Touch, Compliance, and Homophobia
- 567 Downloads
As has already been indicated in numerous studies, touching or holding someone by the arm while asking for something increases our chances of having our request fulfilled. However, the three experiments presented in this article which were conducted in Poland, indicate that in the conditions when a man requests something from another man, touch actually negatively affects the chances for request fulfillment. This effect seems to be linked to the strong male homophobia characteristic of the society within which the experiments were carried out.
KeywordsCompliance Social influence Nonverbal behavior Touch Homophobia
- Abramowicz, M. (Ed.). (2007). Sytuacja społeczna osób biseksualnych i homoseksualnych wPolsce (Social situation of bisexual and homosexual persons in Poland). Warszawa: Lambda.Google Scholar
- Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1989). Avoiding communication: Verbal and nonverbal dimensions of defensiveness. In Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the Western Speech Communication Association, Spokane, WA. Google Scholar
- Andersen, P. A., Lustig, M. W., & Andersen, J. F. (1987b). Changes in latitude, changes in attitude: The relationship between climate and interpersonal communication predispositions. In Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the Western Speech Communication Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- European Parliament Resolution of 26 April 2007 on homophobia in Europe (2007). Retrieved July 21, 2009 from http://www.ilga.org/news_results.asp?FileID=736.
- Fundamental Right Agency (2009). Homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in the EU member states. Part II—the social situation. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights report. Retrieved July 21, 2009 from http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/FRA_hdgso_report_Part2_en.pdf.
- Goldman, M., Kiyohara, O., & Pfannensteil, D. A. (2001). Interpersonal touch, social labeling, and the foot-in-the-door effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 143–147.Google Scholar
- Guéguen, N. (2002a). Status, apparel and touch: Their joint effects on compliance to a request. American Journal of Psychology, 4, 279–286.Google Scholar
- Guéguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2006). The effect of tactile stimulation on the purchasing behaviour of consumers: An experimental study in natural setting. International Journal of Management, 23, 24–33.Google Scholar
- Henley, N., & LaFrance, M. (1984). Gender and culture: Difference and dominance in nonverbal behavior. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights (pp. 351–357). Ashland: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
- Herek, G. M. (1998). Attitudes toward lesbian and gay men scale. In C. M. Davis (Ed.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 392–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hornik, J. (2001). The effect of touch and gaze upon compliance and interest of interviewees. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 681–683.Google Scholar
- Lelleri, R. (2007). Schoolmates. Transnational research: Final report. Unpublished manuscript. Bologna (Italy).Google Scholar
- Powell, J., Meil, W., Patterson, M. L., & Chouirand, E. F. (1994). Effects of timing of touch on compliance to a request. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 153–162.Google Scholar
- Remland, M. S., & Jones, T. S. (1994). The influence of vocal intensity and touch on compliance gaining. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 89–97.Google Scholar
- Wallace, J., & Sadalla, E. (1966). Behavioral consequences of transgression: I. The effects of social recognition. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 187–194.Google Scholar