Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 79–93 | Cite as

Acting Gay: Male Actors Shift the Frequency Components of Their Voices Towards Female Values When Playing Homosexual Characters

  • Valentina Cartei
  • David Reby
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether actors playing homosexual male characters in North-American television shows speak with a feminized voice, thus following longstanding stereotypes that attribute feminine characteristics to male homosexuals. We predicted that when playing homosexual characters, actors would raise the frequency components of their voice towards more stereotypically feminine values. This study compares fundamental frequency (F0) and formant frequencies (F i ) parameters in the speech of fifteen actors playing homosexual and heterosexual characters in North-American television shows. Our results reveal that the voices of actors playing homosexual male characters are characterized by a raised F0 (corresponding to a higher pitch), and raised formant frequencies (corresponding to a less baritone timbre), approaching values typical of female voices. Besides providing further evidence of the existence of an “effeminacy” stereotype in portraying male homosexuals in the media, these results show that actors perform pitch and vocal tract length adjustments in order to alter their perceived sexual orientation, emphasizing the role of these frequency components in the behavioral expression of gender attributes in the human voice.

Keywords

Voice Formant frequency Fundamental frequency Gender Sexual orientation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Karen McComb and Robin Banerjee for their helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper.

References

  1. Audibert, N., Aubergé, V., & Rilliard, A. (2010). Prosodic correlates of acted vs. spontaneous discrimination of expressive speech: a pilot study. In Proceedings from 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody. Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Avery, J. D., & Liss, J. M. (1994). Acoustic characteristics of less-masculine-sounding male speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3738–3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battles, G. K., & Hilton-Morrow, W. (2002). Gay characters in conventional spaces: Will and Grace and the situation comedy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blashill, A. J., & Powlishta, K. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61, 783–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.19) [Computer program]. Retrieved from: http://www.praat.org.
  6. Busby, P., & Plant, G. (1995). Formant frequency values of vowels produced by preadolescent boys and girls. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2603–2606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chuenwattanapranithi, S., Xu, Y., Thipakorn, B., & Maneewongvatana, S. (2006). Expressing anger and joy with the size code.In Proceedings of Speech Prosody. Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
  8. Chuenwattanapranithi, S., Xu, Y., Thipakorn, B., & Maneewongvatana, S. (2008). Encoding emotions in speech with the size code: A perceptual investigation. Phonetica, 65, 210–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chung, S. K. (2007). Media literacy art education: Deconstructing lesbian and gay stereotypes in the media. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 26, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clopper, C., Pisoni, D. B., & Jong, K. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1661–1676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costanzo, F. S., Markel, N. N., & Costanzo, P. R. (1969). Voice quality profile and perceived emotion. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 16, 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, M. S. (1987). Acoustically mediated neighbor recognition in the North-American bullfrog, Rana-Catesbeiana. Behavioral Ecolology and Sociobiology, 21, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devillers, L., & Vasilescu, I. (2003). Prosodic cues for emotion characterization in real-life spoken dialogs. In Proceedings of Eurospeech (pp. 189–192).Google Scholar
  14. Dow, B. (2001). Television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drahota, A., Costall, A., & Reddy, V. (2008). The vocal communication of different kinds of smile. Speech Communication, 50, 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagel, S. (2010). Effect of smiled speech on lips, larynx and acoustics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5967, 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69, 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitch, W., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1511–1522.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitch, W. T., & Reby, D. (2001). The descended larynx is not uniquely human. In Proceedings of the Royal Society. London, UK: Royal Society Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Frick, R. W. (1986). The prosodic expression of anger: Differentiating threat and frustration. Aggressive Behavior, 12, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaudio, R. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech, 96, 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hajek, C., & Howard, G. (2005). Intergroup communication schemas: Cognitive representations of talk with gay men. Language & Communication, 25, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henton, C. G. (1989). Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language & Communication, 9, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henton, C. G. (1995). Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language & Communication, 15, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Human Nature, 21, 406–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hollien, H., Green, R., & Massey, K. (1994). Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in males. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2646–2654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, W. F., Emde, R. N., Scherer, K. R., & Klinnert, M. D. (1986). Recognition of emotion from vocal cues. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 280–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kienast, M., & Sendlmeier, W. F. (2000). Acoustical analysis of spectral and temporal changes in emotional speech. In Proceedings from the ISCA ITRW on Speech and Emotion. Newcastle, UK: Textflow.Google Scholar
  31. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ko, S. J., Judd, C. M., & Blair, I. V. (2006). What the voice reveals: Within- and between-category stereotyping on the basis of voice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 806–819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lasarcyk, E., & Trouvain, J. (2003). Spread lips + raised larynx + higher F0 = smiled speech?: An articulatory synthesis approach. In Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production. Strasbourg, France: INRIA.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, S., Potamianos, A., & Narayanan, S. (1999). Acoustics of children’s speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1455–1468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Linneman, T. J. (2008). How do you solve a problem like Will Truman? The feminization of gay masculinities on Will and Grace. Men and Masculinities, 10, 583–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopez, P. T., Narins, P. M., Lewis, E. R., & Moore, S. W. (1988). Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog, Leptodactylus albilabris. Animal Behavior, 36, 1295–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mattingly, I. G. (1966). Speaker variation and vocal-tract Size (A). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 1219(A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munson, B., & Babel, M. (2007). Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 416–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Munson, B., McDonald, E., & DeBoe, N. (2006). The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 202–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L. (1993). Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 93, 1097–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perry, T., Ohde, R., & Ashmead, D. (2001). The acoustic bases for gender identification from children’s voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2988–2998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pierrehumbert, J., Bent, T., & Munson, B. (2004). The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production (L). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1905–1908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pisanski, K., & Rendall, D. (2011). The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners’ assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, 2201–2212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plant, R. L., & Younger, R. M. (2000). The interrelationship of subglottic air pressure, fundamental frequency, and vocal intensity during speech. Journal of Voice, 14, 170–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Puts, D., Gaulin, S., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 340–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raley, A. B., & Lucas, L. J. (2006). Stereotype or success? Prime-time television’s portrayals of gay male, lesbian, and bisexual characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 19–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reby, D., & McComb, K. (2003). Anatomical constraints generate honesty: Acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behavior, 65, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reby, D., McComb, K., Cargnelutti, B., Darwin, C., & Fitch, W. T. (2005). Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. London: Proceedings of the Royal Society, Royal Society Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Rendall, D., Kollias, S., Ney, C., & Lloyd, P. (2005). Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: The role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 944–955.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rendall, D., Vasey, P., & McKenzie, J. (2008). The Queen’s english: An alternative, biosocial hypothesis for the distinctive features of “gay speech”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 188–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Riordan, C. J. (1977). Control of vocal-tract length in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 998–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sachs, J., Lieberman, P., & Erikson, D. (1973). Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. In R. W. Shuy & R. W. Fasold (Eds.), Language attitudes (pp. 74–84). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson, A. P. (2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, D. R. R., & Patterson, R. D. (2005). The interaction of glottal-pulse rate and vocal-tract length in judgments of speaker size, sex, and age. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3177–3186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smyth, R., Jacobs, G., & Rogers, H. (2003). Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society, 32, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Staats, G. R. (1978). Stereotype content and social distance: Changing views of homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 4, 15–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sundberg, J., & Nordstrom, P. E. (1976). Raised and lowered larynx: The effect on vowel formant frequencies. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress, 17, 35–39.Google Scholar
  61. Tartter, V. C. (1980). Happy talk: Perceptual and acoustic effects of smiling on speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Terengo, L. (1966). Pitch and duration characteristics of the oral reading of males on a masculinity-femininity dimension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 9, 590–595.Google Scholar
  63. Thomas, E. R. (2003). Secrets revealed by southern vowel shifting. American Speech, 78, 150–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Titze, I. R. (1994). Principles of voice production. Iowa City: IA7 National Center for Voice and Speech.Google Scholar
  65. Tivoli, M., & Gordon, M. J. (2008). The [+ spread] of the Northern Cities Shift. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. (Vol. 14, pp. 111–120).Google Scholar
  66. Tom, K., Titze, I. R., & Hoffman, E. A. (2001). Three-dimensional vocal tract imaging and formant structure: Varying vocal register, pitch, and loudness. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 109, 742–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vorperian, H. K., & Kent, R. D. (2007). Vowel acoustic space development in children: A synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1510–1545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vorperian, H. K., Kent, R. D., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2005). Development of vocal tract length during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 338–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wolfe, V. I., Ratusnik, D. L., Smith, F. H., & Northrop, G. (1990). Intonation and fundamental frequency in male-to-female transsexual. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 55, 43–50.Google Scholar
  70. Wondershare Software Co. Ltd. (2010). iSkysoft Audio Ripper (Version 1.8.2.7) [Computer program]. Retrieved from: http://www.iskysoft.com.
  71. Wyatt, D. A. (2008). Gay/lesbian/bisexual television characters. [Website] Retrieved from: http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~wyatt/tv-characters.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SussexFalmerUK

Personalised recommendations