The Semantic Specificity Hypothesis: When Gestures Do Not Depend Upon the Presence of a Listener
- 393 Downloads
Humans gesture even when their gestures can serve no communicative function (e.g., when the listener cannot see them). This study explores the intrapersonal function of gestures, and the semantic content of the speech they accompany. Sixty-eight adults participated in pairs, communicating on an object description task. Visibility of partner was manipulated; participants completed half the task behind a screen. Participants produced iconic gestures significantly more for praxic items (i.e., items with physically manipulable properties) than non-praxic items, regardless of visibility of partner. These findings support the semantic specificity hypothesis, whereby a gesture is integrally associated with the semantic properties of the word it accompanies. Where those semantic properties include a high motor component the likelihood of a gesture being produced is increased, irrespective of communication demands.
KeywordsGesture Semantics Communication
- Freedman, N. (1977). Hands, words, and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal representation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures: A psychoanalytic interpretation of communication (pp. 109–132). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), Relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–228). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
- Ozyurek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture and conceptualisations. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar