Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 187–194 | Cite as

Blinking During and After Lying

  • Sharon LealEmail author
  • Aldert Vrij
Original Paper

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis derived from eye blink literature that when liars experience cognitive demand, their lies would be associated with a decrease in eye blinks, directly followed by an increase in eye blinks when the demand has ceased after the lie is told. A total of 13 liars and 13 truth tellers lied or told the truth in a target period; liars and truth tellers both told the truth in two baseline periods. Their eye blinks during the target and baseline periods and directly after the target period (target offset period) were recorded. The predicted pattern (compared to the baseline periods, a decrease in eye blinks during the target period and an increase in eye blinks during the target offset period) was found in liars and was strikingly different from the pattern obtained in truth tellers. They showed an increase in eye blinks during the target period compared to the baseline periods, whereas their pattern of eye blinks in the target offset period did not differ from baseline periods. The implications for lie detection are discussed.

Keywords

Eye blinks Deception 

References

  1. Bageley, J., & Manelis, L. (1979). Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 591–594.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, L. O., Goldstein, R., & Stern, J. A. (1987). Effects of information processing demands on physiological response patterns. Human Factors, 29, 213–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caso, L., Gnisci, A., Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2005). Processes underlying deception: An empirical analysis of truths and lies when manipulating the stakes. Journal of Interviewing and Offender Profiling, 2, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiba, H. (1985). Analysis of controlling facial expression when experiencing negative effect on an anatomical basis. Journal of Human Development, 21, 22–29.Google Scholar
  6. DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drew, G. C. (1951). Variations in reflex blink-rate during visual motor tasks. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstein, R., Bauer, L. O., & Stern, J. A. (1992). Effect of task difficulty and interstimulus interval on blink parameters. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 111–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). Facial Movements during anxiety states. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holland, M. K., & Tarlow, G. (1972). Blinking and mental load. Psychological Reports, 31, 119–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland, M. K., & Tarlow, G. (1975). Blinking and thinking. Psychological Reports, 41, 403–406.Google Scholar
  17. Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leal, S. (2005). Central and peripheral physiology of attention and cognitive demand: Understanding how brain and body work together. Ph.D. thesis, University of Portsmouth, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
  21. Malmstrom, F. V., Rachofsky, S. E., & Weber, R. J. (1977). Effects of illumination and meter on spontaneous blinking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 163–165.Google Scholar
  22. Mann, S., & Vrij, A. (2006). Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real life police interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCornack, S. A. (1997). The generation of deceptive messages: Laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 91–126). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Schweitzer, M. E., Brodt, S. E., & Croson, R. T. A. (2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spence, S. A., Farrow, T. F. D., Herford, A. E., Wilkinson, I. D., Zheng, Y., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849–2853.Google Scholar
  27. Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., et al. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359, 1755–1762.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stern, J. A., Walrath, L. C., & Goldstein, R. (1984). The endogenous eye blink. Psychophysiology, 21, 22–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Strömwall, L. A., Hartwig, M., & Granhag, P. A. (2006). To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, R., & Hick, R. F. (2007). Believed cues to deception: Judgements in self-generated trivial and serious situations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tecce, J. J. (1992). Psychology: Physiology and experimental. In McGraw-Hill yearbook of science and technology (pp. 375–377). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Vrij, A. (2002). Telling and detecting lies. In N. Brace & H. L. Westcott (Eds.), Applying psychology (pp. 179–241). Milton Keynes, Open University.Google Scholar
  34. Vrij, A. (2004). Invited article: Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Knight, S. (2006a). Police officers’, social workers’, teachers’ and the general public’s beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., & Morris, P. M. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vrij, A., Edward, K., & Bull, R. (2001). Stereotypical verbal and nonverbal responses while deceiving others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 899–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006b). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (in press). Increasing cognitive load in interviews to detect deceit. In B. Milne, S. Savage, & T. Williamson (Eds.), International developments in investigative interviewing. Uffculme: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2003). Deception detection. In P. W. Halligan, C. Bass, & D. A. Oakley (Eds.), Malingering and illness deception (pp. 348–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2006). Criteria-based content analysis: An empirical test of its underlying processes. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006c). Information-gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vrij, A., Semin, G. R., & Bull, R. (1996). Insight into behaviour during deception. Human Communication Research, 22, 544–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about live events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wallbott, H. G., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Stress specifics: Differential effects of coping style, gender, and type of stressor on automatic arousal, facial expression, and subjective feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 147–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. White, C. H., & Burgoon, J. K. (2001). Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations. Human Communication Research, 27, 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–57). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Portsmouth (UK)PortsmouthEngland

Personalised recommendations