Looking at the Audience Improves Music Appreciation

  • Alessandro AntoniettiEmail author
  • Daniela Cocomazzi
  • Paola Iannello
Original Paper


The establishment of eye contact between a musician and his or her listeners, and its influence on musical perception, has been neglected by musical performance research. Two experiments were conducted to verify the hypothesis that increased eye contact between musician and audience leads the latter to better appreciate the music performed by the former. In the first experiment a musician played and sang three pieces, whereas in the second study he played without vocal support. The results of both experiments showed that directing the musicians’ gaze toward the audience enhanced the qualities of the musical experience.


Eye contact Musical gesture Music perception Emotional response 


  1. Anderson, N. R. (1991). Decision making in the graduate selection interview: An experimental investigation. Human Relations, 44(4), 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Small Waters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (1983). The psychology of interpersonal behaviour (4th ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Bayliss, A. P., di Pellegrino, G., & Tipper, S. P. (2004). Orienting of attention via observed eye gaze is head-centred. Cognition, 94, B1–B10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Child, I. (1962). Personal preferences as an expression of aesthetic sensitivity. Journal of Personality, 30, 496–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl, S., & Friberg, A. (2003). What can the body movements reveal about a musician’s emotional intention? In Proceeding of the Stockholm Music Acoustic Conference, Stockholm, pp 599–602.Google Scholar
  8. Dalhaus, C., & Eggelbrecht, H. H. (1985). Was ist musik?. Wilhelmhaven: Heinrichshoken’s Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, J. W. (1994). What type of information is conveyed in the body movements of solo musician performers? Journal of Human Movement Studies, 6, 279–301.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, J. W. (1995). What does the visual information contained in music performances offer the observer? Some preliminary thoughts. In R. Steinberg (Ed.), Music and the mind machine: Psychophysiology and psychopathology of the sense of music (pp. 105–114). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, J. W. (2001). The role of the body in the production and perception of solo vocal performance: A case study of Annie Lennox. Musicae Scientiae, 5(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
  12. De Nora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ellsworth, P. C., & Langer, E. J. (1976). Staring and approach: An interpretation of the stare as a nonspecific activator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Exline, R. V. (1971). Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference. In J. K. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (19th ed., pp. 162–205). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, N. H. (2004). Aesthetic judgment and reasoning. In E. Eisner & M. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 815–828). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fry, R., & Smith, G. F. (1975). The effect of feedback and eye contact on performance of a digit-coding task. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 145–146.Google Scholar
  18. Fullwood, C. (2007). The effect of mediation on impression formation: A comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 38, 267–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fullwood, C., & Doherty-Sneddon, G. (2006). Effect of gazing at the camera during a video link on recall. Applied Ergonomics, 37(2), 167–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. George, N., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Seen gaze-direction modulates fusiform activity and its coupling with other brain areas during face processing. NeuroImage, 13, 1102–1112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grewe, O., Nagel, F., Kopiez, R., & Altenmüller, E. (2007). Emotions over time: Synchronicity and development of subjective, physiological, and facial affective reactions to music. Emotion, 7(4), 774–788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effect of immediacy on recall of I information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleck, R., & Nuessle, W. (1968). Congruence between the indicative and communicative functions of eye contact in interpersonal relations. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 241–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurosawa, K., & Davidson, J. W. (2005). Nonverbal behaviours in popular music performance: A case study of The Corrs. Musicae Scientiae, 9, 111–133.Google Scholar
  27. Langton, S. R. H., Watt, R. J., & Bruce, V. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsen, R. J., & Shackelford, T. K. (1996). Gaze avoidance: Personality and social judgments of people who avoid direct face-to-face contact. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(6), 907–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modelling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason, M. F., Tatkow, E. P., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The look of love: Gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 16(3), 236–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for research. Journal of Management, 20, 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mehrabrian, A., & Williams, M. (1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nichols, K., & Champness, B. (1971). Eye gaze and the GSR. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohgushi, K. (2006). Interaction between auditory and visual information in conveyance of players’ intentions. Acoustic Science and Technology, 27, 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ohgushi, K., & Hattori, M. (1996). Emotional communication in performance of vocal music. Interaction between auditory and visual information. In B. Pennycook & E. Costa-Giomi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Montreal, pp 269–274.Google Scholar
  36. Ohgushi, K., & Sakuma, M. (1997). Conveyance of a player’s intentions in performances of percussion. Interaction between auditory and visual information. In Y. Ando & D. Noson (Eds.), Music and concert hall acoustics (pp. 397–400). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ryan, C., Wapnick, J., Lacaille, N., & Darrow, A.-A. (2006). The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators’ performance ratings. Psychology of Music, 34, 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scherer, K. R., & Zentner, K. R. (2001). Emotional effects of music: Production rules. In J. A. Sloboda & P. N. Juslin (Eds.), Music and emotion (pp. 361–392). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sloboda, J. A., & Juslin, P. N. (2001). Psychological perspectives on music and emotion. In J. A. Sloboda & P. N. Juslin (Eds.), Music and emotion (pp. 71–104). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Staneski, R. A., & Kleinke, C. L. (1978). Nondependence between verbal and nonverbal measures of attraction. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, April.Google Scholar
  41. Thompson, W. F., Graham, P., & Russo, F. A. (2005). Seeing music performance: Visual influences on perception and experience. Semiotica, 1(4), 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson, W. F., & Russo, F. A. (2004). Visual influences on the perception of emotion in music. In S. Lipscomb, R. Ashley, R. Gjerdingen, & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for Music Perception and Cognition, Northwestern University, pp 198–199.Google Scholar
  43. Thompson, W. F., & Russo, F. A. (2006). Facial expressions of pitch structure. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, University of Bologna, pp 1141–1143.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, W. F., Russo, F. A., & Quinto, L. (2006). Preattentive integration of visual auditory dimensions of music. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Music and Gesture, Royal Northern College of Music, Manchester, pp 217–221.Google Scholar
  45. Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10, 121–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vines, B. W., Krumhansl, C. L., Wanderley, M. M., & Levitin, D. J. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perception of musical performance. Cognition, 101, 80–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wapnick, J., Darrow, A.-A., Kovacs, J., & Dalrymple, L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wapnick, J., Mazza, J., & Darrow, A.-A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior and dress on violin performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 510–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wapnick, J., Mazza, J., & Darrow, A.-A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior and dress on children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Antonietti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniela Cocomazzi
    • 1
  • Paola Iannello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCatholic University of the Sacred HeartMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations