Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 169–178

The Semantic Specificity Hypothesis: When Gestures Do Not Depend Upon the Presence of a Listener

Original Paper

Abstract

Humans gesture even when their gestures can serve no communicative function (e.g., when the listener cannot see them). This study explores the intrapersonal function of gestures, and the semantic content of the speech they accompany. Sixty-eight adults participated in pairs, communicating on an object description task. Visibility of partner was manipulated; participants completed half the task behind a screen. Participants produced iconic gestures significantly more for praxic items (i.e., items with physically manipulable properties) than non-praxic items, regardless of visibility of partner. These findings support the semantic specificity hypothesis, whereby a gesture is integrally associated with the semantic properties of the word it accompanies. Where those semantic properties include a high motor component the likelihood of a gesture being produced is increased, irrespective of communication demands.

Keywords

Gesture Semantics Communication 

References

  1. Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, E., & Dick, F. (2002). Language, gesture and the developing brain. Developing Psychobiology, 40, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Do iconic gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? Semiotica, 123, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2002). What properties of talk are associated with the production of spontaneous iconic hand gestures? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 403–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chawla, P., & Krauss, R. M. (1994). Gesture and speech in spontaneous and rehearsed narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 580–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 23, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedman, N. (1977). Hands, words, and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal representation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures: A psychoanalytic interpretation of communication (pp. 109–132). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, N., van Meel, J., Barroso, F., & Bucci, W. (1986). On the development of communicative competence. Semiotica, 62, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frick-Horbury, D., & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gentilucci, M., & Dalla Volta, R. (2008). Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 944–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453–467.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–228). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  15. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gestures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2004). The role of gestures in spatial working memory and speech. The American Journal of Psychology, 34, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morsella, E., & Krauss, R. M. (2005). Muscular activity in the arm during lexical retrieval: Implications for gesture-speech theories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 415–427.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozyurek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture and conceptualisations. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Petitto, L. A., Holowka, S., Sergio, L. E., & Ostry, D. (2001). Language rhythms in baby hand movements. Nature, 413, 35–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pine, K. J., Bird, H., & Kirk, E. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gesture on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 10, 747–754.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rausher, F., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2001). The differential facilitatory effects of gesture and visualisation processes on object naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 977–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weisberg, J., van Tourennout, M., & Martin, A. (2007). A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 513–521.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wesp, R., Hesse, J., & Keutmann, D. (2001). Gestures maintain spatial imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Willems, R. M., & Hagoot, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture and action: A review. Brain and Language, 101, 278–289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen J. Pine
    • 1
  • Daniel J. Gurney
    • 1
  • Ben Fletcher
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations