People Will Know We Are in Love: Evidence of Differences Between Vocal Samples Directed Toward Lovers and Friends
- 1.6k Downloads
Research has documented the tendency for individuals to change their voices as a function of different emotional and motivational states, but little attention has been devoted to examining voice modulation in romantic relationships. The present research was conducted to determine (1) the way in which individuals alter their voices when speaking to romantic partners versus friends and (2) if independent raters perceive these differences. Independent raters (N = 80) listened to vocal clips obtained from telephone calls directed toward close same-sex friends and romantic partners. For several clips, raters were able to identify conversational partner (romantic versus friend) with greater than chance accuracy, and this accuracy was positively correlated with vocal pitch and perceived romantic interest. In addition, raters who listened to content-filtered clips judged callers less favorably when talking to their romantic partners than their friends. Results are interpreted in light of the “longing” but vulnerable condition of intense romantic love, and integrated into affection exchange theory and communication accommodation theory.
KeywordsVoice Affect expression Romantic love Vocal accommodation theory Paralanguage
The authors would like to thank Judy Hall and Miles Patterson for their guidance on earlier versions of this manuscript, and Lisa Stickney for her assistance with Visio. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sally Farley.
- Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. J. M. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.08). Retrieved April 15, 2009, from http://www.praat.org/.
- Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2010). Nonverbal communication. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Chartrand, T., & Dalton, A. N. (2009). Mimicry: Its ubiquity, importance, and functionality. In E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, P. M. Gollwitzer, E. Morsella, J. A. Bargh, & P. M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action (pp. 458–483). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fisher, H. (2000). Lust, attraction, attachment: Biology and evolution of the three primary emotion systems for mating, reproduction, and parenting. Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 25(1), 96–104.Google Scholar
- Fisher, H. (2006). The drive to love: The neural mechanism for mate selection. In R. J. Sternberg, K. Weis, R. J. Sternberg, & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 87–115). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Floyd, K., Judd, J., & Hesse, C. (2008). Affection exchange theory. In L. A. Baxter, D. O. Braithewaite, L. A. Baxter, & D. O. Braithewaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 285–293). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Floyd, K., & Ray, G. B. (2003). Human affection exchange: IV, Vocalic predictors of perceived affection in initial interactions. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 56–73.Google Scholar
- Gifford, R. (2006). Personality and nonverbal behavior: A complex conundrum. In V. Manusov & M. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 159–179). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Giles, H. (2008). Communication accommodation theory. In L. A. Baxter, D. O. Braithewaite, L. A. Baxter, & D. O. Braithewaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 161–173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Koeppel, L. B., Montagne-Miller, Y., O’Hair, D., & Cody, M. J. (1993). Friendly? Flirting? Wrong? In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 13–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Waller, W. W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar