Competent and Warm but Unemotional: The Influence of Occupational Stereotypes on the Attribution of Emotions
- 642 Downloads
The present research aims to assess how occupational stereotypes, and in particular, stereotypes about doctors, influence the observers’ perception of the emotions expressed by members of this group. For this, 60 men and women judged the emotions of women who expressed either happiness, anger, sadness, or a neutral expression and whose faces were either uncovered or covered with a surgical mask, a niqab, or a hat and scarf such that only an identical portion of the face around the eyes was visible. Congruent with the occupational stereotype, women dressed as doctors were perceived highest on competence and warmth, but also as emotionally restrained such that they were rated as experiencing lower levels of emotions relative to the same women wearing other face covers or with uncovered faces.
KeywordsOccupational stereotypes Facial expressions Emotion perception
- Bogart, L. M., Bird, S. T., Walt, L. C., Delahanty, D. L., & Figler, J. L. (2004). Association of stereotypes about physicians to health care satisfaction, help-seeking behavior, and adherence to treatment. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 1049–1058. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00277-6.
- Buck, R. (1984). Nonverbal receiving ability. In R. Buck (Ed.), The communication of emotion (pp. 209–242). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In P. Z. Mark (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Kirouac, G., & Hess, U. (1999). Group membership and the decoding of nonverbal behavior. In P. Philippot, R. Feldman, & E. Coats (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior (pp. 182–210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar