Rhodes, B. C. (2010). Vocal and physiological changes in response to the physical attractiveness of conversational partners. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A., & Gallup Jr, G. G. (2002). The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, S. M., Pastizzo, M. J., & Gallup Jr, G. G. (2008). The sound of symmetry revisited: Subjective and objective analyses of voice. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, S., & Rhodes, B. C. (2010). Making age assessments based on voice: The impact of the reproductive viability of the speaker. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jansz, J. (2000). Masculine identity and restrictive emotionality. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 166–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiang, J., Lin, E., Wang, J., & Hanson, D. G. (1999). Glottographic measures before and after levodopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease. Laryngoscope, 109, 1287–1293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgments of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karpf, A. (2006). The human voice. New York: Bloombury.Google Scholar
  43. Kimble, C. E., & Seidel, S. D. (1991). Vocal signs of confidence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kitamura, C., Thanavisuth, C., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2002). Universal pitch modifications in infant directed speech: A prelinguistic longitudinal study in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development, 24(4), 372–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klofstad, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Peters, S. (2012). Sound like a winner: Voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 279(1738), 2698–2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krauss, R. M., Freyberg, R., & Morsella, E. (2002). Inferring speakers’ physical attributes from their voices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 618–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luxen, M. F., & Buunk, B. P. (2006). Human intelligence, fluctuating asymmetry and the peacock’s tail: General intelligence as an honest signal of fitness. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 897–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Montepare, J. M., & Vega, C. (1988). Women’s vocal reactions to intimate and casual male friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Connor, J. J. M., & Feinberg, D. R. (2012). The influence of facial masculinity and voice pitch on jealousy and perceptions of intra sexual rivalry. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oguchi, T., & Kikuchi, H. (1997). Voice and interpersonal attraction. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pipitone, R. N., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2008). Women’s attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prato-Previde, E., Fallani, G., & Valsecchi, P. (2006). Gender differences in owners interacting with pet dogs: An observational study. Ethology, 112(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prokosch, M. D., Coss, R. G., Scheib, J. E., & Blozis, S. A. (2009). Intelligence and mate choice: Intelligent men are always appealing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prokosch, M. D., Yeo, R. A., & Miller, G. F. (2005). Intelligence tests with higher g-loadings show higher correlations with body symmetry: Evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability. Intelligence, 33, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cardenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 340–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roux, A., & Bergman, T. J. (2012). Indirect rival assessment in a social primate Theropithecus gelada. Animal Behaviour, 83(1), 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rucas, S. L., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., Winking, J., Gangestad, S., & Crespo, M. (2006). Female intra sexual competition and reputational effects on attractiveness among Tsimane of Bolivia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saxton, T. K., Burriss, R. P., Murray, A. K., Rowland, H. M., & Roberts, C. (2009). Face, body and speech cues independently predict judgments of attractiveness. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scherer, K. R. (1995). Expression of emotion in voice and music. Journal of Voice, 9(3), 235–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schieb, J. E., Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sell, A., Bryant, G. A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., et al. (2010). Adaptations in humans for assessing physical strength from the voice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 3509–3518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shao, J., MacCallum, J. K., Zhang, Y., Sprecher, A., & Liang, J. J. (2010). Acoustic analysis of the tremulous voice: Assessing the utility of the correlation dimension and perturbation parameters. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 35–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sprecher, S. (1989). The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential and expressiveness in initial attraction. Sex Roles, 21, 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steckler, N. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Sex differences in nonverbal and verbal communication with bosses, peers, and subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V. J., Olson, C. T., & Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Touhey, J. C. (1974). Effects of dominance and competence on heterosexual attraction. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tuomi, S. K., & Fisher, J. E. (1979). Characteristics of a simulated sexy voice. Folia Phoniatrica, 31, 242–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tusing, K. J., & Dillard, J. P. (2000). The sounds of dominance: Vocal precursors of perceived dominance during interpersonal influence. Human Communication Research, 26, 148–171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Hughes
    • 1
  • Justin K. Mogilski
    • 2
  • Marissa A. Harrison
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAlbright CollegeReadingUSA
  2. 2.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Penn State HarrisburgMiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations